Sentences with phrase «of pure comparative negligence»

The state follows the rule of pure comparative negligence, which simply means that the amount of compensation you can get will be reduced by your own degree of fault.

Under the law of pure comparative negligence, an injury victim can recover compensation for injuries suffered in an accident even if he or she was more than 51 percent at fault.

Under the theory of pure comparative negligence, each party can be held liable for the portion of the accident that is their fault.

Mississippi uses a system of pure comparative negligence, which means that a victim may be able to recover damages after an accident in which they were partly at fault, no matter their proportion of responsibility.

Yes, Washington state law operates on a policy of pure comparative negligence.

In New Mexico, courts follow the doctrine of pure comparative negligence.

In California, the rules of pure comparative negligence are followed.

The state of California relies on a system of pure comparative negligence to determine liability in a car accident.

Washington is in the minority of states that have adopted the law of pure comparative negligence.

New Mexico follows the rule of pure comparative negligence.