A team of scientists at Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) working in collaboration with Tohoku University, Tokyo City University and the Japan Atomic Energy Agency has proposed a novel approach to tackle the problem
of radioactive waste disposal.
Not exact matches
Human groundwater contamination can be related to
waste disposal (private sewage
disposal systems, land
disposal of solid
waste, municipal wastewater, wastewater impoundments, land spreading
of sludge, brine
disposal from the petroleum industry, mine
wastes, deep - well
disposal of liquid
wastes, animal feedlot
wastes,
radioactive wastes) or not directly related to
waste disposal (accidents, certain agricultural activities, mining, highway deicing, acid rain, improper well construction and maintenance, road salt).
There has been a stagnation in the building
of nuclear power stations in Europe as fears concerning safety have mounted, especially in the wake
of the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters, and the problem
of the
disposal and storage
of radioactive waste materials has not been solved.
However, the government is taking on the liabilities for potential accidents and, crucially, the
disposal of radioactive waste should the companies go bust.
Short - term fixes Existing
disposal facilities have adequate capacity for most low - level
radioactive waste and are accessible to
waste generators in the short term, but constraints on the long - term
disposal of class B and C
wastes have become clear, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office last year.
In 1980, Congress passed a law that made states responsible for
disposal of their own
wastes, but states were encouraged to form compacts to locate one low - level
radioactive waste site for several states.
The ultimate aim
of this work is to improve our understanding
of the safe
disposal of radioactive waste underground by studying the unusual diet
of these hazardous
waste eating microbes.
For example, an entire nuclear cycle involving light - water reactors, reprocessing
of the spent fuel, and
disposal of small «packages»
of highly
radioactive nuclear
waste in deep boreholes could prove an attractive option, Moniz noted.
While acknowledging that «no wreck has yet been found that contains toxic or
radioactive waste,» physicist Massimo Scalia
of the University
of Rome, La Sapienza, who has chaired two parliamentary commissions on illegal
waste disposal, argues that other vidence makes their existence «beyond reasonable doubt.»
Over the following decades other treaties expanded the regulations, culminating in a 1993 amendment to the London Dumping Convention that halted the ocean
disposal of all
radioactive waste and in a 1995 amendment to the Basel Convention that banned the deposition
of the industrial world's lethal excreta in developing countries.
Billions
of dollars have been spent to evaluate Yucca Mountain as
disposal site for
radioactive waste since the 1970s.
Since vitrification and
disposal in a federal repository
of highly
radioactive waste is expensive, there is an advantage to first reducing the amount
of the highly
radioactive waste to be vitrified, with the goal
of having to process less volume.
A
disposal site on Yucca Mountain would need to hold up to 77,000 tons
of highly
radioactive nuclear
waste for up to 1 million years.
«I don't believe anyone has taken a look, seriously, at what the unintended consequences are to dealing with these kinds
of materials,» said Theodore Adams, the
radioactive waste disposal consultant.
Though the concept
of borehole
disposal, which would see
radioactive waste entombed far deeper than traditional repositories, has existed for decades, the idea has been revived in recent years, spurred by troubles in finding a long - term home for the country's spent fuel.
Those limits were in keeping with the 1979 law (Public Law 96 - 164, Section 213) that authorized WIPP «a research and development facility to demonstrate the safe
disposal of radioactive wastes from the defense activities and programs
of the United States exempted from regulation by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission» (NRC).
The many serious technical deficiencies
of the Yucca Mountain site and DOE's flawed approach to geologic
disposal notwithstanding, the most potentially explosive aspect
of the federal program is the reality that tens
of thousands
of shipments
of deadly spent nuclear fuel and high - level
radioactive waste will travel the nation's highways and railroads - through 43 states and thousands
of communities, day after day for upwards
of 40 years.
The contract - which includes a one - year base period and four one - year option periods - provides continuing technical assistance and research support to NRC activities related to storage, transportation, possible reprocessing and ultimate geological
disposal of used nuclear fuel and high - level
radioactive wastes.
How to reduce nuclear
wastes or how to treat them including the debris from TEPCO's Fukushima nuclear power stations is discussed; and 3) Environmental radioactivity,
radioactive waste treatment and geological
disposal policy.State -
of - the - art technologies for overall back - end issues
of the nuclear fuel cycle as well as the technologies
of transmutation are presented here.
See Craig, «
Disposal of radioactive wastes in the ocean,» in National Research Council (1957), 34 - 42.
But it offers no viable solutions to the raft
of problems plaguing nuclear power, such as the erosion
of public trust in this energy source in the aftermath
of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, difficulties over the
disposal of radioactive waste and the problem - plagued nuclear fuel recycling program.
Until these risks are properly mitigated and the complete nuclear fuel cycle — from the mining and milling
of uranium to the final
disposal of radioactive wastes — is sufficiently regulated, nuclear power should not be a leading strategy for diversifying America's energy portfolio and reducing carbon pollution.
any nuclear reactor wherever located; any nuclear fuel cycle facility; any
radioactive waste management facility; the transport and storage
of nuclear fuels or
radioactive wastes; the manufacture, use, storage,
disposal and transport
of radioisotopes for agricultural, industrial, medical and related scientific and research purposes; and the use
of radioisotopes for power generation in space objects
to take title to and be responsible for the final disposition
of radioactive waste created by the irradiation, processing, or purification
of uranium leased under this section for which the Secretary determines the producer does not have access to a
disposal path.