At the end of the day, what really matters is that a lot
of religious people feel the necessity to impose their views on people who believe otherwise.
Not exact matches
Such a new ecclesiastical body is designed to allow these pathetic human beings, who are so deeply locked into a world that no longer exists, to form a community in which they can continue to hate gay
people, distort gay
people with their hopeless rhetoric and to be part
of a
religious fellowship in which they can continue to
feel justified in their homophobic prejudices for the rest
of their tortured lives.
Religious feelings maybe, but how many
people have had «god experiences» that are credibly witnessed, authenticated and
of public record?
Thanks for giving voice to so many
of us,
people like myself, who often
feel as though we are slogging our way through the
religious wilderness
of fear and judgmentalism.
It's wrong for the public restaurant installation to assert its
religious belief particularly much favorable toward Chriatian faith diners; the mood should be like acceptace
of all racial,
religious backgrounds, and particularly for gay
people not to
feel discriminated and hurt!
I don't
feel the need to cater to the religiously naive and uneducated by acting like there's a difference especially when these same
religious folk would surely deem a
person of an opposing religion / view that heard voices crazy.
Those
of the
religious agenda keep on telling themselves that whoever this
person that wrote it should be more involved with religion and should keep on pushing the «topic
of religion» onto dying
people instead
of just being a human being and focusing on the
person's
feelings at their last hours on earth.
Ultimately, much
of this is a result
of the modern «competitive» paradigm
of religious communities: being right, having the truth, drawing
people into the light from the dark, etc. all becomes about
feeling good about ones own membership and being part
of those who are «right».
Those
people who were in the Klan or any other
religious organization claimed to be closer to God and
felt they had the right to proclaim others way
of life as wrong.
As I'm writing this, I can see all the
religious people saying all atheists should be fired because they bring the devil into the place
of work... so I
feel the need to provide the caveat: conflict with their objectives in a way that is sanely and reasonably shown.
The reason that it's hard to convince some
people that there is an almighty is because we
religious people have created the almighty in our own image — in images
of forms that we can see,
feel, taste, touch, imagine etc. and using properties
of time, matter or space that do not actually exist!
Jura Nanuk, founder & President
of Central - European
Religious Freedom Inst.itute, wrote the minister an open letter in which she stated: «Did it ever occur to you that instead
of pretending to be a victim due to your hurt
feelings you might show some compassion for
people who were taken to the brink
of extinction by your ancestors?
I believe a lot
of the anxiety
religious people feel toward some secular ideas is that they will have to completely abandon all their current beliefs at once (like this pastor) before they can embrace new ideas.
i do nt understand what religous
people really believe is waiting for them in an afterlife when we know for a fact that the body doesn't go there and the fact that animals apparently cant go to heaven because they have no soul is well thats just good old conceited man made rubbish that is everywhere in the bible and before i get attacked i was raised
religious and got very
religious for a few years till i actually thought about it and applyed logic to it after that the whole concept
of religion made me
feel sick
So should we take the tendency for certain
people to get
religious feelings about Apple as evidence for the legitimacy
of claims that Steve Jobs is god?
Each
person saw and
felt the spirit
of God working through the
religious community and knew himself to be a part
of the priesthood
of all believers.
When the mass insecurities fostered by a society in rapid transition reinforce the
feeling of vulnerability derived from personal autonomy,
people tend to «escape from freedom»; they lose their anxiety but also their freedom by overidentifying with some authoritarian ideology, leader, or system, political or
religious.
It was only after he found fame as an adult that his followers, like those
of any
religious or cult leader,
felt the need to embellish his birth to supernatural status and fit it into to the expectations
of the
people they were trying to convince or influence.
So why do
people with
religious experiences assert that their
feelings of God's presence are valid and believable, but when another
person who has never experienced God admits this, they are told that they...
I
feel that the
religious excitement that is supposed to come to
people who meditate on the flame
of a single dark candle in an otherwise dark room was no greater than the pleasure I
felt when I looked down a gun - sight and become very close to my own mind and consciousness.
In a new industrial district, for example, only a single church can be built for all, yet it has to be used by
people of the most heterogeneous artistic taste, so that to one a crucifix may seem blasphemous which others find a most genuine expression
of their
religious feelings.
Because he is a
religious authority figure,
people spontaneously project on him a rich variety
of associations from their early life, including powerful
feelings about such matters as God, heaven, hell, sex, parents, Sunday school, death, sin, and guilt.
When patients are hospitalized they often
feel estranged from their community life; thus, the provision
of religious activities while they are hospitalized may serve to provide continuity, as well as the primary nurturance that
persons may receive from their
religious participation.
It's unfortunate but its left me with a tainted impression
of Christians and
religious people as a whole, that I just can't seem to shake I
feel awful for it.
A report by the Woolf Institute - released to coincide with the anniversary
of the 7/7 bombings - has found that
religious people are more likely to
feel connected to their community than their country.
Author John Charles Cooper, dean
of academic affairs at Winebrenner Theological Seminary, sums up the situation: «
People do feel that religion is losing its influence on society, and they may be right — but the majority of people do not wish this to be true, and so it is an important time to be publishing good religious
People do
feel that religion is losing its influence on society, and they may be right — but the majority
of people do not wish this to be true, and so it is an important time to be publishing good religious
people do not wish this to be true, and so it is an important time to be publishing good
religious books.
