It isn't the continuity
of a probability density function (pdf) but rather that physical (and economic) objects have state.
As I have just shown, the IPCC's procedure for extraction
of a probability density function over the equilibrium climate sensitivity is illogical.
The analysts choose three values of climate sensitivity (CS) that correspond to the 5th percentile (CS = 2.0 °C), median (CS = 2.5 °C), and 95th percentile (CS = 4.5 °C)
of the probability density function that were jointly estimated with the ocean heat uptake rate.
This time round we have had some minor concessions to observational estimates, but a significant proportion
of the probability density of the observational studies remains outwith the IPCC's likely range of 1.5 - 4.5 °C.
In economics, «risk» simply means the spread
of the probability density, without regard to whether the outcomes involved are positive or negative.
If you see the Tim Palmer quote somewhere here — only estimates in terms
of probability density functions are available from the Lorenzian Meteorological Office.
If your assessment
of the Probability Density Function (PDF) of the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) shows a probability that the ECS lies between 1.5 and 4.5 C less than 66 %, you are in disagreement with the IPCC, and your assessment lies outside of the consensus.
Moreover, climates themselves are in essence a form
of probability density function — for the weather patterns which exist within them.
Not exact matches
Typical
probabilities determined by the wave function were (x, t) 2, the
probability of density of particles in space.
Long before we reached such population
densities, however, we would in all
probability have been wiped out by «effluence» — that is, pollution and similar secondary problems
of overpopulation.
Maybe the writers want to weigh on how scientists explain exactly how pyramids were built, or the
probability density function
of aliens.
The team looked at an outer surface protein
of B. burgdorferi found in ticks — which can give clues about the vertebrate host — as well as the
probabilities that different host species transmit the microbe during a tick bite, the number
of larvae feeding on the animals, and population
densities.
The dimples in the
probability density surface reflect the more complicated interaction when two
of the atoms are close together.
The upper, bell - shaped surface represents the
probability density for each
of the three geometries, while the gray surface represents the strength
of the van der Waals force for that geometry.
By combining vehicle speed, snake - crossing speed, and models
of snake movement, they can determine the
probability of detecting a snake during a road survey and relate that to
density of snakes in the surrounding landscape.
«
Probability density function,» a statistical representation
of the likelihood
of something occurring at any point in time, was used to examine cloud properties, including vertical motion, liquid and ice water content, and the conditions
of cloud particle growth, including how ice crystals grow at the expense
of liquid droplets.
«If we assume that a person has an average follicular
density of 27 follicles per cm2 (for instance, on areas such as the arms and thighs), an active area
of 2 — 6 mm2 maximizes the
probability of hitting a single follicle in a randomly positioned, untargeted measurement,» say the researchers.
Then, they harnessed the statistical properties
of hundreds
of simulated clouds to derive relationships between vertical precipitation fluxes and
probability density functions for vertical air velocity and condensate loading.
We use spectroscopic data from a variety
of large surveys combined with infra - red photometry from 2MASS and AllWISE and compare these in a Bayesian manner with PARSEC isochrones to derive
probability density functions (PDFs) for stellar masses, ages and distances.
A number
of subsequent publications qualitatively describe parameter values that allow models to reproduce features
of observed changes, but without directly estimating a climate sensitivity
probability density function (PDF).
Approximately one third
of the stars present broad or multiple - peaked
probability density functions and hence increased uncertainties.
More specifically, we assume that an individual's
probability of choosing a given school type is affected by the school
density (that is, the number
of schools per square kilometer)
of each type in her municipality.
Topics included are: Area
of a regular shape Simplifying algebraic expressions Solving simple equations removal
of brackets Finding the percentage
of a quantity Expressing as a percentage Compound interest Fractions (add, multiply, divide)
Probability of a single event
Probability when a spinner is spun twice Dividing into a given ratio Conversion
of metric units Distance, Speed, Time
Density, Mass, Volume
The below target deviation formula is the square root
of the integral or sum
of w (x) * f (x) * (x-MAR) ^ 2, where f (x) is the
probability density function for a return
of x, the weighting function w (x) is 1 whenever x is below the MAR and zero whenever x is above the MAR..
Figure 2 provides the
probability density function, which shows the distribution
of possible retirement costs.
Using a binomial
density, the differences in the
probability of a condition by sex class and breed group was calculated.
