Sentences with phrase «of proof of anything»
Make sure you ask your OH representative what they need in terms of proof of anything that was lost and if they need to have a copy of these certificates beforehand.
http://www.rentersinsurance.net/ Not exact matches
Stone, in an email to CNBC, called the lawsuit a «left - wing conspiracy» that «strings together events they find suspicious based on partisan worldview but has NO proof of hacking never mind anything else.»
But they also failed to provide any compelling proof they had a hacked movie — whether it's «Star Wars,» «Pirates of the Caribbean,» or anything else.
I think that one of the proofs of success, nowadays, from a cultural standpoint, is when you go to Amazon and you don't do anything, there are people already selling t - shirts.
So if you're worried about making similar mistakes, you can run things like your resume, anything you want to publicly post, and the content of important emails through Correctica's «Proof It Free» tool.
It's just further proof that many investors don't mind losing a steady trickle of money paying for hedges, so long as they're protected to the downside, should anything shock the market.
Because neither of these allegations resulted in criminal charges, much less convictions, they're not proof of anything.
I am not sure that what happened last week is proof of anything I've been saying, but I do think that the framework I have used over the past decade has been useful, at least to me, in understanding both the rebalancing process in China and the events that led up to the global crisis of 2007 - 08.
Such tokens are used for sales and marketing, bounty program, rewarding content creators before Proof of Creativity mining officially starts, and anything that facilitates the development of the ecosystem.
They also argue that proof - of - work mining is the best way to secure the network, and that anything less would lose censorship resistance, an essential attribute of bitcoin.
Belief, no matter how strong, is not proof of anything.
No proof of anything after death at all.
justsayin, you have failed repeatedly to produce any single shred of proof that your drivel is worth the bandwidth it consumes or that prayer achieves anything.
The whole point is you don't accept anything without proof, if tomorrow someone comes up with a better model of universal gravitation then we move to that model.
Name a single Atheist charity, orphanage, Hospital anything Run by Atheists for the benefit of there fellow man... You love yourselves to much to consider helping those in need, The proof is in the pudding
As for the one god being more valid than any of the other thousands, that things you attribute to him (technically to Jesus), still haven't been proven in anything outside of the bible, which no one of a scientific mind can accept as convincing proof.
You have no proof that the bible is anything but a book of bronze age fables.
You have yet to prove anything I stated as incorrect and even added proof by admiting to fitting into the definitions of a religion
The story of a resuurection is not proof of anything, as the story you've been told since birth was NOT recorded by anyone who was there, rather it was FINALLY written down 2 generations after the so - called «fact».
But lack of proof that nobody comes back from anything does not necessarily validate your «reality».
I'd switch if I were you... or, you could just believe the reality... that nobody comes back from anything, since of course, there is no proof at all.
Atheism is proof positive that you can convince anybody of anything, even the non-existence of your own creator!!
I believe god is love, I think we have little ability to understand much beyond that at this point and those who would define and codify god are arrogant fools doing harm in this world, I believe that the absence of love in anything is proof that it doesn't come from god, fire and brimstone does not come from god, unconditional love and acceptance does.
Anybody can look up John 3:16 (you do not have to be a member of anything) I'd rather get a discount for John 3:16 than for a coupon clipped from Pennysaver or proof of purchase at Denny's.
'' you could just believe the reality... that nobody comes back from anything, since of course, there is no proof at all.»
Personally, I feel that if there is a god, and he wants me to believe he exists, he can come over here and tell me himself, I don't accept the Bible as «proof» of anything, because it is self - contradictory and appears to be heavily influenced by the governing culture of the time.
Why is there zero proof of anything supernatural ever occurring on earth?
The BVG Theorem doesn't even attempt that, so why would we think you would have proof of anything more?
What there is no proof anywhere, or evidence of, is anything ever being done by any «god».
Books written by believers are not proof of anything.
So right off the bat, these are weak statements, much less proofs of anything.
Why do you continue to act like the bible is proof of anything?
Kind of sad that you think how long it's lasted is proof of anything.
A facet of faith is trust, so if you're looking for infallible proof I can't give that to you, nor can anyone or anything.
The burden of proof for anything lies on the one making the claim.
The bible isn't proof of anything more than the fact that man is a good story teller.
You have a strong bias toward wanting anything you observe as a part of your testing to be proof of what you believe.
How do you know god commands anything when there is no proof that this god said anything but plenty of proof that man did?
Religious text are not proof of anything.
As if it was proof of anything other than an individuals belief.
The events of a fairy tale are not proof of anything, and the fact that people are willing to die for their silly beliefs only demonstrates how easily some people are fooled in to believing nonsense.
«matt — just because we can use science and reason to explain natural events doesn't mean there isn't a god, case in point, rainbows, a sign given by god to Noah can be explained by science but is still a promise made by god» But thats not proof of anything.
It's a huge waste of time, they call the bible truth, the never have any proof of anything (how can they) it's the same rebuttal, you have to have faith, or Free Will and they only get more silly from there.
The combined efforts of all the worlds religions have spent a lot of time looking for proof of their gods, none of them hav efound anything yet, that's rather telling.
============ @Bryant Lister» The events of a fairy tale are not proof of anything, and the fact that people are willing to die for their silly beliefs only demonstrates how easily some people are fooled in to believing nonsense.
It may not be scientific proof of anything, but it is proof of something of meaning, of psychologicaly use, to that individual.
Therefore Tacitus is NO proof of anything.
Quoting the bible is not proof of anything.
This article is proof that a person can make the Bible say anything he or she wants it to say by taking verses out of context and using the old «mistranslation» excuse.
One day we find a fragment of unknown quality, origin, and intent that was written in Egypt 20 generations after Jesus» life and this is somehow historic proof of anything?