Less than half of adults (42 %) say performance on standardized tests is a highly important
indicator of school quality — that includes just 13 % who call test scores extremely important.
In particular, it could lower
perceptions of school quality in states where many students perform poorly relative to national norms but are deemed proficient by the state.
This paper presents basic evidence about the impact
of school quality on individual earnings and on economic growth.
This helps us provide a more in - depth
picture of school quality nationwide and allows us to improve our school profiles and ratings.
Figure 2 presents the strength of the relationship between citizen
ratings of school quality and each of these school characteristics after taking into account the other key variables built into our analysis.
This paper aims to clarify the underlying basis for the observed differences in the
consumption of school quality associated with race, education, and income.
For reasons probably due to the home environment, more of the variation in student reading performance is
independent of school quality than is the case in math performance.
Is it possible to build accountability tests that both supply accurate
evidence of school quality and promote instructional improvement?
The authors see progress in establishing more meaningful measures
of school quality despite the difficulty of comparing school quality across states.
Schools are required to show at least one measurable
example of school quality that allows for meaningful differentiation of school performance.
We believe that some of these differences are critical because the choices states make may determine how powerful attendance and chronic absence are as
measures of school quality and student success.
When educators, parents and community members have a complete
picture of school quality, they are empowered to make decisions that are best for students, teachers and families.
The national sample allows us to examine the degree to which citizen
ratings of school quality are responsive to performance levels relative to the nation or simply to differences in performance within specific states.
Paul Curtis is
director of school quality for New Tech Network, a national organization that works with communities to develop innovative public high schools.
As this report from FutureEd shows, thirty - six states and the District of Columbia have adopted measuring attendance as
part of their school quality indicator for their state accountability rubric.
Paul Peterson interviews Robert Shapiro, an expert on public opinion, about how the partisan divide in education policy is shifting, as
issues of school quality and accountability have produced «conflicted liberals,» at the same time that the presidential election is creating «conflicted conservatives.»
The Virginia Board of Education is revising its accreditation standards to provide a more comprehensive
view of school quality while encouraging continuous improvement for all schools and placing increased emphasis on closing achievement gaps.
What evolved was a measurement framework that based its
assessment of school quality on students» performance on only a single assessment (an invalid standard for measuring student progress) and mandated a series of wide - ranging sanctions that did not prove to significantly improve student or school performance.
Loud protests and initiatives, big and small, have created cracks in the standardized testing movement, resulting in the passage of the federal Every Student Succeeds Act, which now requires multiple indicators for making
determinations of school quality and student progress.
«Attending Dr. Hattie's professional development workshop, on their own time before school resumes in September, tells you how much our educators value the opportunity to learn, grow and evolve,» commented Larry Thomas, Executive Director
of School Quality at Oakland Schools.
Inspectors combine hard metrics, such as test scores, with softer ones, such as observations of classroom teaching, in order to arrive at an overall
judgment of school quality.
This new report from the Education Commission of the States explores what «shifts are being made, and how are states incorporating a wider
variety of school quality measurements,» provides «a national overview of current state accountability systems,» and «looks at the changes states are making in their ESSA plans.»
Furthermore, by building off the current system and using a small number of broad summative classifications, this particular approach addresses many of the critiques offered against other
types of school quality ratings that compare every school against one another or give every school a single number like California's old Academic Performance Index (API) system.
The GreatSchools Summary Rating appears at the top of a school's profile and provides an overall
snapshot of school quality based on how well a school prepares all its students for postsecondary success — be it college or career.
There are two possible explanations for that, according to Anne Herr, director
of school quality for FOCUS DC, a charter advocacy organization.
ESSA calls for states to include at least one non-academic indicator
of school quality in their accountability plans for each level of schools (elementary, middle, and high schools).
In this study I explore this question using data from the Charlotte - Mecklenburg (North Carolina) school district (CMS) to measure the
impact of school quality on arrest and incarceration rates.
Additionally, TCTA expressed dismay that the draft plan did not take advantage of ESSA's
addition of school quality or student success measures for states to use in their state accountability systems to supplement state standardized test results.
I test the validity of the inspection ratings by examining to what extent these ratings can forecast measures
of school quality not observed by the inspectors, after taking into account the measures they do observe.
Phrases with «of school quality»