Not exact matches
I must admit I haven't read either Cowley or Norton, but I do wonder if Hanna's position, though his
recent article doesn't make it explicit, is not more accurately understood as a
lament on the loss
of amateurism as a virtue in the political establishment (the amateur MP, the eccentric parliamentarian, the independent - minded representative, which
of course gives the Hannan position indirectly: the professionalisation
of politics and political parties, the well - drilled party system and an overbearing executive).
In a
recent article in The New York Times, Jen A. Miller
lamented the use
of smartphones in races, noting that the devices have become «social media spouts for runners to take selfies, FaceTime a family member on a crowded course, or chat on the phone in the middle
of a race, oblivious to the people behind and around them.»
An
article in Forbes
laments a
recent change
of focus in ETF industry conferences from traditional «market - tracking» products to active investment strategies.
The type
of article lamented by a few commenters on my
recent post about food miles vs. food choices made an appearance in Salon a few days ago.
The
article references a
recent post post in John Battelle's Searchblog for the term, and
laments a user's failure to differentiate between what the engines are good at doing (defining words or returning short bursts
of information — when proper search operators are used) and what they do not do well (providing more complex information from a question not likely to be understood by the engine).