Sentences with phrase «of proven false»

This sort of proves false the maxim that its the best time to buy when things look the worst.

It was true they had both lived through the Ross administration, but Edna's confirmation of this proved a false shibboleth.

``... every occasion of a proved false allegation has an insidious effect in public confidence in the truth of genuine complaints, sometimes allowing doubt to creep in where none should in truth exist.»

Not exact matches

Theranos presented the facts to this reporter to prove the accuracy and reliability of its tests and to directly refute these false allegations, including through over 1,000 pages of statements and documents,» according to the statement.

They suggest most women in their 40s should not have routine mammograms because the tests may cause more harm than good because of false positive results (follow - up testing proves negative for cancer).

Thompson himself was ousted in May, after some of his academic credentials proved to be false.

He mentioned some of the claims, including one that five busloads of black voters from Mississippi came into the state to vote, which he said was proven false after an investigation.

Theranos presented the facts to this reporter to prove the accuracy and reliability of its tests and to directly refute these false allegations, including more than 1,000 pages of statements and documents.

A new genetic test that analyzes the free DNA floating in a pregnant woman's blood was proven to be more effective at predicting chromosomal disorders compared with standard screening tests, due to its much smaller incidence of false - positive results.

There's no reward for taking on something that has significance bordering on religious for some... even if it proves to be a bit of a «false god.»

apart from the Shroud of Turin being proven false, I do love the delicious irony that had it been authenticated and the real blood of jesus was found there, we would be able to clone except, OOPS!

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

Behe presented the evidence for his hypothesis, Ken Miller proved how each piece of evidence he put forward was false, and the theory of evolution once again proved to be the top candidate to explain the phenomena of biological changes over time.

Have you ever 2Timothy3: 1 - 5 It speak about in the last day critical time hard to deal with will be here.2 men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money,self - assuming, haughty, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, disloyal, 3 having no natural affection, not open to any agreement, slanderers, without self control, fierce, without love of goodness, 4 betrayers, headstrong, puffed up with pride, lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of god, 5 having a form of godly devotion but proving false to its power, and from these turn away.God speak of these thing occurring in our day.

This is the fallacy of assuming something is true simply because it hasn't been proven false.

If you believe your belief is falsifiable, tell me what kind of scientific study I can do to prove your god false.

I can not, likewise, prove that it isn't secretly responsible for gravity and that all of general relativity is false.

It is not truth, it was written by men, and is fiction (I can say it is fiction since so much of it has been proven false.).

With the esteemed position that the earth was at the center of the universe proven false, the church lost both prestige and credibility to emerging science.

- The bible is full of contradictions and proves itself false.

Is the responsibility of Christians to prove evolution is false, or scientists to prove it is fact?

in the day, s that jesus our lord was on the earth (jesus) there was many people named jesus, just as among hispanic and central american peoples, it was a common popular name of many people, if you want to prove to your self that jesus was not married, look up what the apostle said,» i saw standing upon mount zion with the lamb 144,000, these are they that have washed thier robes and were not defilled with women, for they are virgins, jesus emphasised in parts the need and values of a husband and wife in a home, the two mary, s and the women that followed him and ministered unto him tells us the great importance of women, and women in the home, he wanted all married men to have thier own wife, in those days of so many years ago there was false prophets, storytellers, wild imaginations, he told us not to believe them, whether you are catholic, christian, islamic or any other, we can all take pride in the fact what the prohets, jesus and the apostles told us all fits jointly to gether, they were a work of love, to understand the christian bible correctly, islamic people are not rejected, but rather they are a equal, the angel told hagar to return to her mistress, he also told her he would make ishmael a blessing and his seed a great nation, regards

You have correct definitions, except you left out the definition of a SCIENTIFIC theory, which is different than a regular theory in that these theories are true but still might be able to be proven false.

Noahs Ark has been proven false; virgin birth has been proven false; the creation story; the age of the earth... oh so many things and for you to deny the ACTUAL evidence is simply you being a narrow - minded, intellectually dishonest person.

