Sentences with phrase «of revision surgery»

A multivariable model was then used to determine independent risk factors for the performance of revision surgery.

The results suggest that the risk of revision surgery and most other complications of shoulder arthroplasty increases along with BMI in obese patients.

«These data will provide valuable information in preoperative counseling for patients and physicians regarding patient and procedural characteristics associated with higher rates of revision surgery,» the authors conclude.

Not exact matches

The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, codes were used to determine patients» co-existing conditions and complications after surgery.

The research team, led by the University of Bristol, conducted a study that reviewed patient data from 44 studies to compare the effectiveness of the two types of surgery currently used to treat infections — one - stage and two - stage revisions.

Published revision rates for septorhinoplasty procedures in the current facial plastic surgery literature are limited to a small number of studies focused on a single institution or a single surgeon.

Patient characteristics associated with increased revision were younger age, being female, having a history of anxiety or autoimmune disease, and surgery for cosmetic or congenital nasal deformities, the study suggests.

A study from Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) finds that in morbidly obese patients, bariatric surgery performed prior to a total hip or knee replacement can reduce in - hospital and 90 - day postoperative complications and improve patient health, but it does not reduce the risk of needing a revision sSurgery (HSS) finds that in morbidly obese patients, bariatric surgery performed prior to a total hip or knee replacement can reduce in - hospital and 90 - day postoperative complications and improve patient health, but it does not reduce the risk of needing a revision ssurgery performed prior to a total hip or knee replacement can reduce in - hospital and 90 - day postoperative complications and improve patient health, but it does not reduce the risk of needing a revision surgerysurgery.

Levels of pain, assessment of general health, complications, the need for revision surgery, and mortality were measured postoperatively for up to four years.

Only five per cent of patients require revision surgery over a 10 - year period.

Because of the higher revision rate of partial knee replacement surgery, which is traditionally regarded as the most important factor to determine the choice of implant, its use in the treatment of end - stage osteoarthritis is controversial, with only about 7,000 being performed annually in the UK.

For patients undergoing shoulder joint replacement surgery (arthroplasty), higher body mass index is linked to increased complications — including the need for «revision» surgery, reports a study in the June 7 issue of The Journal of Bone & Joint Ssurgery (arthroplasty), higher body mass index is linked to increased complications — including the need for «revision» surgery, reports a study in the June 7 issue of The Journal of Bone & Joint Ssurgery, reports a study in the June 7 issue of The Journal of Bone & Joint SurgerySurgery.

Patients who received a revision joint replacement surgery, a TJR following a fracture, patients with a history of blood clots, or patients taking hormone replacement therapy were excluded from the study.

«The reasons for revision surgery are varied and can include infection, instability and loosening of the prostheses, and the need for revision can occur within the first few months after implantation,» Pourzal says.

Main Outcomes and Measures Revision surgery after an index septorhinoplasty was the main outcome measure, and the rate of revision was calculated within subgroups of patients based on different demographic and clinical characteRevision surgery after an index septorhinoplasty was the main outcome measure, and the rate of revision was calculated within subgroups of patients based on different demographic and clinical characterevision was calculated within subgroups of patients based on different demographic and clinical characteristics.

Of patients undergoing revision surgery, the median time to revision was 1.2 years after the index procedure, while 50.0 % of patients underwent revision between 8 months and 2.3 yearOf patients undergoing revision surgery, the median time to revision was 1.2 years after the index procedure, while 50.0 % of patients underwent revision between 8 months and 2.3 yearof patients underwent revision between 8 months and 2.3 years.

We are very enthusiastic regarding the ongoing development of our orthopedic services including lameness diagnosis, trauma care, non-emergent orthopedic surgery (cranial cruciate ligament rupture, medial patellar luxation), limb deformity, minimally invasive surgery, arthroscopy, total joint replacement, orthopedic revision surgery, sports medicine, physical rehabilitation, and regenerative medicine.

Consumers have reported side effects of the BioMet hip replacements such as severe pain, swelling and difficulty walking, and many have required hip revision surgery.

