I also know that due to the statistics, homosexual relationships (and in fact, heterosexual relationships outside
of sacramental marriage) are rarely committed.
Malick's film aspires to an elevated and mature look at nuptial vows, love, faithfulness, and infidelity within the context
of sacramental marriage.
Hence he can, for example, be of the opinion that the Church could give up the indissolubility
of sacramental marriage just as well as the ecclesial form of contracting a marriage, or that she could change the very principles of sexual morality because formerly she took a different authoritative, though not definitive, view of their application, which will perhaps have to be revised.
In reality, only the death of a spouse dissolves the bond
of a sacramental marriage.
«It's provisional, and because of this the great majority
of our sacramental marriages are null.
Against such an ancient and affirming tradition, Francis's assertion that «the great majority
of our sacramental marriages are null» shocked both common sense and Catholic sensibility.
Not exact matches
So Protestants in their way degraded
marriage by depriving it
of sacramental status as a manifestation
of the divine personal logos in this world.
So Protestants in their ways degraded
marriage by depriving it
of sacramental status as a manifestation
of the divine personal logos in the world.
But in so far as attitudes among younger Catholics about Catholic
sacramental marriages fit into the swath
of millennials views, Pope Francis comments miss a lot
of nuance.
The shift in our understanding
of sex from a
sacramental and life - changing encounter to the thing you do with your friends when you're bored has made all
of our relationships shallower and made each
of us less capable
of the profound gift
of self on which
marriage is founded.
This
sacramental vision seems to capture something most
of us intuitively feel about
marriage but have trouble articulating.
Pope St. John Paul II's Familiaris Consortio, for example, communicates an interpretation
of the Bible and tradition with respect to the issue
of marriage and
sacramental discipline in the contemporary Catholic Church: Divorced and remarried persons may not receive Communion (Familiaris Consortio § 84).
The Catechism
of the Catholic Church states: «Divorce does injury to the covenant
of salvation,
of which
sacramental marriage is the sign.
«Were we to separate legal and
sacramental marriage, it would solve all sorts
of problems, not the least
of which is the growing discomfort that many
of us have that legal
marriage is available only to some responsible adults who are in monogamous relationships.»
The relevant loci are the creation story, the Sixth Commandment, Ephesians 5 with its meditation on
marriage as a
sacramental sign
of the union
of Christ and his Church, the end
of Revelation with its depiction
of the
marriage of the Lamb, and the whole narrative stream
of Holy Scripture that assumes the heterosexual monogamous norm, despite the fact
of royal and patriarchal polygamy.
It does not share the fundamental Catholic convictions about
sacramental marriage: an exclusive, lifelong union
of man and woman that is open to new life, a faithful and unbreakable bond mirroring God's love for humanity and, specifically, Christ's love for the Church.
By the seventeenth century, however, the Anglican divines had begun to develop a theology
of marriage to replace the
sacramental model
of marriage that the Thirty - Nine Articles clearly denied.
Of course, it is never fair to criticize an author for the book that he did not write, but the omission of a contemporary presentation of the sacramental model accounts in my judgment for the somewhat skewed presentation that Witte gives of the Catholic theology of marriag
Of course, it is never fair to criticize an author for the book that he did not write, but the omission
of a contemporary presentation of the sacramental model accounts in my judgment for the somewhat skewed presentation that Witte gives of the Catholic theology of marriag
of a contemporary presentation
of the sacramental model accounts in my judgment for the somewhat skewed presentation that Witte gives of the Catholic theology of marriag
of the
sacramental model accounts in my judgment for the somewhat skewed presentation that Witte gives
of the Catholic theology of marriag
of the Catholic theology
of marriag
of marriage.
It's not for someone looking for a casual read, but I've found it to be one
of the most enlightening and convincing takes on how
marriage becomes
sacramental through the expression
of erotic love over time.
He concludes that, since «sexual union is not part
of the essence
of marriage, as the Catechism
of the Council
of Trent and Vatican II teach, consequently, the exercise
of the sexual act between divorced and [civilly] remarried couples does not harm the existing
sacramental bond.»
To give an example: The Church may change and adapt to modern life certain principles
of her human law according to which a Catholic must marry; but only a person
of little theological knowledge would draw the conclusion that the Church could ever abolish the indissolubility
of the
sacramental consummated
marriage if only there were enough protests.
I think we uniquely offer the
marriage of the heart and head in worship, a unique liturgy and approach to scripture, and a
sacramental worldview that implicitly cares for creation.
The Church can certainly not give up the principle
of the indissolubility
of a consummated
sacramental marriage, because she is bound by the words
of Christ in the gospel, even, despite a single contrary intervention at the Council, in the case
of an innocent party.
Sacramental or covenantal love was central to
marriage, but mutual helpfulness (the economic aspect
of marriage), children, sexual exchange and the values
of kinship were emphasized as well.
