Of course all the signs
of pseudo science are there; claimed effect is nearly undetectable, it can't be replicated (too «difficult»), there is a «consensus», we have a computer model, there is no list of alternative hypotheses to compare / contrast, no way to make it falsifiable...
That's not the only discrepancy in the world
of pseudo science that purports to be in the interest of human health.
She is infamous for spouting a lot
of pseudo science that sounds good, but is not actual science.
We do not want all the bloodshed, teaching
of pseudo science to children, the corruption of children's minds, government subsidies to those who claim to know the unknowable, elected leaders who consult with the supernatural in their decision - making, and the list just goes on and on.
sally sally sally, pseudo science is what you live by... no great flood, no virgin birth... the bible is full
of pseudo science but if you had an education past grade 1 you'd comprehend that.
Not exact matches
It is true enough that the
pseudo science of young earthers and biblical literalists would seem to support this view.
But the second reason von Däniken advances to explain orthodox
science's prejudiced condemnation
of his postulate sounds a bit more «
pseudo.»
Melissa is a full time nutrition researcher and health writer who honed her fact finding and research analysis skills from an extensive background as an award winning and professionally trained journalist.With a lot
of misinformation, hype, and
pseudo science floating around the health, nutrition, and weigh loss industry, Melissa's ability to uncover fact filled and research backed information makes her an invaluable addition to our team at Bembu.
In my opinion what has happened in this area is that a kind
of social ideology is now embedded within the medical paradigm, to the extent that that social judgments are masquerading as scientific judgments making the
science a
pseudo science, as a relatively small number
of people have been placed in a position wherein they can choose what relevant lines
of evidence (and what counter arguments) are acceptable and which are not, as deemed by themselves.
«Rather, it is in what they help reveal about the tight network
of behavioral scientists so eager for CIA and Pentagon contracts that they showed few qualms about getting involved with institutions that were using
pseudo behavioral
science to brutalize prisoners.
Our skin hosts trillions
of bacteria good ones and they thrive in the slightly acidic environment on the skin (yes this means that baking soda baths are
pseudo science / logic never ingest or bath in Baking soda it will screw up your PH even your intestines are acidic that is why vinegar works so well to balance the flora
of our gut) Worse comes worse you skin will start to tear and your skin can become prone to flesh eating bacteria (yes in theory dabbing Apple cider vinegar would be the best cure than antibiotics) I have been searching high and low for anyone who has found a way to get Mg through an alternative preparation like mixing it with apple cider vinegar.
Nothing but a bunch
of make - believe
pseudo science.
Or we need to educate young people in this area, proving its role in environmental protection, its utility to save Earth resources and supplement them with other cosmic ones, in the intellectual development
of the child, in fighting against the superstition and
pseudo -
sciences, in the knowledge
of ethnic traditions in relation to a globalized world.
There's
pseudo science, such as the radioactive effects
of kryptonite on Superman.
In modern times, this parasite is causing people to hoard cats, feed cats, defend TNR, or like Mr. Wolf to spend inordinate amounts
of times on the internet, spewing
pseudo science in the hopes that this will result in more cats outdoors.
By fusing his
pseudo science with the wild - eyed efforts
of eco-activists, media dupes and pandering politicians, he's been able to convince the public that his flawed theory is actually holy writ.
If you're jealous
of what the scientists understand, or don't like the fact that someone out there might actually know more than you and is influencing policy as a result
of their knowledge, then learn about the
science, don't demonstrate your stupidity with obviously non-referenced and non-researched ridiculous
pseudo theories.
Looks like another bunch
of pseudo scientists is getting into the business
of writing
science - fiction now.
They took a page from the playbook
of the tobacco companies... the same thing is going on now with some, not all, some
of the large carbon polluters, putting out false information, hiring
pseudo scientists to pretend that they have the lowdown on the
science...
Instead, seeing for myself just how shallow their thinking is, and how transparent their politicking is, I am more terrified that it is so easy for such a collection
of mediocre minds to achieve such prominence, merely by flattering politicians with such rank
pseudo science.
That makes the supposed observation
of the natural greenhouse effect ie, «we are 33C warmer than we would otherwise be», the
pseudo science assertion
of a failed hypothesis.
In both instances, I said that in my view the show's format was flawed in that it would put non-peer-reviewed,
pseudo science conducted by largely unqualified non-experts alongside decades
of genuine peer reviewed scientific research.
Without its life blood
of climate change protection money the academic priests will soon find their temples short
of funding and their decit based carreers destroyed as their
pseudo science for ego and personal gain is exposed for what it is.
It's not about the egos and deceit
of academics and the tiny few Bilions more wasted by the hugely wasteful insider boondoggle that is the UN gravy train on proving their scapegoat gas guilty for profit by one cause «
science», using co-operative leftist
pseudo scientists.
So I took a practical jobbing phsyicist / engineers look at the macro «
science»
of climate change over extended periods, not atmospheric weather, which, in fact, rapidly revealed itself as Feynman's
pseudo science, «they follow the methods, but haven't prove any laws».
The
Pseudo science mainly comes from Hansen's estimate
of sensitivity using paleo reconstruction.
nor their capacity to blind themselves to facts.; ideolog -LCB-- y, - ically, etc -RCB-; intellectually impoverished adherents
of post modernism «
science»,; IPCC; lying cheating warmist «scientist»; Lysenko; morally and ethically bankrupt; more skullduggery by the «Team»; orthodoxy; Phrenology ~ climate
science; policy apparachiks; post modern; Propaganda;
pseudo science; religion; religious -LCB-- ly - based -RCB-; sacred CAGW gospel; scam; «
science» now means «propaganda» «idolatry», «blindness», «mendacity» and «venality»; scum; vindictive people; pitchforks and torches and tar....
We are now seeing the freaky arguments at the core
of anti AGW
pseudo science, beginning with heat from Earth's innards and ending with fantastic ocean forces.
Even in the face
of imminent death, some people prefer the anecdotal evidence
of testimonies and
pseudo practitioners instead
of established
science.
As a further indication that PAS is nothing but
pseudo science we need only look at some
of Gardner's other «scientific findings.»