The National Joint Registry of England & Wales found that revision rates were higher for surgeries using these products at the five - year point.

While artificial hips are supposed to last at least 15 years, DePuy was forced to recall its ASR devices nearly four years ago in the wake of rising device failure rates, with many patients having to undergo revision surgery within five years of getting their device.

With a Monday, January 6, 2014 deadline looming for people looking to avail of a multibillion - dollar DePuy ASR settlement deadline, many of those who were forced to undergo revision surgery to replace their faulty hip implants are rushing to meet the deadline to register their claim.

It noted, «Thus, the «revision» surgery for that fracture was simply further treatment of the initial injury.»

The insurance company took the position that, because Conners had failed to follow medical advice during his recovery from the first surgery, his negligence (and not the accident) was the cause of the nonunion, the revision surgery, and the resulting drug reaction.

Depuy Hip Implants — Involving the Pinnacle Implant — where the patient has had to undergo a removal and replacement of the implant (a revision surgery).

Bone fractures, joint dislocations, improperly positioned components, infection, defective stem designs, and poor cementing techniques may contribute to the loosening of stem components and the need for a revision surgery.

In particular, he carries out a large number of revision spinal procedures in patients who have had previous spinal surgery elsewhere.

Some defective hip implant patients have needed revision surgery to remove the implant, which creates a separate set of risks.

The FDA stated that the use of a Transvaginal mesh implant like the Bard Avaulta, Johnson & Johnson, American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific, and other vaginal mesh is no more effective compared to other surgeries yet is much more likely to cause injury and require revision surgery.

(Because of the nature of these particular hip systems, revision surgery can prove particularly challenging to perform and traumatic for the patient.)

Two months before the recall, Stryker is reported to have put out a warning to medical professionals and affected parties over concern that the rubbing together of its parts could Adverse Local Tissue Reaction, including necrosis, metallosis, osteolysis, tumor - like formations, and pain serious enough to warrant revision surgery.

In 2010, reports disclosed that approximately 9 % of people with the Zimmer NexGen CR - Flex Porous Femoral component knee replacement required a revision surgery within two years.

Hip Implant Failure Any type of hip implant failure likely means that the patient will have to undergo at least one another revision surgery to have the device removed and replaced.

In her hip injury lawsuit, Lincoln claims that her ABG II system implant caused her to develop a number of health issues, including metallosis, and she has been forced to undergo revision surgery.

Recent studies have shown that 24 % of patients who had revision surgery experienced worsening symptoms.

Many transvaginal mesh manufacturers such as Johnson & Johnson and C. R. Bard have stopped selling their mesh devices after thousands of women have complained of severe pain, limited mobility and the need for revision surgery.

Many doctors have stopped using the devices as companies halt sales amid allegations of mesh side effects, including severe pain, limited mobility and revision surgery.

The Gynecare Prolift is the subject of the first transvaginal mesh lawsuit to go to trial in New Jersey, where Linda Gross alleges the device failed and required 18 revision surgeries.

The Saskatchewan Ministry of Health turned down their request to cover the revision surgery because it will not fund out - of - country medical procedures.

The cases being filed by Georgia DePuy Hip Implant lawyers seek compensation for the patients to cover the cost of having a second revision surgery.

One internal analysis in 2011 is said to have found that close to 36 % of the devices would likely failed within five years - way below generally accepted standards that say that no more than 5 % of patients should undergo revision hip replacement surgery during this timeframe.

The FDA issued a mesh warning after receiving an influx of complaints from patients who allege that their transvaginal mesh device were causing severe complications, pain and sometimes revision surgery.

As with any kind of surgery, there are risks involved and, in certain circumstances, more than one revision procedure may be required.

The FDA has reported various complications associated with hernia mesh products, including intestinal adhesions (occurs when parts of the intestine adhere to the mesh), reactions to the mesh, infection, severe and chronic pain, injuries to organs and nerves, and the need for revision surgery.

This is considered to be the main risk with rhinoplasty and it accounts for 5 - 15 % of the cases that cause revision surgery as based on studies.