Stephen L. Carter warns that we must not fall into the error of speaking «as though the Constitution and the decisions explicating it constitute the
whole of public morality.»
They had tacitly accepted a truce on theological discussion in order to concentrate on a task in which they were all at one — action in the
spheres of public morality and social evils.
Until quite recently, Americans have debated the
issues of public morality in theological terms which they thought had something to do with truth claims.
As Richard knew far better than the many Jews he criticized for departing from the teachings of the Jewish tradition on
questions of public morality, Jews have no plausible identity when they are unfaithful to their revelation - based tradition, just as their revelation - based tradition has no worldly reality without real Jews faithfully practicing it.
Yet even as the politics of the progressive paradigm comes under skeptical reconsideration, the
model of public morality that goes with it remains largely unexamined.
It points to a much larger issue in the whole
area of public morality: Can a corporate entity — a nation, a tribe, a people — repent?
In recent years horror directors John Carpenter and Wes Craven have confronted their genre's alleged role in debasing the masses — engaging the conservative's paranoia that Hollywood is a prime
polluter of public morality — and in doing so they've both taken interesting risks with their formulas and fans.
Consequently, secular humanists reject religious doctrine and divine revelation as the
basis of public morality and decision - making.
Several of the teachers of values education believe that only a Christian perspective can renew the
foundations of public morality — even in a Hindu context — just as it was the encounter with Christianity that prompted Gandhi (and many of his generation) to revise the dominant understanding of Hinduism.