I get it, it's a marketing ploy
of pure democracy and the other four teams have fans with computers, too, but here's the fallout.
But, given the unsustainability
of pure democracy, it's not surprising that by the Eighties we had the bourgeois bohemian mixture of oligarchy and democracy, with bourgeois trumping bohemian at every turn.
Not exact matches
One
of the primary reasons that our government was set up as a Democratic Republic (as opposed to a
pure democracy) was to «protect the minority from the tyranny
of the majority».
The Founding Fathers knew that every
pure democracy never lasted because they eventually turned into mob rule, where the majority got all
of the rights and everyone else had none.
Irreligious and idolatrous cultures may take many forms, from the
pure self - seeking
of irresponsible individualism, through the various types
of more or less organized pursuit
of advantage, to the collectivistic autonomy
of a totalitarian «people's
democracy.»
Somehow, capitalism is now confused with
democracy and so wierd complete laisez faire capitalism is held up as a goal, when that kind
of pure capitalism leads to pollution, child labor sweatshops, etc..
For reasons Maritain articulates at some length, a certain kind
of democracy, guarded against the diseases to which «
pure»
democracies are prey, best represents the full flowering
of human practical wisdom about the sorts
of institutions worthy
of Jewish and Christian thought.
Democracy is not an abstract concept
of the kind that can be set forth mathematically in terms
of pure ratiocination.
This spectrum stretches from
pure democracy, with majority rule, to representative
democracies where a subset
of the populace speaks for the whole.
From this view
of the subject it may be concluded that a
pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting
of a small number
of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit
of no cure for the mischiefs
of faction.
Let us examine the points in which it varies from
pure democracy, and we shall comprehend both the nature
of the cure and the efficacy which it must derive from the Union.
It's entirely possible for a
democracy to have other forms
of economies - like
pure socialism, or even communism, while maintaining democratic governments.
The solution, they argue is to balance
pure democracy - i.e., poll - driven majoritarianism - with strong institutions that respect the civil liberties, even
of the minorities.
Anarchy abolishes all government and makes the enforcement
of individual rights the duty
of other individuals (also a
pure / direct
democracy does this.
While the founders disagreed regarding the role
of the federal government, none sought to build a
pure democracy.
Giving everyone a vote on a single issue, no matter how educated, rich, clever or powerful they are, is the
purest form
of democracy.
Possibly most
of the «socialists» within the Labour Party — like even Tony Benn and Jeremy Corbyn — not being Socialist Workers Party style socialists, did not leave the Party and instead grudgingly accepted our dilution to social
democracy for the main reason that
pure socialism sans in - govt would remain a mere theory and would be worse than practical social democratic reforms / reliefs whilst in power -LRB--- and particularly bebeficial / necessary after a prolonged Thatcherite damage to our society!
Yet the governance
of public schools is one
of the
purest and most responsive forms
of American
democracy.
Instead the community will have the final say over any DApps running on the blockchain, creating a
pure form
of digital
democracy.