Sentences with phrase «of public school bureaucracy»
Fifty years ago, Michigan began an experiment by legislatively creating a new layer of public school bureaucracy: intermediate school districts.
http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/ Not exact matches
The pair's solutions to the alleged problems of CEO - speak are greater government control of markets, more bureaucracy in the private and public sectors, an end to CEOs» duty of care to shareholders and — get this — more snore - inducing courses on critical textual analysis in business schools so students can know exactly how many times a CEO says «our company» versus «the company.»
Run by radicals for approximately twenty years, Berkeley has experienced the virtual ruin of its public school system, a vastly increased municipal bureaucracy, a greatly diminished housing stock (thanks to stringent rent controls and other restrictions on property rights), increased crime and drug abuse, widespread corruption, and wholesale waste of public funds.
A Tribune analysis in January highlighted concerns about fraud in the federal school lunch program within Chicago Public Schools because of layers of bureaucracy, incentives for high enrollment, and minimal checks and balances.
As you'll recall, Cuomo said during his State of the State address that he would be the self - appointed «lobbyist» for public school students this year, taking on what he perceives to be the bloated bureaucracy in the education system.
Many people believe education is best run at the local level because school boards and school officials better serve the public when they are able to be held accountable by the local community they serve; when the decision - makers have local roots, many believe they do a better job than a monolithic federal bureaucracy hundreds or thousands of miles away.
So local government officials are teaming up with leaders from business, labor, schools, and neighborhood groups to figure out how to shrink the layers of public bureaucracy in Onondaga County.
The governor, who has attacked components of the public school system as an «education bureaucracy» that must be broken, instead stuck to the positive in this year's State of the State address.
Whereas the public school bureaucracy is capable of incremental change at most, education entrepreneurs see beyond long - established barriers and disrupt the status quo.
America's deeply conservative public education system is striking back at this disruptive innovation, which shifts power from producers to consumers; demonstrates that more can be done with less at the school level; and moves control of resources from central bureaucracies to autonomous schools.
Strong chapters on school desegregation, bilingual education, education for the disabled, and school finance all support Davies's argument that «in the 1970s, reform often emanated from... within the federal bureaucracy, from the lower federal courts, and through the energetic efforts of congressional staffers, lobbyists, and public interest law firms.»
By contrast, the political forces that surround public schools - particularly schools in troubled urban systems - tend to promote excessive bureaucracy and to impede the development of the qualities that schools need to succeed.
Various fundamental reform proposals put forward since the publication in 1989 of Politics, Markets, and America's Schools by John Chubb and Terry Moe would replace regulatory compliance with student - performance standards, make schools» existence and staff members» jobs contingent on performance, give families choices among public schools, and transfer control of public funds from centralized bureaucracies to individual sSchools by John Chubb and Terry Moe would replace regulatory compliance with student - performance standards, make schools» existence and staff members» jobs contingent on performance, give families choices among public schools, and transfer control of public funds from centralized bureaucracies to individual sschools» existence and staff members» jobs contingent on performance, give families choices among public schools, and transfer control of public funds from centralized bureaucracies to individual sschools, and transfer control of public funds from centralized bureaucracies to individual schoolsschools.
In brief, the public school system over time became a huge set of ever - larger, poorly managed bureaucracies.
To the best of our knowledge, and based on all evidence that we're aware of, neither the signers of the Shanker Institute manifesto, nor leaders in the Obama / Duncan Education Department, advocate a «nationalized curriculum» that would «undermine control of public school curriculum and instruction at the local and state level» and «transfer control to an elephantine, inside - the - Beltway bureaucracy.»
By the early 1960s, others on the opposite end of the political spectrum also were making the argument that vouchers were a viable alternative for getting around the bureaucracy and ineffectiveness of many public schools.
In a 1966 essay for the Public Interest on «slum schools,» Jencks sounded as if he might have been channeling Goodman as he castigated the absurd logic of school bureaucracy.
All too often, the public perception of school administration is that it is a large bureaucracy diverting critical resources from instruction.
He has particular ire for his fellow principals and school superintendents, who he blames for paving the «path to public education's meltdown,» and for the NEA and AFT, whose efforts in making teaching a lucrative public - sector profession insulated from even desultory performance management, for helping to perpetuate bureaucracies that «feed the egos of adults while squashing the hopes of children».
Layers and layers of bureaucracy, top - down standards, onerous reporting requirements, and tests have been foisted on public schools for decades.
Public charter schools are able to operate with increased flexibility as a result of operating outside of district bureaucracies.
After all, the reasons for promoting choice often rest on the fact that public school systems are strangled by politics, bureaucracy, byzantine contractual rules, and licensing procedures that aggravate a shortage of quality employees.
that New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg seized control of the city's sprawling public school bureaucracy and its 1.1 million students on July 1, 2002.
• Risk underestimated the resistance to change from the organized interests of the K - 12 public education system, at the center of which were the two big teacher unions as well as school administrators, colleges of education, state bureaucracies, school boards, and many others.
