Sentences with phrase «of right and wrong about»

Really young kids don't have a sense of right and wrong about this issue yet; their brains haven't developed enough to think outside of themselves and about others.

Not exact matches

This is not about making judgments of what is «right» and what is «wrong.»

If you are worried about an employee taking a lot of sick time, there's a right and wrong way to ask about it.

Adweek applauded Duracell's «Island Without Power» ad talking about Puerto Rico's struggles in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria, saying,» «Island Without Power» is an example of a brand doing activism right in the wake of political upheaval and natural disaster in a year when many brands got it very wrong.»

The more I learned about the real Marcia Clark, not the two dimensional cardboard cutout I saw in the news, but the complicated, whip - smart giant - hearted mother of two, who woke up every day, put both feet on the floor and dedicated herself to righting an unconciscable wrong, the loss of two innocents Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown, the more I had to recognize that I, along with the rest of the world, had been superficial and careless in my judgment, and I'm here today to tell you I'm sorry,» Paulson said to Clark while onstage.

While there is no right or wrong when it comes to content creation and sharing, I'd say that a loose guideline may be helpful as a way to think about the various uses of social networks.

Sometimes I get it really right and sometimes I got it really wrong, but I always have a deeper understanding of the topic when I've finished writing about it.

Canadians need to be asking what will happen to their increasingly petro - dependent economy if the rest of the world is right about climate change and their Prime Minister is wrong.

The purpose of these conversations was to explore what, if anything, is unique and measurable about the governance of family firms, and to understand what the BSCI gets right and wrong.

Additionally, investing legend Howard Marks published a widely - read memo on Wednesday that warned on a variety of market conditions right now, including positioning around the FAANG stocks and a lack of ideas about what could go wrong in markets.

I agree with this: «It is about whether or not the prominent preachers and theologians of our day consider the possibility that they might be wrong or only partially right and that there's still a lot to learn.»

It is about whether or not the prominent preachers and theologians of our day consider the possibility that they might be wrong or only partially right and that there's still a lot to learn.

the bible is a record of things that are wrong and not condoned by God as well as proscriptions about the right thing to do.

*********************************** One would hope that voters were casting their ballots on the basis of what they conclude is best for a civil society and a pluralistic population, not on the more egocentric opinions they may have about right or wrong that are derived from their religious beliefs.

> Its not a battle of whos right and whos wrong, its about what people believe and hold to be the honest truth.

The movie served to give me a different platform to discuss faith from, not to argue that my belief system is right and someone else's is wrong, but instead to point out that the world is hungry for questions about the soul and what we don't see right in front of us.

(8) But since God can not bring it about that P go right with respect to A if P is significantly free with respect to A, if God knows that P will go wrong with respect to A if actualized and made free with respect to A, then God can not actualize a world in which P is made free with respect to A and performs the right action although this latter state of affairs is itself consistent (possible).

No, this was about behavior:... people showing indifference to right and wrong... people with a twisted moral code... people with a complete absence of self - restraint

They show me first why they embarrass me: because I am committed to a pretense of detached scholarship and existential ambiguity that excuses me from the vigorous demands of wisdom, which is all about deciding what is right and what is wrong.

The lyrics of one song, «Brown Mountain Lights,» struck me as especially beautiful, and something to which you might relate, especially in light of your response to «They Were Right (And Wrong) About the Slippery Slope.&raqand something to which you might relate, especially in light of your response to «They Were Right (And Wrong) About the Slippery Slope.&raqAnd Wrong) About the Slippery Slope.»

You do realize that someone of a different faith could say the exact same thing about someone involved in their religion, but you would say they were wrong and you were right.

It says in 1john 3:8 whoever sins belongs to the devil and Jesus came to destroy the works of the devil which was sin.Think about this, right or wrong things is not sin, sin is a nature that you were born with, but when you confessed your sins he forgave you, and you became a new creature, old things have passed away and now you are a new person; and a new person is not the same, if you can still sin after being born again then what did he take away, don't you know that his blood is so powerful that you don't have to worry about sinning because it has been destroyed, he took it away.

Our difficulty in speaking about cross-cultural principles of right and wrong is compounded by the fact that international organizations, from the United Nations to the World Court, are fragile and nearly helpless in many of the most critical areas of conflict.

I guess sometimes it's humbling to sit and think about how many people believe in every different religion no matter how different they are and then science and accepting the fact that a HUGE majority of people are going to be right or wrong when they die and some people spending their entire life trying to justify or prove something that may be wrong.

