Sentences with phrase «of scientific law»

A little judicious observation as well as knowledge of scientific law will convince any one of this fact.

That is because the necessity of the scientific law is inconsistent with the freedom of the free agent's choice.

The way the past persists into the present is the essence of efficient causation, and observes the regularity of scientific law.

Then I ask them how they are so possesive of the «truth» of scientific law, when the solar system we live in breaks a few of them.

Is that what you mean by «law» — just the ordinary notion of scientific law?

A metaphysical principle that would explain the existence of scientific law throughout the universe is a MIND which controls and directs matter; matter can not control and direct itself «upward».

A metaphysical principle that would explain the existence of scientific law throughout the universe is that MIND controls and directs matter; matter can not control and direct itself «upward».

Do blue - green algae or bacteria have free will, or is their behavior automatic and within the realm of scientific law?

You can have faith in science because you've studied science, and repeated the experiments which are the basis of scientific laws.

You're right, Charles, God did indeed create science and all of the scientific laws.

The universe is governed by an amazing system of scientific laws, and humanity is driven by our animal instincts together with our higher mental and social functional areas that have allowed us to survive as a species.

Readers of this magazine will know that it is our contention that the very existence of scientific laws, and the human «genius» in discovering, applying and refining them, are themselves an indication of the relationship between God, the Creator and Environer of the universe, and the material world in its all its correlative dependencies.

Analysis in terms of intentions does not preclude analysis in terms of scientific laws.

It is the lawlikeness of scientific laws that makes them predictive and so allows them to be falsified by appropriate experiments.

It would be foolish to try to reduce art appreciation to a set of scientific laws, of course.

Science is unified; it is not possible to make use of scientific laws in one context, and then deny them in another.

Bending of scientific laws is allowed, but if bent too much, the story becomes fantasy and not science fiction.

Why have that when you can make a convoluted story, bizarre mechanics that surely break some sort of scientific laws, and a character roster that also includes Billy Hatcher sans giant egg?

Not exact matches

«We need major reform of our laws, both internationally and domestically, to make open access the norm and ensure that sharing, promoting scientific progress, and exercising creative expression are not crimes,» says the EFF.

And so, in 1917, while working in the Friends» Ambulance Unit on the Western Front, Richardson decided to experiment with the idea of making a numerical forecast - one based on scientific laws rather than past trends.

At the center of his efforts is a Roosevelt - era law called the Antiquities Act which allows presidents to designate «objects of historic or scientific interest» as National Monuments.

While other firms play catchup with a reactive approach, Hagens Berman has become a proactive pioneer — testing vehicles, effecting scientific evidence of new fraud and leading the pack against automakers who violate the law.

Newton invented calculus and was most famous for his laws of Newtonian physics which dominated scientific thinking for nearly 200 years about force, motion and mass.

(of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature.

As with politics, those that are entrenched in the belief in a God will not be persuaded by any scientific findings; they can always say that God was behind the creation of those physical laws or principles, chemical reactions, etc..

Definition of «miracle:» A surprising and welcome event that is not explicable by natural or scientific laws and is therefore considered to be the work of a divine agency.»

We now look to logic and particle science and laws of physics to explain — with scientific evidence — what we could not in the past.

That covers most of our Scientific understanding, because it's very difficult to move beyond Theory to Law (which is conclusively demonstrated to be 100 % accurate at all times).

Richard Dawkins merely states in unvarnished form doctrines that other scientific metaphysicians take for granted: In the beginning were the particles and the impersonal laws of physics; life evolved by a mindless, non-teleological process in which God played no part; and human beings are just another animal species.

Hawking, arguably the greatest scientific mind of our time, said he believes the laws of physics and not the hand of a god explain why we are here.

Christians have voted to put their God's name on everyones money, add «Under God» to the flag salute, force schools to teach intelligent design with absolutely no scientific basis along side the sciences, voted to write their moral laws on the fronts of public courthouses and tax funded buildings, voted to ban certain people from living together, being intimate or raising children because their orientation didn't fit with their bible beliefs.

«Miracle: A surprising and welcome event that is not explicable by natural or scientific laws and is therefore considered to be the work of a divine agency.»

-------------- I never said that the Law of Causality was scientific.

It is our duty as Americans to know and appreciate the systems of belief — the mythic cosmologies, the scientific laws, the common - sense attitudes — that in times past have served to give coherence and purpose to our life together.

Nature, for the great 17th - century scientific pioneers was God's Book, inscribed with holy laws every bit as valid as the laws of the other book, Holy Scripture.

An extraneous cause that can not be grasped in terms of the laws governing mass and energy appears to abide outside the realm of legitimate scientific reference.

With few exceptions, we have not seen men of the cloth actively applying the scientific method and revealing new laws of nature that add to our appreciation of the created world.

It is part of the standard scientific worldview that the laws of science are universally valid.

So a non-believer says that the story of the ark can not have happened because it violated scientific law.

You ignore scientific concepts like cause and effect, and you don't realize that a closed system can be defined however the observer wants, so you throw out technological phrases to try to ignore the implications of thermodynamics by saying the laws of physics are not set in stone.

Taking the Darwinian revolution into the law, Holmes rejected the antebellum idea of natural justice in favor of a supposedly scientific legal positivism that identified law only with power.

To deny the veracity of the Theory of Evolution and its 5 laws is to deny the validity of the scientific method itself.

There is little in Buddhism to encourage people to devote their lives to scientific experiment or to seeking the laws of nature.

As Montgomery puts it: «Science and theology form and test their respective theories in the same way; the scientific theorizer attempts objectively to formulate conceptual Gestalts (hypotheses, theories, laws) capable of rendering Nature intelligible, and the theologian endeavors to provide conceptual Gestalts (doctrines, dogmas) which will «fit the facts» and properly reflect the norms of Holy Scripture.»

You do understand that EVERY scientific theory and equation has been modified and will continue to be modified, e.g. Newton's laws of motion were wrong — they worked ok at low speeds, but were nontheless wrong: they have since been modified.

So, «scientifically»... no, I'm not aware of any studies that would suggest that the actual «paid» acts would somehow cause harm therefore, creating a «scientific justification» for said laws against.

It is loaded with information, and the scientific laws of information state that all info comes from a mind.

Scientific laws are descriptions of nature.

The law of independent assortment constitutes the scientific basis for refuting the idea of racial stereotypes.

I am amazed that people can't see the obvious, the bible is not a timeless book of laws from an omniscient being, it is a man made docu ment based on the moral, technological, and scientific state of knowledge millennia ago.