The only material difference between charter and traditional public schools is that the latter are not part of the local school - governance bureaucracy, whether a school board, a mayor or even a state - appointed superintendent.
The image of the Chicago Public Schools as a wasteful bureaucracy was aggravated by its continuing financial problems.
Most school districts are either too small or too large — too small to afford the kind of administrative supports they need, or too large for a public bureaucracy to remain easily governable and accountable.
Public school systems that are too small to enjoy any economies of scale or too large to avoid the inefficiencies of public bureaucracy can not maximize the education dollars devoted to teacher salPublic school systems that are too small to enjoy any economies of scale or too large to avoid the inefficiencies of public bureaucracy can not maximize the education dollars devoted to teacher salpublic bureaucracy can not maximize the education dollars devoted to teacher salaries.
The history books will show that New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg seized control of the city's sprawling public school bureaucracy and its 1.1 million students on July 1, 2002.
Later, Jewell groused that achievement school districts represent little more than a «new layer of bureaucracy that lacks the accountability to ensure public dollars are being spent effectively.»
But charters are themselves public schools, albeit without the burden of work rules and other constraints imposed by unions and the bureaucracy.
When the idea of charter schools came along — public schools that would 1) run themselves independently of the bureaucracies that were / are a huge part of the problem, 2) would get to hire their own staff members ensuring «fit» with the school, AND 3) would be held accountable for results in educating students — many amazing people stood up and said they would create and run great public schools where they were needed the most.
The public school system has mostly failed to provide those urban minority communities with the same quality of educational opportunities as their white peers, and in the early 90s policy leaders of both parties said enough was enough and began to support the charter school concept: public schools that would be independent from school district bureaucracies, free to innovate and more accountable for results.
It is true that charter schools are exempt from some of the regulations and bureaucracy that hamper conventional public schools, but charter schools are subject to civil - rights and safety regulations and most of the academic requirements mandated by the state.
As the head of family engagement in Washington state's Federal Way Public Schools, Trise Moore helps parents navigate a large bureaucracy and puts them at the center of the district's decisionmaking.
In the state bureaucracy, every public school has a unique, 14 - digit California Department of Education - assigned County - District - School (CDS) code, which is used to report Average Daily Attendance, disburse funding, and report on student outschool has a unique, 14 - digit California Department of Education - assigned County - District - School (CDS) code, which is used to report Average Daily Attendance, disburse funding, and report on student outSchool (CDS) code, which is used to report Average Daily Attendance, disburse funding, and report on student outcomes.
In his Friday letter, «Money and power drive opponents of vouchers,» Rep. Steve Nass, R - Whitewater, claimed those wanting performance report cards for private schools receiving public funds under Wisconsin's voucher program are under the spell of the powerful «education bureaucracy.»
Many educators and policy makers are concerned about the potential bureaucracy needed to administer such a program and a possible loss of public school funding.
The fact is, after decades of monopoly control of public schools, teachers unions and their enabling bureaucracies are facing an existential crisis.
The $ 23 billion budget deal speeding through the N.C. General Assembly this week includes a platoon of significant public school initiatives, including much - touted teacher raises, a swift ballooning of the state's funding for a private school voucher program and dramatic cut - backs for North Carolina's central K - 12 bureaucracy.
Those who support private management of public schools contend that schools are inefficient bureaucracies that produce mediocre results.
The schools assure the public that if they are freed from much of the restrictions that mire many public schools in bureaucracy, they will use taxpayers» money to provide students with a high - quality education.
With the public - school bureaucracy out of the way, powerhouses in the reform movement, such as the Walton and Gates foundations, came calling.
The more levels of bureaucracy Michigan's public school system requires, the less likely resources will be directed toward what matters most — student achievement.
Charter proponents cite it as an example of how freedom of traditional public school bureaucracy can produce impressive results.
Asked about the role of independent public charter schools in K - 12 education in Georgia, Governor Deal said, «Innovation, flexibility and accountability are fundamental building blocks to driving student achievement in K - 12 education, and charter schools are catalysts for improvement and reform within a system that has long been burdened by bureaucracy and inflexibility due to top - down control.»
Henderson first began crusading to dismantle the fortressed bureaucracy of some public schools in the 1970s, at a time when groups like Common Cause and Ralph Nader's Public Citizen were pushing for government to be more responsive to citpublic schools in the 1970s, at a time when groups like Common Cause and Ralph Nader's Public Citizen were pushing for government to be more responsive to citPublic Citizen were pushing for government to be more responsive to citizens.
I think that so much of the discussion around tenure in K12 is linked to a widespread idea that the state has a monopoly over public schools and has yielded a bureaucracy that has failed schools, etc..
Charter public schools put the needs of students first, not the interests of the bureaucracy.
The list of problems with public schools in L.A. — from effectively teaching English language learners to dealing with an anti-reform-minded teachers» union to bad principals and teachers to a huge, messy bureaucracy to better parent involvement and so forth — is long and varied.