Sentences with phrase «of reward»

It willed the Good for the sake of reward, out of fear of punishment, or as a form of self - assertion.

If a person needs a threat or promise of reward to be good, they aren't a good person at all.

The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings on the planet are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the religion of:

Every threat that is cast about finding out the truth after we've died only makes us that much more solidified that the choices we make are the right ones, life is to be lived in the hear and now, not squandered on the hopes of reward after death.

We do not fear your made up places of reward and punishment because they do not exist.

Q. 1 The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings on the planet are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the religion of:

Even Edward Gibbon admitted this in his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — «I will dare to affirm,» he wrote, «that allwere prompted by the spirit of enthusiasm, the belief of merit, the hope of reward, and the assurance of divine aid.»

It can be mentioned only at the end, and even then in some ways it should only be whispered, lest it be regarded as a kind of reward for those who shoulder the cross.

Yet it did arise, and when this happened, the Hebrew knew that he must serve God even at personal cost and apart from expectation of reward.

Again, real morality is what is done when no one is watching, regardless of reward.

If your morality comes from fear of reprisal or promise of reward, it is false.

Heck, virtually every Christian I know, yourself included, believes the most childish of things that they would never contemplate swallowing in their day to day activities — dead men rising, mind reading sky gods, life after death, being under constant supervision for the purposes of reward or punishment in some magic postmortem kingdoms — heaven, hell, purgatory, limbo etc...

The theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives, by an immortal, magic, invisible being in the sky for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» is widely believed by:

The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings on the planet are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in an «afterlife» comes from the field of:

It «s a form of self made religion with its own system of reward and punishment, checks and balances but it is not Jesus, the way the truth and the life.

The promise of reward usually clouds the mark's better judgment just enough for them to suppress questioning the incredible claims that the conman is making.

By this person's statement it makes me think of them choosing the oppisite of what Moses chose as we see in Hebrews 11:24 - 26 By faith Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter; 25Choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season; 26Esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures in Egypt: for he had respect unto the recompence of the reward.

We are opened to the possibility of reward or loss; joy or sorrow; glory or shame.

Surely you see that it is more admirable to do good with no expectation of reward.

, and therefore without expectation of a reward.

I do not need promise of reward or punishment to treat human beings with love, kindness, or compassion.

I would hope that an emotionally mature adult doesn't cite fear and / or hope of reward as their primary motivation for socially positive behaviour.

He does not will the Good for the sake of reward, for then he would have become obvious in his aspiration or in his despair.

For in essence, this is the same as to will the Good for the sake of the reward, to the extent that avoiding an evil is an advantage of the same sort as that of attaining a benefit.

Of the four ideas mentioned, his teaching touches most closely on the third, and there it cuts against any simple views of reward and punishment based on divinely given rules.

Furthermore, it's hard to believe such obedience is anything but the product of coercion given it is flanked on one side by a promise of reward and on the other by a threat of punishment.

Yes, this double - minded man becomes as unsteady in all his ways as the one who willed the Good for the sake of the reward, because he is continually intent upon what is in flux, upon what is always changing, and he fears continually that which no man should fear.

If you attached meaning to something the reward is knowledge that you sacrifice will go unrewarded for yourself but carry meaning for those able to understand that what you did was without expectation of reward.

Suppose a man wills the Good simply in order that he may score the victory, then he wills the Good for the sake of the reward, and his double - mindedness is obvious, as the previous section of the talk has sought to point out.

He does not will the Good for the sake of the reward.

I would further add that, similar to the self - preservation concerns of the dutiful Nazi executioners, the apologetics defending such atrocities is subject to a similar coercive context in that the choice of obedience or empathy is flanked by promises of reward and threats of punishment.

For if that were so, His commandments, the missions of the apostles, the scriptures, and the promise of reward and punishment would all be null and void, impossible to reconcile with the Almighty's Wisdom and Justice.

The reason we feel this way relates back to this same belief that we deserve good fortune, and perhaps also to our childhood experiences of reward and punishment, and to ideas about God doling out good and bad fortune alike.

Anyone who looks on the loss of salvation for others as the condition, as it were, on which he serves Christ will in the end only be able to turn away grumbling, because that kind of reward is contrary to the loving - kindness of God.

We do good because we love our fellow man, not because of some promise of reward or punishment.

It is not the external observance to the law that will be the determinant of the reward, for if it were so, love, grace and faith would not be necessary; we could as well be handsomely rewarded by being a Pharisee.

This means that you will sometimes pray without words, and do good in the absence of reward.

Most Christians do the «good» they do because we are taught to try to live «Christ - like» lives in the temporal world — with or without any «guarantee» of reward.

atheism tells us to do good for the sake of doing good - not because of the reward of heaven or the threat of hell.

Craig that was exactly my understanding however if we believe that in that traditional sense a person could lose there eternal life by there actions by not walking in the Lord which i do nt think is right as eternal life is a free gift from God not based on works.Jeremys definition is that we are saved by faith in Jesus Christ to eternal life.I believe the term salvation has the meaning to be saved not necesarily to eternal life but saved from ourselves Christ gives us the power to be transformed into his likeness or to be Christ like.In the eternal picture our actions determine how we are rewarded from God although its not the motivation of the reward but because we love the Lord.regards brent

Of course the paradigm of heaven and hell is all about seeking some sort of reward in a so called afterlife.

Please, any Christian, honestly answer the following: The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the field of: (a) Astronomy; (b) Medicine; (c) Economics; or (d) Christianity You are about 70 % likely to believe the entire Universe began less than 10,000 years ago with only one man, one woman and a talking snake if you are a: (a) historian; (b) geologist; (c) NASA astronomer; or (d) Christian I have convinced myself that gay $ ex is a choice and not genetic, but then have no explanation as to why only gay people have ho.mo $ exual urges.

No, there is no evidence of any reward.

In our brains, dopamine levels increase when we're experiencing or anticipating some kind of reward (it also has many other purposes — read more about it here).

People who need fear of punishment and hope of reward to do the right thing are not good people — they are cowards.

This deserves some kind of reward!

What a Christian buys is servitude in this life, at the cost of his liberty (and often property), to people who claim to be authorized agents of God, on hope of reward that can not be verified until they are dead.

His point is that he thinks it is completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings on the planet are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife».

Paytronix Systems, Inc., a leading provider of reward program solutions to restaurants and retailers, today announced a new «Reward Yourself» capability in its branded mobile app that lets C - store program members redeem rewards of their own choosing.

Construction methods include equal weighting, two versions of minimum volatility, three versions of mean - variance optimization, eight versions of reward - to - risk timing (six of which involve factor models) and a characteristic - based scheme that each year estimates stock weights based on market capitalization, book - to - market ratio, gross profitability, investment, short - term reversal and momentum.