And to all: Whatever you think about the rights and wrongs of judicial execution — Catholics, clearly, differ about it — you ought at least lament its necessity if you wrongly think it necessaAnd to all: Whatever you think about the rights and wrongs of judicial execution — Catholics, clearly, differ about it — you ought at least lament its necessity if you wrongly think it necessaand wrongs of judicial execution — Catholics, clearly, differ about it — you ought at least lament its necessity if you wrongly think it necessary.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

Greene spoke about the power of observation and how it often determines what we believe to be right and wrong.

a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized religions are no more than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)

In short, and not surprisingly, the World's most gifted evolutionary biologists, astronomers, cosmologists, geologists, archeologists, paleontologists, historians, modern medical researchers and linguists (and about 2,000 years of accu.mulated knowledge) are right and a handful of Iron Age Middle Eastern goat herders were wrong.

If being intelligent and compassionate makes Obama a «wrong» kind of Christian, what does that tell you about the «right» kind?

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

Having an academic discussion about religious views and theological beliefs is fine enough, but there is certainly no reason to go into a discussion of who is right an wrong because frankly, you do not know.

For the great majority of Americans, moral discourse — beliefs about right and wrong, good and evil — is shaped and carried by the biblical tradition.

Click here to hear a debate between transgender woman, Jenny - Anne Bishop, and former transgender Walt Heyer about the rights and wrongs of gender - change surgery and how Christians should respond on Premier Christian Radio's Unbelievable program

Muneef, when you say «Deuteronomy 4:39 (Wrong) since it states that Jesus and God are one, but Right if was saying God is one and no other...», you do realize that Deuteronomy was written centuries before the birth of Jesus and says nothing about him.

If we do not exercise care, reasonable discourse about right and wrong can easily be swamped by the language of intentionality.

If he is right about the day, but wrong that he is one of the ones «going» and I don't go either, then I could end up owing him a million dollars...

Now this Law or Rule about Right and Wrong used to be called the Law of Nature.

And there would be no sense in trying to do that unless you and he had some sort of agreement as to what Right and Wrong are; just as there would be no sense in saying that a footballer had committed a foul unless there was some agreement about the rules of footbaAnd there would be no sense in trying to do that unless you and he had some sort of agreement as to what Right and Wrong are; just as there would be no sense in saying that a footballer had committed a foul unless there was some agreement about the rules of footbaand he had some sort of agreement as to what Right and Wrong are; just as there would be no sense in saying that a footballer had committed a foul unless there was some agreement about the rules of footbaand Wrong are; just as there would be no sense in saying that a footballer had committed a foul unless there was some agreement about the rules of football.

I believe Wright is wrong with his «New Perspective on Paul» idea, but I think he is right on target with this essay and helped confirm some of what I have been thinking about a new (or old) approach to reading the Bible.

People refusing medical treatment because they think they can pray disease away, The demoralizing way religion makes you feel about yourself (I am a wretch, a sinner, a bad person by nature), the religious wars that have been fought for millenia, the self righteous passing laws based on THEIR beliefs (change to the pledge of allegience which now excludes anyone who does not believe in a fairy godfather, the change to the national motto that turned it into the lie «in god we trust», the bigotry that «my religion is the right one and you are wrong so I'll pray for you» kind of crap... don't you realize that it is insulting to me when someone says they will pray for me... its the same as saying I'm going to do something for you but there won't be any effect, so it is just a waste of time.

Of course God doesn't want that for us, so He also warns us and tells us the truth about right and wrong.

As Stephen Carter has written, it isn't simply a matter of understanding right from wrong and learning what the rules are; every employee also has to learn the «rules about following the rules.»

It's about your relationship with the one who died on the cross — and if you have a relationship with Him, as it says in the Bible, the Holy Spirit will convict you of what is right and wrong — but in order to have the Holy Spirit, you must seek the only one who is worth seeking.

(When you think about it that way it may not seem so surprising that such a search should lead to the Golden Rule and universal principles of right and wrong applying to everyone, like the Commandments — though the steps involved in getting to these results are by no means trivial.)

blah, blah, blah... waste your money on billboards, debate about what's real or myth, and who's right or wrong... i'm STILL a child of God... you can't shake my faith... all that matters to me is that I believe and trust in Him...

As to your claim about the keys being used to determine moral right and wrong, I don't see that anywhere in Matthew 16 or Isaiah 22, and although the Jewish people may have understood this as referring to such judgments, they understood then (and even today) that moral judgments are made by God alone and through a proper understanding of what God has said in Scripture.

I've lots of thoughts about whether the wars were worth it, what went right and wrong,....

Many Christians see Cod as the guardian of the moral law, but some thinkers recognize the autonomy of morals and hold that people can discern what is right and wrong independently of their basic beliefs about the universe.

In short, and not surprisingly, the World's most gifted evolutionary biologists, astronomers, cosmologists, geologists, archeologists, paleontologists, historians, modern medical researchers and linguists (and about 2,000 years of acc.umulated knowledge) are right and a handful of Iron Age Middle Eastern goat herders were wrong.