The school doesn't want you spreading your poison and you want to cry about not getting free money; just another example
of the religious groups in this country wanting a free lunch while being able to hate on whoever they want.
Our sons are not members
of any religious cults and as far as I know have not murdered or stolen, or otherwise committed a mortal sin.
They were huge supporters
of religious freedom.
The thing is: this guy represents a large portion
of the religious world.
Thousands
of religious people become atheists every day.
Very similar to styles
of religious buildings for Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus.
Due to mostly uneducated and poor nations the political forces in Muslim nations take advantage
of religious ignorance and spread hate among the populations against other religions and the west.
If you study the history
of religious writings, it becomes rather clear that it was MAN who created GOD in man's own image.
Enlightenment Philosophers founded empirical sciences Western theologians attempt to apply empiricism to theology Western theologians agonize over the existence of God Western theologians lose, deemphasize, neglect, marginalize, or explain away the supernatural Western theologians no longer have coherent answers for many practical religious questions Western churches outsource the treatment
of religious problems to secular therapists
- A lack
of religious belief does not preclude «eternal significance» you dumb - ass!
The bad news is that achieving religious comity has come at the price
of religious particularity and theological competence.
They fail to distinguish two types
of religious persons who may be part of this group: the first, who depend completely upon the literal interpretation of Scripture and tradition by an authoritarian pastor, and second, those who undertake rescue activity as the command of God, based upon a thoughtful and self - ratified interpretation of the ethical imperatives of the gospel.
Thank you Ms. Morthole for being a voice of reason in a time when neither the Church nor proponents
of religious freedom sounds anywhere close to rational when discussing women's health.
The interpretation
of the no religious test clause propounded by good people like Bill Bennett and William McGurn would put it at odds with at least two clauses of the First Amendment.
Hillary Clinton has been very clear that people
of religious conviction ought not to have those convictions.
There is a connection between the loss of cultural capital by mainline Protestants and the Religious Right coalition of the 1980s and 1990s, and the rise
of religious populism to fill the vacuum.
they didn't have to do it because of the content of the ads by the irreligious, but because of the reactions
of the religious..
The Supreme Court just upheld the righs
of religious groups to determine their own leadership (completely rejecting claims that discrimination laws applied to them.)
He therefore proposed a constitutional amendment in late 1875 that would have rewritten the First Amendment — applying it to the states, and adding that «no money raised by taxation in any State for the support of public schools... shall ever be under the control
of any religious sect.»
So what you are saying is that no one can disagree with you or ask for proof
of religious assertions.
South Korea authorised their visit, and said in a statement that it could lead to more «in the logic of promoting exchange
of a religious type not political.»
This diminishment
of a religious mind to political activism marks a loss in our understanding of how an intellectual life is made and how a full life is lived.
Most religions avoid discussing the more day to day, human side
of religious development to keep it mythical.
It is also the position
of religious fanatics, of whom there are some here and no doubt many in Turkey.
The airwaves are full
of religious programming.
Where then does the root - commodities
of religious socialisms truly matter and «riotizingly» materialize upon spatterings regarding irrational causations?
Mrs Williams also said: «If the tribunal is suggesting that there are places in which an individual does not enjoy the fundamental right to freedom
of religious expression, this is a cause for concern and could have a chilling effect on freedom of belief and expression.»
In all of these areas we are treated as if we are not to trust our own wisdom and must submit to the mind control
of the religious leadership.
What's laughable is that those other groups that you consider to be asking for special rights are typically just trying to gain equal rights in the face
of religious discrimination... among other things.
You have to account for the lack
of religious freedom in muslim countries.
But by the interpretation
of religious text, It would seem most likley that he would indeed be pro-life.
In this context of aughties - unease, older conservative assumptions of a natural alliance between more libertarian Americans and more socially conservative ones, around the supposedly shared attributes
of religious Liberty, economic Liberty, and political Liberty, with the threat of Islamist terror cast as the substitute for that of Communist domination, fell flat.
Atheism is the rejection
of religious dogma.
He destroyed the Law that would suffocate her under a ton
of religious bondage and a heap of crushing condemnation.
After 2008, I thought obituaries
of the Religious Right were very, very premature.
If the courts are to be taken seriously on questions
of religious liberty, they can not whitewash theological prejudice and the resulting discrimination.
«tolerance
of religious idiocy and ignorance must be stomped out and not be allowed to survive into the proceeding generation.
Kerry Egan observed something as a divinity school student that escaped her divinity school professor... that at or near the moment of truth \ death, up to a lifetime
of religious dogma evaporates, and only reality remains.
Another pitch
of the religious establishment that shameless acknowledges the abuse they do on the weak and ill.
And yet when it comes down to the final moments, when it gets real, when we have no more need for the societal benefits
of religious posturing, we learn what is really most important, and the answer (given the real purpose of life, see above) is what we should reasonably expect: family.
There is nothing anywhere within the construct
of a religious belief system that limits ones faith to a mythological story.
Doesn't matter - none
of the religious calendar dates are anything but arbitrary.
This is a Judo / Christian country where tolerance
of all religious beliefs is followed.
People on both sides
of the religious issue have some insane desire to dictate how other live.
In an era
of religious war, intolerance, and oppression of of non-believers all over the world, the news media should stay away from this sort of thing.
This type
of religious zealot dribble and criticizing is what causes war, death and hatred for fellow man / woman... all in the name of religion.
Our religious diversity, he contends, is a source of our strength, so long as we act in accordance with our heritage
of religious toleration.
During the Reformation, Anabaptists insisted on following literally Jesus» command not to swear any oath, while Calvinists and Lutherans adhered to the traditional Roman Catholic use
of religious oaths as an important expression of the religious foundations of political obligations.
For there will always be a need for religiously orientated folks and come hell freezing over, there needs for some semblances
of religious spirituality will ever be a flourishing detraction from all the slings and arrows of all those bitter and jealous freaks who seem not able to fathom religious wholesomeness.
Nothing quite like the smell
of religious morons early in the day.