Now, if two of the holy trinity are proven to be false, why should the third be true?

The respected Christian apologist and author, C.S. Lewis 1960 essay «The Worlds Last Night» «Say what you like,» we shall be told, «the apocalyptic beliefs of the first Christians have been proved to be false.

There will always be someone trying to prove the Bible is not true, but for those of us who have seen the work of God, who truly believe in him, it doesn't really matter what science says, or what they can «prove» to be false about God or the Bible, what God has done in my life and keeps on doing is proof enough to know He exists.

I spent most of my upbringing agnostic believing God couldn't be proven real or false and gave little thought to religion.

«I know the bible is fictional as I have been able to prove that much of the bible is false, so the rest is suspect.»

Even within the churches, there truly a lack of love, for the Bible also says that many would be «having a form of godly devotion but proving false to its power.»

However, if a premise is faulty, it is the responsibility of the opponent to prove it false.

Science takes credit for trying to interpret what God has created (yet of course there theories are always wrong or never proven, even after proven, often changed when found out to be false (because scientists are wrong all the time and think they are right)

----------------- — Actuall, no, you haven't been able to «prove that much of the Bible is false.»

-LSB-... this] ought not be surprising — except to those who carry a burden of false assumptions about love, celibacy, and their relationship... As a mature man, he took the decision to express his [proven] capacity for love as a celibate in the priesthood... He was choosing to express his love and his paternal instinct spiritually, through the gift of his life in service to others.

How can any church muzzle people in the 21st century when science and technology prove so many of their tenets to be false?

Science and Religion News Science and Scientism At the heart of the natural sciences is falsifiability, the ability to prove a theory false by experiment or observation.

You claimed science proves the Bible wrong as to Joshua's account of the moon and sun stopping which is false and can not be supported by science (including Newton's law which you interjected)

Science has proven pretty much all of it to be false and the book itself contradicts itself more so than the hypocrites who read it.

Needless to say, all of my attempts to prove that the editors» definition was false and unduly constrained went for naught.

valerie0423 Have you ever taken the time to read any of the mythologies or other sacred texts of rival religions to prove them false?

It is only possible to prove an existential positive (i.e. something does exist) or to show that an universal qualification is false (by way of counter example)

And since historical date proves Jesus of Nazareth lived, your asessment of myth is totally false.

i will tell you that the one thing that god gave us is the power of will or choice and that is why we can decide to do good or bad or follow him or not but the evidence of a true christian is that person life will change and not is a small way.my people open your eyes and do not be fools to believe that there is no god because you know in your own heart while you say it, deep inside you can see that a god do exist and i do not need to tell you that or prove it to you because you know it is true.unfortunately there are false preachers who do not teach the truth or a halph truth which has led millions down the wrong path and today we see the result of it everywhere.

Science makes absolutely no attempts to undermine, discredit, or prove false, much less attack any of the thousands of religions and Gods man has created.

Elimination of the French, of course; but also an economic recession, the establishment of a dictatorial state, a false and altogether regressive socialism, and the condemnation of all who had participated in the violent struggle, because they proved completely unfitted for conducting a rational government.

Once you get through the deception and their crazy no - fact doctrine based on book where it's history has been proven false due to the lack of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leavof DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leavOF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leave.

How sad that you deny real evidence for a 2000 year old book that has never been updated and can be proven to be false on numerous things... a book written by primitive man to fool the gullible out of money and make them live in fear.

Some of my preconceived notions about religion and religious people have been proven false.

But we would much rather much around inside ourselves and other false gods which proves our love of darkness.

In a post — Cold War, post-9 / 11 world strewn with conflicts involving competing religious postures and contradictory global views, where supposed divisions on lines of race, culture, and faith are loudly promoted and violently exploited, the example of past wars fought in pursuit of religious idealism has proved seductive for some seeking false assurance from continuity with history.