In 1999, we are no longer reduced to «guessing» whether he was inspired or speaking only as a man: • adultery has lost its moral significance and become commonplace; • chastity has become a symbol
of unhealthy development; • contraception in expectation
of fornication is taught to children in the schools; • respect between the sexes has been replaced by mutual exploitation and / or competition; •
marriage has lost its
sacramental nature and its enduring promise; • statistically, divorce is common, teenage pregnancy is widespread, single parent and serially parented families increase, sexual disease is epidemic, intercourse is recreational, abortion is ubiquitous.
This is the insight (perhaps often unconsciously known) that is behind the common Christian understanding
of marriage as in some real sense
sacramental.
Among other significant ways that preliberal Christianity contributed to an expansion
of human choice was to transform the idea
of marriage from an institution based upon considerations
of family and property to one based upon the choice and consent
of individuals united in
sacramental love.
Here in this relationship is a truly
sacramental appreciation
of marriage.
While natural law and Augustine's moral theology might be difficult for some, the rules derived from them were understood by ordinary Catholics: Sexual intimacy is permissible only in a
sacramental marriage between one man and one woman, and the purpose
of marriage is the procreation and education
of children.
-LSB-...]
Marriage, the sacramental sign of marriage, brings about immediately between the spouses a bond that no longer depends upon their wills because now it is a gift God has given to them
Marriage, the
sacramental sign
of marriage, brings about immediately between the spouses a bond that no longer depends upon their wills because now it is a gift God has given to them
marriage, brings about immediately between the spouses a bond that no longer depends upon their wills because now it is a gift God has given to them.»
«Does Tony's admittance on the Internet that he is diagnosed / certified with NPD (formerly called megalomania) give Tony more need for accountability and / or should we then extend Tony more grace for creating the non-biblical doctrine
of «
Sacramental Marriage» (also called «church sanctioned pre-marital sex» by those that disagree....)?»
When
marriage is said to give graces to fight against lust it emerges in its
sacramental nobility, for lust is always an enemy
of love.
Within this mystery
of redemption, as the Pope sees it, the
sacramental graces
of marriage, sustaining conjugal chastity, have a special effect in achieving the redemption
of the body through the overcoming
of concupiscence.
Once again he showed clear reserve regarding the concept
of marriage as a remedy for concupiscence, and insisted rather that the
sacramental grace
of marriage enables the spouses to dominate concupiscence and purify it
of its dominant self - seeking.
The least that can be said from a reading
of this passage is that John Paul II, while not explicitly rejecting the concept
of remedium concupiscentiae, suggests that «traditional theological language» on the matter has remained one - sided precisely because
of a failure to weigh the
sacramental implications
of marriage.
The goods
of marriage, he says, include the bearing and raising
of children in the love
of the Lord; the family loyalties
of husband and wife, parents and children; and the
sacramental unity
of marriage.
But his message for married people is that it should be attempted; their mutual love should see its need: and the
sacramental graces
of their
marriage along with their personal prayer are the powerful means they have to achieve it.
She quotes from the teachings
of the Catholic Church, such as Gaudium et Spes, on a whole range
of issues from the
sacramental nature
of marriage to theimportance
of the being open to new life.
The solution is a return to the pre-Constantinian practice
of the Church in which a Church
marriage is a purely
sacramental matter, subject to the doctrine and disciplines
of the Church, but without legal standing.
Solemn and penitential in nature, it was explicitly a concession to human frailty and lacked the signs associated with
sacramental marriage (in the eastern Churches, the Crowning, the singing
of certain prayers, and the sharing
of the Eucharist).
Here he draws out how
marriage can be a «yes» to the healing
of concupiscence without the latter being an intrinsic «end»
of the
sacramental union.
What an anulment says is that the
sacramental nature
of the
marriage never happened.
In order to create an atmosphere
of flexibility and welcome, he speaks
of marriage as an «ideal» rather than a
sacramental reality.
Missing from this, or perhaps purposely excised, is the Christian understanding
of marriage as an institution established by God, a
sacramental reality in the Church, ordered to the happiness and spiritual growth
of the spouses and to the procreation
of children for the good
of society.
This is why
marriage needs to be lived within the community
of grace as a
sacramental order
of the Church.
Marriage as a Sacrament The sacramental character of marriage is expressed most clearly in St Paul's letter to the Ep
Marriage as a Sacrament The
sacramental character
of marriage is expressed most clearly in St Paul's letter to the Ep
marriage is expressed most clearly in St Paul's letter to the Ephesians:
Furthermore, the sacrament
of marriage itself should hold a high place in the life
of the Church since it is the
sacramental expression
of the relationship between Christ and the Church with a view to the birth
of further sons and daughters for the Kingdom
of Christ.
Like Jones makes clear in his
marriage manifesto: it's so much easier to get into a
sacramental marriage than to get out
of a legal one.