It is a failure
of responsible gun owners to properly limit access to arms from disturbed individuals.
Thoughts
of a responsible gun owner and follower of Christ: After a quick read of this acticle, the author's biblical based quotes and interpretations seem true.
Not exact matches
«We recognize and appreciate that the vast majority
of gun owners in this country are
responsible, law - abiding citizens.
«We support and respect the Second Amendment, and we recognize and appreciate that the vast majority
of gun owners in this country are
responsible, law - abiding citizens,» Stack wrote.
My grandfather bought me my first NRA membership when I was young, and I have the same pride he and many Americans feel at being
responsible gun owners, becoming excellent marksmen and joining in the camaraderie
of hunting.
I don't want the gov» t to come into my home checking that I'm being a
responsible adult... In New Hampshire, where I live, there are few
gun laws... one
of them is you can store and keep a firearm however you want... but if a child gets a hold
of it, whatever happens is on you the
owner of the firearm.
The facts remain that almost ALL
of the
guns used in crimes came from «
responsible»
gun owners, and you are far more likely to be killed by a
gun if you own a
gun.
With 300 million firearms in private hands (one - third
of them pistols), the overwhelming majority
of gun owners ARE
responsible, law - abiding citizens, which is why these horrific massacres are not commonplace, but rather horrific outliers that can never be legislated away (e.g. DC, Chicago, and «
Gun Free Zones»).
There will always be people that abuse rights, but the vast majority
of gun owners are very
responsible and would have avoided, or at least minimized, some
of these terrible incidents had they been armed.
We will see it again when
responsible gun owners choose not to report their ownership
of their assault weapons (in Feinstein's proposal).
I understand that there are
responsible and law abiding
gun owners in our country — and I want to respect that — but I hope they understand the stories
of my neighborhood and my efforts to stop the shooting.
«The four bills I am introducing in the assembly would roll back some requirements
of the NY - SAFE Act that are an unnecessary burden on
responsible gun owners.»
«Over the past two years, I've received numerous letters and phone calls from constituents who are
responsible gun owners, and who have some very valid objections to some
of the most burdensome aspects
of this law,» said Brindisi, a Utica Democrat.
I don't see any hypocrisy in a
responsible gun owners wanting to keep
guns out
of the hands
of the mentally ill.
While we recognize that
gun ownership is legal, and that most
gun owners are
responsible citizens, we nevertheless regard the proliferation
of guns in our communities as a major public health problem with devastating consequences for children and their families.
There are tons
of responsible, trained, licensed
gun owners, and you may be a
responsible dog
owner but without regulation nobody else has to be.
Gun shop
owner Knowing that we apply common sense to other issues in our society, specifically like holding irresponsible people accountable for their actions when they drink and drive and kill somebody, and we do that without restricting control
of cars and cells phones to the rest
of us, the good guys, why then do you and Hillary want to control and restrict and limit
gun manufacturers,
gun owners and
responsible use
of guns and ammunition to the rest
of us, the good guys, instead
of holding the bad guys accountable for their actions?