I hear a lot
of religious talk about how following God will lead to suffering and pain.
However, when he was first introduced to the program — by an atheist, ironically — he had one problem:
all of the religious talk.
Not exact matches
When a CNN producer
talked to him shortly after the London bombings, he boasted that his son's heroism had marked the advent
of a 50 - year
religious war and demanded $ 5,000 (5,600 euros) for a televised interview.
Why are you listening to black clerics over this issue, Blacks are having more kids out
of wed lock than whites, they are also like white, living in sin, but the church's say nothing about having babies without a husband or sitting in church and living in sin,
talk about glass houses, and besides the marriages are Cival marriage not
religious marriage, what a bunch
of hipocrites..
The more educated one becomes the less
religious one is... when you see educated politicians and professional people
of all kinds
talking religiousness it's lip service for the ignorant... it's part
of their job... other wise there's trouble from the little people.
Among those surprised by all
of conservative TV host Glenn Beck's recent
religious talk - including at Saturday's Washington rally, where Beck said that «America today begins to turn back to God,» - is the Rev. Richard Land, a Southern Baptist leader.
Even though they were and are completely devoid
of what you call «God
talk» and certainly displayed no hint
of bending over backwards to keep «God» in my
religious jargon, you once again seek to malign me by falsely representing me.
Lately with all the
talk of «Dominionism» and the scary
religious right and Frank Schaeffer chiming in, I feel the need to draw attention to a biography
of Francis Schaeffer that I think really portrayed him fairly and without the usual political histrionics.
Next time one
of you
Religious People «
Talk» to God, could you let him know my Communications Gear is NOT working, and to try an alternate system.
I am
talking about their
religious values / morals / laws and how they should be kept out
of our nation's legal system.
Religious leaders free themselves from the obligation
of talking about evil, by pretending that it's only a matter
of free will and people can choose what they want and the consequences are only personal («between you and God»).
Whether the critiques provided are correct or wrong,
religious TV and media gives us the opportunity to reflect on our way
of life and
talk with others about religion.
Ted said: «I am
talking about their
religious values / morals / laws and how they should be kept out
of our nation's legal system.»
Even if you take the
religious aspect out
of it, it is still interesting those on their death bed want to
talk about family.
The kind
of reasonable, sound THINKING theology and
religious / faith ideas those
of us as are here
talking about, simply doesn't lend itself to a pop culture.
I remember watching his science videos in elementary school but now whenever I see him on the news
talking about science it seems like he is politicizing science (when it comes to climate change) and promoting evolution as the only option to the creation
of the world to try and discredit the
religious community.
I listen to how they
talk about matters
of faith, religion, what they watch on their favorite
religious tv programs, often listening as well to their radios playing their favored «Christian music» radio stations in the background, what are in the lyrics.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool
of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very
religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are
talking about Atheism as a
religious view not debating the existence
of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden
of proof falls in your lap as it is the base
of your religion.
I get a kick out
of the Atheist
talking about how
religious people try and ram their faith down throats... and then you see clowns like hippypoet and the prayer is not healthy kook... guess they are hypocrits just like everybody elese.
Now, as you
talk of UV light and water and oxygen (and yes, this is not my field
of science), but I do care to read other hypothesis given forth to explain things, before jumping to believe what a
religious scripture or actually its Church wants me to believe.
The Vatican is NOT
talking about those people who are the majority
of Catholic
religious.
Am sick and tired
of this
talk about the
religious and the non
religious things being taken as an excuse to squeeze crashing down those nations or countries... innocent peaceful people are the first to pay the price in such conflicts and wars..
They
talk about an attack on
religious teachings while speaking at an NRA event about how abortion is murdering unborn children while at the same time wanting to go to war and bomb thousands
of innocent men, women, children, as well as innocent pregnant women with unborn babies.
It seems that you have filled your mind to the max
of things to prove to
religious people that you know what you are
talking about.
the «logic»
of a
religious person: X: I think people who are dying should
talk about god, because god is totally awesome!