... No, this has been the
feeling of most
people all along, that you do nt push your
religious beliefs on others at the cost
of taking away their right to the pursuit
of happiness.
«We've been clear that
people need to be able to
feel strong in their
religious identities and are making sure that the voices
of people of faith are heard in Government.»
They call them peddlers
of religion, and they do not mean that in a positive way, but rather are referring to
people they believe are trying to push their own agenda
of a psuedo -
religious toxic mix
of some sort
of religious something, politics, power, control, personal profit (think $ $ $) and efforts to
feel good about ones self while at the same time looking down on neighbors (condescension) rather than loving neighbors.
Yet it can not be denied that there are, even today, many who are sincere in their acknowledgment
of feeling a deep need for mystery in their lives — and such
people are generally members
of some kind
of religious group.
you, on the other hand, seem to want to shut down
religious discussion because you are afraid
of people getting their
feelings hurt.
The success
of cultural and
religious movements inevitably reveals that many
people already share the new ideals but do not
feel empowered until there is a credible public call to action.
Why can't we all just mind our own business when it comes to
peoples bedrooms and wedding albums, neither side get's to preach in schools, though I understand how you would think
of it as the atheist getting his way by just not having you preach your God to his children in a publicly funded school, but he's not sending an atheist spokesman to influence your children, he just doesn't
feel it's right to allow the
religious spokesman into the schools to influence any children on his tax dollar.
The task for the morning was to identify the
religious feelings of people we work with, especially among the excluded majority.
I've met a lot
of people, both
religious and non-
religious, who
feel like me that they were called here in some strange way.
As established, culturally supported
religious practices and traditional communities have weakened, many
people feel the need for some way
of dealing with their inner stress and emptiness.
Now, having said all that, why does ANYONE
feel so compelled to stamp their
religious symbol on a site where
people of many faiths (or non-faith) died, knowing full well that it's going to upset the families
of these individuals?
People refusing medical treatment because they think they can pray disease away, The demoralizing way religion makes you
feel about yourself (I am a wretch, a sinner, a bad
person by nature), the
religious wars that have been fought for millenia, the self righteous passing laws based on THEIR beliefs (change to the pledge
of allegience which now excludes anyone who does not believe in a fairy godfather, the change to the national motto that turned it into the lie «in god we trust», the bigotry that «my religion is the right one and you are wrong so I'll pray for you» kind
of crap... don't you realize that it is insulting to me when someone says they will pray for me... its the same as saying I'm going to do something for you but there won't be any effect, so it is just a waste
of time.
Nor need I
feel shame that I do not respect the «
religious rights»
of people whose god tells them that I deserve to be slaughtered.
And fourth was the freedom
felt by
persons outside
of church to use
religious symbols.
Get over yourselves and your smug
feeling of superiority over
people that have
religious convictions.
But we now have gone to «winter break» and «spring break», because
people felt that giving children time off from school for
religious holidays was pretty darn close to violating the sacred seperation
of church and state.
† Just because a Blind Christian has the need to
feel as if they posses a traditional family lifestyle,
religious holidays where the give their kids chocolate eggs, dvd gifts on christmas
of movies full
of women acting as the equals
of men (Against the bible), a lack
of understanding culture, and the
feeling of belonging, does not mean all
people need / want / or
feel that way.
He spoke
of the prestige
of science in our culture and the corresponding lack
of respect for religion («If it's a science programme it's a documentary, if the subject's politics there's a debate, but a
religious programme, unless it's hymns for granny, will have
people talking about their
feelings»).
In Judaism, despite the rather far - reaching differences between the orthodox, conservative, and liberal wings, and the existence
of national variants, including pro- and anti-Zionists, there is a definite, overall consciousness among practically all Jews everywhere
of being one (a qahal, or
people), and this
feeling is predominantly a
religious feeling.
«It is basically making fun
of atheists who
feel superior to
religious people (or maybe anti-theists).
Thomas Jefferson
felt this overwhelming sovereignty
of God over all things, because he wrote (in his bill for
religious liberty in Virginia) that no sooner did a
person become aware
of the proper relation between creature and Creator, to whom the creature's very existence is owed, than the creature becomes aware
of a self - evident duty to worship and give thanks to so infinitely superior a Being.
To which almost every
religious leader said that those types
of discussions might make their church attendees
feel «uncomfortable» and a few admitted because it would drive
people away who they count on for larger donations.
On the contrary, I
feel that there must be a void in the lives
of religious people to
feel that they need to force themselves to keep believing in these silly myths in order to have a reason to do good things and be good
people... that it's not enough for them to be «good» for the sake
of goodness, for the sake
of our society and our world... that they must believe that there is to be some great reward for themselves or some great punishment after death in order to motivate them to be good.
Of course, one of the main problems is that there are many people who don't want to understand each other, or they feel they already understand the religious other because some book told them what others believed or some member of their religious community did all the research for them so they wouldn't have to do it themselves and told them what others believe
Of course, one
of the main problems is that there are many people who don't want to understand each other, or they feel they already understand the religious other because some book told them what others believed or some member of their religious community did all the research for them so they wouldn't have to do it themselves and told them what others believe
of the main problems is that there are many
people who don't want to understand each other, or they
feel they already understand the
religious other because some book told them what others believed or some member
of their religious community did all the research for them so they wouldn't have to do it themselves and told them what others believe
of their
religious community did all the research for them so they wouldn't have to do it themselves and told them what others believed.