Also, I note that by common usage the term «abrupt» (w.r.t. SLR) implies that «mainstream» experts would be surprised to observe such a response to AGW; nevertheless, the Earth's circulatory steams are inherently chaotic, and chaos theory clearly demonstrates that such systems can be subject to «strange attractors» that can increase the
probability of occurrence
of phenomenon towards the tail
of a «fat - tailed»
probability density function (PDF), such as that shown in Figure 3.
If you can estimate a
probability distribution for the values
of each independent input variable in a model (called a
probability density function or pdf), you can run many simulations where the value
of each independent variable in each cell for each run is selected from the
probability density function for that variable.
Interested readers can read the article for details about how the analysis was done, but basically Wigley and Raper presented
probability density functions, based on all
of the IPCC TAR scenarios.
what exactly is it that determines the
probability of an energy transition such as an electron emitting or absorbing a photon (besides
densities and occupancies
of states and incident photons, etc.)-- and how does refractive index affect this (it has to because the Planck function is proportional to n ^ 2 — has to be in order to satisfy 2nd law
of thermo...)-- and does it make sense to use an k, E diagram when electrons are not actually propagating as plane waves — I mean, what is the wavevector when the waveform is not a plane wave; is k a function
of space in atomic orbitals?
I don't know how absorption
probabilities go with pressure off the top
of my head, but for sure they decrease with decreasing pressure; focusing on band structure while excluding the huge drop in number
density with altitude is obfuscatory.
If there is a greater
density of CO2 molecules, then the
probability of a particular photon, at one
of these wavelengths that CO2 absorbs, coming across a CO2 molecule, is clearly increased.
[Response: Extremes are often considered as the «tails»
of the statistical distribution or the
probability density function (pdf).
Typical
probability density functions (pdfs)
of temperature (left) and precipitation on rainy days (right).
It is pointed out, however, that
probabilities of damage increase significantly well before such emergence time scales and it is shown that
probability density distributions
of aggregate damage become appreciably separated from those
of the control climate on time scales as short as 25 yr.
By mistake, in Figures S1a and S1b
of the GRL Auxiliary Material, Dr Forest included the graphs from the MIT Report version, showing very different
probability densities (PDFs) for climate sensitivity than those in Figure 2
of the main text
of Forest 2006 in GRL.
One recent paper (Libardoni and Forest, 2011) has addressed how alternative observational records
of surface temperature changes have an impact on the
probability density distributions.
This allows you to generate the
Probability Density Function (PDF)
of the AR5 attribution, as was done by Real Climate:
This is at least ten additional years compared to the majority
of previously published studies that have used the instrumental record in attempts to constrain the ECS.We show that the additional 10 years
of data, and especially 10 years
of additional ocean heat content data, have significantly narrowed the
probability density function
of the ECS.
In the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), an appendix to WGI Chapter 9, «Understanding and attributing climate change» [i], was devoted to these methods, which provided six
of the chapter's eight estimated
probability density functions (PDFs) for S inferred from observed changes in climate.
They make predictions and give
probability density functions
of «how likely» such and such temperature will be in year 2100.
The green line on the horizontal axis indicates the
probability density function (PDF)
of the observed natural fluctuations.
Chief we should think
of weather and climate predictions in terms
of equations whose basic prognostic variables are
probability densities ρ (X, t) where X denotes some climatic variable and t denoted time.
As the system wanders through the state space, there is a well defined quantity P (X, M) dV where X is a degree
of fredom, dV a small volume
of the phase state around a point M and P the
probability density.
If P is independent
of initial conditions and t then an invariant
probability density exists and the system while still being chaotic and unpredictable has a well defined
probability to be in a certain state.
I am criticizing Bayesian reasoning because it is used when it is not the case that «there is actual reliable information to substantiate the choice
of a prior
probability density.»
Distributions have certain properties
of convergence that
densities do not enjoy, whether the convergence is between
probability functions or a
probability function and data.
The issue gets confused here because IPCC had defined PDF to be the
probability density functions, shown in Figure 9.20, but it averaged
probability distribution functions
of Box 10.2, Figure 2.
Bayesian reasoning is strongly to be preferred when there is actual reliable information to substantiate the choice
of a prior
probability density.
That there isn't «reliable information to substantiate the choice
of a prior
probability density», I take it.