Sentences with phrase «of relativity says»

Einstein's general theory of relativity says gravity isn't so much a force as it is an inherent property of space and time.

Science can not prove intuition, yet we believe it exists, science can not explain why we yawn, yet we do everyday, Einsteins theory of relativity says we can not travel than the speed of light, yet we have already clocked a particle moving faster than 186,282 miles per hour.

Not exact matches

And Ellis says Relativity has $ 1 billion in letter - of - intent launch contracts, largely with companies looking to send up midsize satellites about the size of a car.

While Relativity had paid about $ 1 million to use the test stand, the company won an «Announcement of Collaborative Opportunity» contract, which gives Relativity $ 1.5 million from NASA to keep using the E-3 stand, Ellis said.

The joint venture intends to provide sufficient funds to the company so it can resume operations, including the development and distribution of content through Netflix and other platforms, Relativity said.

The venture, UltraV Holdings LLC, will acquire Relativity through a § 363 sale as part of a chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding, the film studio said today.

Relativity and related certain parties plan to file chapter 11 petitions with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, the company said.

What if this man would have say... not believed in Einstein's Theory of Relativity?

In spite of the fact that Hartshorne universally posits a strong sense of relativity to account for omniscience (as well as for other reasons), I will argue that even Hartshorne is forced in important specific cases to attenuate his claims for a strong interpretation of divine relativity; one that says God feels in exactitude the experience of others.

However much we recognize a profound ontological difference between elements of the world, including a fundamental difference between ourselves, many philosophers of religion want to say that God knows and empathizes with human experience in a way similar to divine relativity for several reasons: omniscience, a resolution to theodicy, and ontological unity.

For example, the Bible says that time was created by God when He created the universe.19 Stephen Hawking, George Ellis, and Roger Penrose extended the equations for general relativity to include space and time, demonstrating that time began at the formation of the universe.20 Of course, the biggest coup of the Bible was to declare that the universe had a beginning21 through an expanding universe model.22 The New Testament even declares that the visible creation was made from what was not visible and that dimensions of length, width and height were created by God.23 In addition, the Bible refuted steady - state theory (saying that the creation of matter and energy has ended) 24 long before science made that determinatioof the universe.20 Of course, the biggest coup of the Bible was to declare that the universe had a beginning21 through an expanding universe model.22 The New Testament even declares that the visible creation was made from what was not visible and that dimensions of length, width and height were created by God.23 In addition, the Bible refuted steady - state theory (saying that the creation of matter and energy has ended) 24 long before science made that determinatioOf course, the biggest coup of the Bible was to declare that the universe had a beginning21 through an expanding universe model.22 The New Testament even declares that the visible creation was made from what was not visible and that dimensions of length, width and height were created by God.23 In addition, the Bible refuted steady - state theory (saying that the creation of matter and energy has ended) 24 long before science made that determinatioof the Bible was to declare that the universe had a beginning21 through an expanding universe model.22 The New Testament even declares that the visible creation was made from what was not visible and that dimensions of length, width and height were created by God.23 In addition, the Bible refuted steady - state theory (saying that the creation of matter and energy has ended) 24 long before science made that determinatioof length, width and height were created by God.23 In addition, the Bible refuted steady - state theory (saying that the creation of matter and energy has ended) 24 long before science made that determinatioof matter and energy has ended) 24 long before science made that determination.

Accordingly, when Whitehead says that the relativity principle is the basic doctrine on which his metaphysical system is founded, I take him to mean that it is the most basic principle for the elucidation of the Category of the Ultimate, or, equivalently, of the thesis of solidarity.

He, like Whitehead, will have a «dipolar» God, but in a different way.10 For Hartshorne, the dialectic is between the abstract and the concrete: «The supreme in its total concrete reality will be the supereminent case of relativity, the Surrelative, just as, in its abstract character, it will be the supereminent case of nonrelativity — not only absolute, but the absolute» (DR 76).11 These two poles are not said to be separate entities but are, rather, aspects of a unified divine essence.

To that end, let me first indicate that Whitehead is quoting from his principle of relativity when he says that «it belongs to the nature of every «being» that it is a potential for every «becoming».»

Needless to say, I can not deal here with each and every organic category; but I will examine two — the ontological principle and the Category of the Ultimate — which, because they imply the repeatability of actual entities, are immediately relevant to my interpretation of the relativity principle.

Gravity from space (Einstein's relativity) operates on mass through space and matter interaction is a natural process like centrifugal force which made its appearance when a body is morning in circle Jean mass is the amount of matter that must be present before gravity becomes effective or felt, once this minimum amount of matter is reached or exceeded, gravity with mass interact with space - time to bring geodesics and gravity begin to control other bodies and then orbit around each other, another aspect of the twin effect of gravity and mass is the necessity to account for energy required to sustain gravitating mass and where does this energy originating from Einstein's field equation says from space but never refer to the origin of gravitation.

We have yet to consider the time - factors between the atomic and celestial dimensions of spatial relativities where say a minute our time here upon the celestial goes by and a hundred years goes by if one would be placed within the atomic cosmos.

