In a terse, five - page ruling on Wednesday, the Second Judicial Department Appeals Court agreed with the defense lawyers, saying the Brooklyn district attorney's office had indeed failed to turn over crucial evidence and had never corrected «the knowingly false or mistaken material
testimony of a prosecution witness.»
Defence counsel on Tuesday declined cross examination
of a prosecution witness in the ongoing trial of Femi Fani - Kayode facing charges of money laundering before a Federal High Court, Lagos.
The defense in the trial of Joe Percoco has worked to hurt the
credibility of prosecution witness Todd Howe by offering examples of how the disgraced lobbyist would alter emails to pump up his own reputation.
Counsel is entitled to ask
questions of prosecution witnesses in as much detail as he wishes based on his instructions, but without indicating what the defendant's evidence might have been and in the knowledge that he will not be able to call evidence to contradict the answers given.
On the first day of presenting their defense cases Thursday, their lawyers urged a federal judge to dismiss the charges on a number of grounds, not the least of which, they said, is that the government has failed to prove corruption occurred after nearly five
weeks of prosecution witnesses and evidence.
Counsel to the third defendant (Agi), Jeph Ejinkonye, urged the court to take another look at the
account of prosecution witnesses to see if there was any need for his client to enter defense.
The court took the defense to task over diversionary tactics, such as demanding a
list of a prosecution witness's published articles for the last decade and the witness's compensation, as the «legal equivalent of Obi - Wan Kenobi's «These aren't the droids you're looking for.
The ruling requires prosecutors to actively seek and turn over to defense attorneys any information — known as Giglio material, after a Supreme Court case by that name — that might be used to attack the
credibility of prosecution witnesses.
As the Dasukigate unfold, the ongoing trial of former Chairman of DAAR Communications Plc, Raymond Dokpesi before the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja suffered another setback on Tuesday following the
absence of prosecution witness.
Trial judges have nothing to lose and often much to gain by permitting at least brief voir dire / cross
examination of prosecution witnesses before a damning exhibit is offered into evidence.
However, lawyer for the plaintiff Peter Dadze rejected the testimony
of the prosecution witness.
Nyame, who is standing trial for a 41 - count charge of criminal misappropriation of N1.64 bn state funds, had on January 18, 2017 through his counsel, Charles Edosomwan, SAN, urged the court to «hold that the testimony
of prosecution witnesses have been so damaged and can't be relied on», and «the crucial elements are missing in this case».
On the count of acceptance of gratification, the counsel argued that the evidence
of Prosecution Witness 16 — Babatunde Adepoju, an operative of State Security Service (SSS), had adequately proved otherwise.
Money Laundering: Ex-Gov Ohakim's Son Allegedly Threatens Prosecution Witness An unimaginable drama, on Tuesday, January 26, 2016, stalled the cross-examination
of prosecution witness, Abu Sule in the case involving a former governor of Imo State, Ikedi Ohakim, as prosecution counsel, Festus Keyamo, revealed how the accused's son, Emeka Ohakim, had allegedly went on the trail -LSB-...]
An unimaginable drama, on Tuesday, January 26, 2016, stalled the cross-examination
of prosecution witness, Abu Sule in the case involving a former governor of Imo State, Ikedi Ohakim, as prosecution counsel, Festus Keyamo, revealed how the accused's son, Emeka Ohakim, had allegedly went on the trail of the prosecution witness.
In his cross-examination
of prosecution witnesses, Mr. O'Donnell has sought to cast Mr. Wills as a rookie politician tripped up by arcane campaign finance laws and shoddy record - keeping.
An inferior court appeal by 27 year old Al Jones, succeeded today when Justice Adolph Lucas ruled that they were discrepancies in the testimonies
of prosecution witnesses and he quashed the conviction, set aside the sentence and acquitted Jones.
He was able to take my case to a Jury Trial and get me a Not Guilty verdict through he expert knowledge of the law and expertise in cross examination
of the prosecutions witnesses.