Nobody ever
talks about the sign in front
of almost every house
of worship
talking about the coming sermon, or any other form
of religious advertising — and those outnumber anything atheists do by an order
of magnitude.
Much as
religious types like to
talk out
of both sides
of their mouths at the same time, you don't get to have it both ways.
Lets vote for Romney who
talks about
religious abuse and yet his religion is abusing the religion
of others continually... bet he does nt suspend his money to them... they just wait till people are dead then baptise them... this is an extremist religion and not one we want for president
its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm
talking about, you assume to know what something is about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than
religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its about being aware
of who you are?
LogicMinded: you're
talking about corruption
of power, which exists for both
religious and non-
religious regimes.
Such straightforwardly
religious talk may,
of course, seem alien to the common life
of our society, and no doubt it is to some degree.
Dr. Peter Boghossian, professor
of philosophy at Portland State University, in a great
talk on faith - based epistemology: «I disagree with granting
religious delusion as an exemption, and I want to mention there's a budding young scholar here at Portland State University, Renee Barnett [sp?]
«Nobody seems to be
talking about the implications
of having a very
religious Mormon president,» Silverman said.
In Matthew 12:31 - 32, which
talks about the sin that will not be forgiven, it is true that some sort
of denial is taking place by
religious leaders who accuse Jesus
of performing His miracles by the power
of the devil.
Yes he
talked of hell, but not to the sinners, only the
religious people who closed the door
of heaven in the common peoples face.
They look at the context
of Matthew 12 and notice that it is the Jewish
Religious leaders Jesus was
talking to, and they did not accept Jesus as the Messiah, nor listen to the Holy Spirit's testimony about Him.
Stephen in his blog
talks about the problem
of religious literacy.
Almost 80 percent
of Americans identify themselves as Christians, with, despite all the
talk about growing
religious pluralism, no more than 5 per cent claiming other religions.
Not many people are
talking about this because
of fear
of the
religious implications.
We are not just
talking about a convergence
of disciplines, but
of an authentically global synthesis in which the various forms
of knowledge... find common ground in a shared personal and social vision... We must not imagine that the socio - cultural challenge
of today can be met with theological thought that specialises in the content
of doctrine or concentrates on
religious experience.
If understanding our case as above all a matter
of protecting
religious liberty rights means that social conservatives don't think or
talk that way anymore, then we are in great trouble.
At one point, he paused and began to
talk about the
religious nature
of the medical school.
Again, we may notice that the model used to picture God in much popular
religious talk, and in some theological
talk too, was borrowed, as Whitehead noted in his Modes
of Thought (Free Press, 1968, p. 49), from «the characteristics
of the touchy, vain, imperious tyrants who ruled the empires
of the world.»
CNN's Brooke Baldwin
talks to Rafael Romo about a
religious cult whose members were believed to be victims
of sex slavery.
For example, he
talks about the heresies
of «justification by faith alone» (p. 237), annihilationism, hyper - preterism (p. 242), Openness
of God, and
Religious Inclusivism (p. 281).
Instead, after 1938 Hitler began to publicly support a Nazified version
of science, particularly social Darwinism, at the core
of Nazi ideology in place
of a
religious one — a development that is reflected in private in his increasingly hostile remarks towards religion in Table
Talk.
Jules suggests to me that as many as eighty per cent
of techies are
religious, but that this number is highly uncertain because the subject matter is taboo among most modern scientists; it's not something we
talk about in our daily working lives.
He writes, for example: «The fact that our author can persistently
talk about sacrifice as if it meant a joyless, unwilling and hesitant gift shows that not even the faintest spark
of religious inspiration can have glowed in his heart» (p26).
Perhaps, so far in this
talk, you've been waiting for me to be more specific about the different types
of vocation, such as priesthood,
religious life, marriage and the single life.
sounds
religious to me (yes, im
talking about the scientist that tells you we know the age
of the universe..