Sentences with phrase «of rich nations»

How is this even happening here, one of the richest nations in the world?

A persistent complaint about the climate change negotiation process is that it favors a handful of rich nations.

But if the point of the fund is to demonstrate the commitment of rich nations to help the poor, it will need them to make real financial commitments.

It is a failure of our educational system that in one of the richest nations on earth that 41 % of us have no more than $ 500 saved for emergencies.

The locus of economic decision - making has been transferred from national governments to transnational corporations of the rich nations of North America, Europe and Far East Asia, backed by the authority of a new World Trade Organization (WTO).

Global climate talks received a symbolic boost today, as the G7 group of rich nations threw their weight behind a long - term goal of decarbonising the global economy over the course of this century.

This is equivalent to 1.8 gHa / person, less than 30 per cent of the average per capita consumption of the rich nations.

At first, much of the income this productive capacity generated was distributed fairly equitably across the populations of rich nations, so that it manifested itself in high levels of disposable income and high consumption levels.

In 1970 the U. N. suggested that 7 % of 1 % of the total GNP of rich nations should be made available for the development assistance.

The hypocritical practices of the rich nations have led to a backlash that has ended the series of trade agreements that progressively broke down national boundaries, especially in the south.

Offering an open auction would likely result in a handful of rich nations always winning, which goes contrary to this idea.

If the IAEA can not provide the leadership it is supposed to, then the governments of the rich nations must get together and help to make sure that the former Soviet Union's nuclear reac - tors can not leak nuclear materials abroad.

The supply of food in impoverished nations is determined not only by global food prices, but also local political instability, natural disasters, the generosity of rich nations, and investment in agricultural development projects.

Indeed, some people argue that it may even make it worse, by including the carbon sinks of the rich nations (the Annex 1 states) only, and not allowing rainforests to benefit for carbon trading.

We are [one of the richest nations] in the world, yet we have not ensured that all students, regardless of ZIP code, have the well - staffed and well - resourced schools they need.

So the current US government is rejecting both emission reductions by rich industrialized nations and adaptation assistance to poor developing nations that will experience the worst consequences of the rich nations» emissions, and is blocking international consensus.

At a news conference on Tuesday, Yu Qingtai, China's special representative on climate change, said China stood with poorer developing countries insisting that the financial obligation of rich nations to compensate poor ones fully for the costs attending climate change was enshrined in the original 1992 framework treaty.

He envisioned a world where all people are able to live a fully dignified life, with clean air to breathe and clean water to drink — and where poor countries were not left with the repercussions of rich nation's dirty ways.

Although the new government in India has not undermined the efforts to deal with the problem, the remark has certainly indicated hardening of stand by India as far as role of rich nations is concerned towards their «bigger» responsibility to not only cut down emissions but also help out poor nations in taking various mitigation and adaptation measures.

To illustrate the injustice of rich nations telling poor ones to control their carbon emissions, the college kids are going to spray - paint CO2 = Life across it, Hahahahaha.

The poor track record of rich nations in meeting their fast start finance pledges has raised serious concerns that these countries will also renege on their bigger promise to ensure that US$ 100 billion flows to developing nations each year by 2020 to help them to respond to climate change.

Literally nobody has ever argued that cutting the average income of rich nations would automatically produce better social outcomes.

Ravallion questions a central tenet of de-growth theory, namely, that the ecology - busting levels of income and consumption characteristic of rich nations are not necessary in order to maintain their strong social outcomes.

I think your strongest rebuttal of these panaceas was the fact that poverty is the most pressing problem, and none of the rich nations are lining up to help combat that, in the most obvious way.

The theory of climate justice tells us that the gap between rich and poor and the looming threat of catastrophic climate change are not simply unfortunate circumstances that demand our attention and action, but rather the result of active efforts on the part of rich nations, wealthy elites, and powerful corporations to profit on the backs of the global poor and the environment.

The United States is one of the richest nations on Earth, much richer per capita than any other large one.

By 2015 the nations of Asia, led by China and India, will surpass even the unrestrained emissions of the richer nations.

The G7 group of rich nations have thrown their weight behind a long - term goal of decarbonising the global economy over the course of this century

These are just two instances of our collective history — there is also the epidemic of missing and murdered indigenous women, there are treaty violations, there are pipeline plans, there are deplorable living conditions on reserves who lack even running water in one of the richest nations in the world, there is a lack of equal funding for indigenous children compared to non-indigenous children for schooling, entrenched racism, and on and on we go.

Total greenhouse gas emissions by China and other emerging nations since 1850 will surpass those of rich nations this decade, complicating U.N.

Faced with this limit, each of these rich nations would be forced to rapidly reduce its emissions (see figure).

This is particularly so, they argue, since the developing countries» emissions are expected to surpass those of the rich nations in 20 or 30 years.

You can't have defined protections for people in some of the richest nations on Earth and leave others with a watered - down version.

The very fact that two of the richest nations on Earth — the US and the UK — may well have had pivotal democratic events gamed by a third - party app on Facebook only shows how dangerous data has become in the wrong hands.