Sentences with phrase «of resurrection of the dead»

Perhaps today the doctrine of the resurrection of the dead is simply too particular, too specific, too... biblical.

Therefore what you worship in ignorance, this I proclaim to you...... 32 Now when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some began to sneer, but others said, «We shall hear you again concerning this.»

Is it possible that the reason that the Corinthians were so concerned about baptism is that they had been taught by the Apostle Paul and other Christian evangelists that salvation and the promise of the resurrection of the dead and eternal life are received in Baptism, just as orthodox Christians, including Lutherans, have been teaching for almost 2,000 years??

This approach appeals to many people, although it does not seem to do complete justice to the biblical accounts / expectations of the resurrection of the dead, and it seems to minimize God's active role in the process.

Paul set out to convince them of the resurrection of the dead by reminding them of the proclamation of the resurrection of Jesus, which was central to the Gospel they had already received, and which they do not seem to have doubted.

This Gospel concerned «His Son, who was born of the seed of David according to the flesh; who was appointed Son of God with power according to the Spirit of holiness from the time of the resurrection of the dead — Jesus Christ our Lord.»

There, Paul called the expectation of a resurrection of the dead the presupposition for the recognition of Jesus» resurrection: «If the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised» (1 Cor.

The contrast, which out of concern for the truth I have found it necessary to draw between the courageous and joyful primitive Christian hope of the resurrection of the dead and the serene philosophic expectation of the survival of the immortal soul, has displeased not only many sincere Christians in all Communions and of all theological outlooks, but also those whose convictions, while not outwardly alienated from Christianity, are more strongly moulded by philosophical considerations.

In the story of Paul's address to the Athenians, it is at this point that conflict becomes acute between his faith and theirs: «When they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked.»

not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, 2of the doctrine of baptisms, of laying on of hands, of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.

Hbr 6:1 - 2 Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God, of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.

The second, and only other, explicit mention of the resurrection of the dead to be found in the Old Testament is in the book of Daniel.

What do you think of the claim of the resurrection of the dead, and why?

Not exact matches

Both the Christian celebration of Jesus» resurrection from the dead and our sharing in it through baptism, and the Jewish Passover celebration of their deliverance from slavery and oppression are understood in the light of the Exodus.

«And have hope toward God, which they themselves also allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust.»

The references to baptisms for the dead is by Paul — IN SUPPORT — of his argument that the resurrection is a reality.

This chapter shows how Paul was trying to convince the Corinthians that the resurrection of Jesus Christ actually occured... in his support, he said in verse 29, «Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all?

If you read the article a little closer you will see that the scriptural reference used comes from the Bible's New Testament, where Paul having a discussion regarding the resurrection, asks why would followers of Christ at his time perform baptisms for dead if there were to be no resurrection.

My point was according to doctrine of the time, resurrections were fairly commonplace (in comparison to modern times, when we know the dead can not come back to life) and therefore not so special.

Gone are the virgin birth, divine healings, exorcisms and the resurrection of the dead, all of which the chief executive dismissed as «superstitions, fanaticisms and fabrications.»

The apostle Paul speaks to the resurrection of the dead in Romans 15 and in doing so comments on the dead.

When you read the context and see that Paul was speaking on the subject of those who don't believe in the resurrection, but believed in baptism as Christians, you realize that he was saying that what is the point of baptism if you are only going to end up dead.

But 1 Corinthians 15:21 - 22 teaches, «for since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.

Please read I Corinthians 15 in its entirety and you'll find that the chapter has nothing to do with «baptizing for the dead» as the Mormons practice it but rather the fact that baptism is symbolic of the death, burial and resurrection.

No Visti of the Magi No star of the East No flight to Egypt to escape the massacre of innocents No meeting with Satan and flying around the mountains No Earthquake No Last Supper No Foot washing rite No Temple curtain tearing No resurrection of dead saints Nothing about his actions in the Temple over turning the money changers tables.

'» Or as the Catechism of the Catholic Church puts it: «The bodies of the dead must be treated with respect and charity, in faith and hope of the Resurrection.

Resurrection of Dead Saints Dan 12:1 - 2 Nothing about the moneychangers and his actions Isa.

# No Visit of the Magi # No star of the East # No flight to Egypt to escape the massacre of innocents # No meeting with Satan and flying around the mountains # No Earthquake # No Last Supper # No Foot washing rite # No Temple curtain tearing # No resurrection of dead saints # Nothing about his actions in the Temple over turning the money changers tables.

I choose to place my faith and hope in Jesus Christ and the resurrection of the dead.

This interpretation is grounded in biblical themes — the vision of the Hebrew prophets of a branch growing from the seemingly dead stump of the Davidic royal line, and, of course, the central Christian affirmation of the death and resurrection of Jesus.

The resurrection does and never will make sense, it is not a fact and there is no proof or can there be that it happened A fairytale like the dead being able to conduct war in the Lord of the Rings.

13 If there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised.

Overall, 37 percent of Americans believe there will be a bodily resurrection of the dead, compared to 72 percent who express a positive belief that there is life after death.

A general resurrection of the dead is something orthodox Christians across the centuries have long anticipated.

This way, I hoped, nobody would mistake the resurrection of the dead for a near - death experience or the «zombie apocalypse.»

In the earliest period, for example, the appointment of Jesus as son of God came only after his resurrection from the dead (cf. Rom.

I find it ihighly ronic that you not chose a Hindi god of resurrection as a a comparison for a god who didn't raise from the dead, you chose one with some highly similar (and far earlier) story details in common with the Christ story.

When the Gospel according to Matthew uses the story of Jonah as a symbol of resurrection from the dead, (Matthew xii.

I also think that when the church chose «Easter» to celebrate the day Jesus rose from the dead, they did this intentionally because of what the resurrection of Jesus signifies.

The pagan Greeks and Romans cremated their dead, but the Jews who believed in the resurrection of the body laid their dead to rest in tombs.

That's not about doctrines of «repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, of instruction about washings and laying on of hands, and the resurrection of the dead and eternal judgment.»

There are all sorts of ways even ordinary people can BS a «resurrection» — and besides, Lazarus was raised from the dead, and no one claims he was divine.

The restoration of Israel, in fact, will have the character of a resurrection from the dead.

12Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?

concerning his Son, who was born of the seed of David [as far as his human nature went], but who was marked out as the Son of God with power [by the holy Spirit] through resurrection from the dead — Jesus Christ our Lord.»

2.9 - 11); he is made «Lord and Christ» as the inauguration of eschatological existence at Pentecost (Acts 2.36); in this sense he is «appointed Son of God according to the Spirit of holiness by the resurrection of the dead» (Rom.

Jesus taught the resurrection of the dead.

Acts 17:22 - 31 is not formal teaching, but is logical presentation at a gathering of philosophers for the existence of the one, true God, and the resurrection of Jesus from the dead.

The Sadducees do not believe in an afterlife, let alone a resurrection, which is why Paul had to say that if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is preached in vain.

«Because the Orthodox Faith affirms the fundamental goodness of creation, it understands the body to be an integral part of the human person and the temple of the Holy Spirit, and expects the resurrection of the dead.