Or, again, he can say of the term «relativity,» that «to be «constituted in some way by contingent relations» is simply and literally that, no more, no less, and no other» (1970a, 154).

Einstein's Copenhagen Interpretation of 1935 says, «Quantum Mechanics and Relativity require a sentient being outside the universe tom make the universe real.»

Physics is sufficiently advanced today to define many substances very perfectly, in their very essence, in terms of those causes which constitute them, and in this we see that the active relationship by which, let us say, oxygen and hydrogen are defined as causes of water in a given relativity, is an active potency in those causes of dynamic finality with respect to the composite substance which is water.

In the general theory of relativity it has, as von Weizsäcker has said, become a «physical object in the full sense of exercising action and suffering effects.»

When one accepts the invariant order derived from our knowledge of the Principle of Relativity, one must supplement this with the Quantum Theory, allowing for chance, which Northrop says «operates within the restrictions specified by its invariant universal laws.»

And as for not responding to Reality, as a matter of general principle, I thought your were going to say... «as a matter of General Relativity»....

Like Einstein's theory of general relativity... gravity bends space, to say it simply.

Initially he thought that — he was simply explicating what Whitehead should have said or perhaps even wanted to say (The Divine Relativity: A Social Conception of God [New Haven, CN: Yale University Press -LCB- 1948; 1974 -RCB--RSB-, 30 - 31; Charles Hartshorne and William Reese, Philosophers Speak of God [Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1953; 1965], 274; henceforth cited as PSG).

Nurse in the family «working» — which is of course a matter of Anal Catholic Elitist «relativity» (which I say at the risk of upsetting the spirit of Albert Einstein).

«So far, it has not yet been important for the measurements that we've made to actually include general relativity in those simulations,» says Risa Wechsler, a cosmologist at Stanford University and a founding member of the Dark Energy Survey.

With the black hole merger, general relativity has passed the first such test, says Rainer Weiss, a physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, who came up with the original idea for LIGO.

His original mistake, Hawking realised, was in only considering general relativity, which says that nothing — no particles, no heat — can escape the grip of a black hole.

Will says that so far, the measurements don't rule out any specific alternatives to relativity that predict a violation of equivalence.

This flight of fancy, he later said, sowed the seed for special relativity.

From the first images of a black hole to exploring time before the big bang, we're in a new golden age for general relativity, says cosmologist Pedro Ferreira

The Earth may provide a new way to test Einstein's general theory of relativity, says an astronomer in the US.

«We see the larger of the two relativity effects completely visibly in the data,» says physicist and mission leader Francis Everitt of Stanford University.

«We're really looking at probing the predictions of general relativity even more deeply,» says Will.

The potential payoffs in relativity theory are exciting, says project leader Ed Seidel of the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics in Potsdam, Germany.

The experiment appears to tighten limits on possible violations of relativity by a factor of 10 to 100, says Alan Kostelecky, a theorist at Indiana University in Bloomington.

«So far, general relativity has been completely, embarrassingly, exactly correct every time one goes out and looks at it,» says astrophysicist Bradley Schaefer of Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge.

He says that according to the theory of general relativity, time flows like a river, and pumping 1.21 gigawatts of power into the DeLorean somehow allows you to jump streams.

He had just completed the last mile of a decadelong intellectual marathon that made his earlier breakthroughs — special relativity, say, or the discovery of light quanta — look like a sprint.

Special relativity did away with the notion of absolute space and time — Einstein said they were instead «relative» to the observer's conditions — effectively flipping the Newtonian model on its apple - bruised head.

In a lecture in 1975 he said «in my entire scientific life... the most shattering experience has been the realisation that an exact solution of Einstein's equations of general relativity, discovered by the New Zealand mathematician Roy Kerr, provides the absolutely exact representation of untold numbers of massive black holes that populate the Universe.

Gravitation expert Bernard Schutz of the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics in Potsdam, Germany, says he thinks that the mission was worthwhile because general relativity should be checked in a variety of ways.

«It formed a knife,» historian Paul Johnson has said of relativity theory, «to help cut society adrift from its traditional moorings.»

Einstein's equations of relativity dictate the outcome, says co-author Brian Punsly of Boeing Space and Intelligence Systems in Torrance, California.

«Here the general theory of relativity, Einstein's theory of gravity, is no longer valid,» says Eric Poisson of the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada.

With only one tight pair known, he says, it was difficult to assess how common even tighter black hole pairs are, which are crucial in the hunt for gravitational waves — a subtle type of radiation predicted by Einstein's general theory of relativity.

«It's the first time that general relativity is really tested around a supermassive black hole,» says Aurélien Hees at the University of California, Los Angeles.

The results, he says, already rule out a number of suggested alternatives to Einstein's general theory of relativity.

In fact, says astrophysicist Rachel Mandelbaum of Princeton University, «projects like the CFHT Lensing Survey can be used to test theories of dark matter and general relativity.»