Sentences with phrase «of scientific learning»

This is the true essence of scientific learning.

Particularly when, as both May and Oreskes have accomplished a great deal of scientific learning, their theories about society turn out to be as mad as Icke's, and as poorly thought through as Tatchell's.

The project is modeled on CERN, the Swiss high - energy physics lab formed after World War II to restore Europe's tradition of scientific learning.

It would be unfaithful to both the best in the world of scientific learning and the wisest kind of religious leadership to offer more than these broad clear strokes in the portrayal of what it means in our day to undertake the work of a scientist as a Christian calling.

Not exact matches

«The opportunities for new discoveries in the field of deep learning are very exciting, and the applications are endless,» said Google engineering fellow Geoffrey Hinton, who will serve as Vector's chief scientific advisor, in a statement.

Like Galactic, the project would help carry out important scientific experiments, with the goal of learning to monitor and control active volcanoes.

• Julia Computing, a Berkeley, Calif. - based provider of open - source language for data science, machine learning and scientific computing, raised $ 4.6 million in seed funding.

As the backbone of our society, construction impacts nearly every industry directly or indirectly — whether it's building new labs to foster scientific discoveries, hospitals to tend to our sick or injured, or modern classrooms to learn.

Scientific research indicates that the benefits of reading go far beyond learning particular facts or insights.

Of course, there's lots of useful scientific research out there — and the right data can help us disprove our own biased conceptions and lead to superior learning, with major benefitOf course, there's lots of useful scientific research out there — and the right data can help us disprove our own biased conceptions and lead to superior learning, with major benefitof useful scientific research out there — and the right data can help us disprove our own biased conceptions and lead to superior learning, with major benefits.

Meta — which, in the words of cofounder Sam Molyneux, uses «artificial intelligence to analyze new scientific knowledge as it's published» — partners with academic journals to access many thousands of scientific papers and draw insight from them (beyond the keywords, that is) with the help of a machine learning tool developed by SRI International, which created Apple's spectral personal assistant, Siri.

Inspired by lessons from lean manufacturing, it relies on «validated learning,» rapid scientific experimentation, as well as a number of counter-intuitive practices that shorten product development cycles, measure actual progress without resorting to vanity metrics, and learn what customers really want.

It describes how Exxon conducted cutting - edge climate research decades ago and then, without revealing all that it had learned, worked at the forefront of climate denial, manufacturing doubt about the scientific consensus that its own scientists had confirmed.

I've learned that whether someone is trying to qualify for the Olympics, break ground in mathematical theory, launch a new business, or craft an artistic masterpiece, many of the practices underlying sustainable success are the same; supported by scientific evidence; and available to everyone.

In our research, we incorporated an ensemble of computational methods from machine learning, image processing, and other data - scientific disciplines to extract useful psychological indicators from photographic data.

The primary learning objective is for the intern to develop expertise in the transferability of scientific areas of expertise to plant - based and clean - meat research and an understanding of the scientific market and opportunities in a specific country.

By this he meant that the human brain, along with its senses, and with is learned cultural bias, and even with the extension our scientific instruments gives us, has only made a rough map in our minds of the REAL world (the territory).

There are so many things to learn about God and His desires for us, that getting caught up on the Holy Trinity and explaining it as something scientific can take us away from the glory of His creation.

the monasaries were schools of learning, scientific and religious.

It's possible to learn lots of things over time using scientific endeavors.

In fact, there have been a large number of scientists throughout history who have made major scientific discoveries that have shaped so much of our knowledge, and they worked out of desire to learn the truth about the origin and nature of God's creation.

Over the course of time as we learn more about the world around us scientific explanations have displaced many supernatural explanations.

The American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the Howard Hughes Medical Insti.tute (HHMI) published a joint report, ti.tled Scientific Foundations for Future Physicians in which they call for increased emphasis on evolution as one of the basic sciences students learn before they come to medical school.

«The creation story is taught in science and there is no evidence that pupils learn scientific theories about the origin of the Earth.»

The reason for opposition to scientific accounts of our origins, according to Lewontin, is not that people are ignorant of facts, but that they have not learned to think from the right starting point.

As Galileo learned, when new scientific information is put forward it is not easy to let go of our comfortable paradigms.

I can only shake my head and wonder if any of them actually went to school and learned anything about the terminology of the scientific method?

To attack something when you're too ignorant of the facts (and too lazy to be bothered to learn about the opposing side) to even know what you're attacking only shows how much society has to gain by embracing the scientific method (even if you reject some theories).

The Renascence, the explosion of learning that began the scientific revolution, was essentially a rediscovery of Greek and Roman philosophy and technology.

We continue to learn more and more about these principles and it is difficult not to develop a sort of faith, even reverence in these scientific workings of the universe.

It's only after we're older once we've had notions pounded into our heads that we can't or shouldn't learn from this or that, that we lose our ability to appreciate all of God's creations and see God's hand (poetic term not literal) in all things (or worse, some have been so blinded as to see it in nothing, as they hide behind their cold scientific idols, losing the same wonder that got the scientists there to start with)

This relation of the Christian teaching to life (in contrast with a scientific aloofness from life), or this ethical side of Christianity, is essentially the edifying, and the form in which it is presented, however strict it may be, is altogether different, qualitatively different, from that sort of learning which is «indifferent,» the lofty heroism of which is from a Christian point of view so far from being heroism that from a Christian point of view it is an inhuman sort of curiosity.

Kuhn maintains that every scientific community is dominated by a cluster of very broad conceptual and methodological presuppositions embodied in the «standard examples» through which students learn the prevailing theories of the field.

The present Humanism, whether we call it scientific or existentialist, is only the natural and nal culmination of those principles of autonomy and nominalism in philosophy, which oversowed the New Learning.

This act allowed each state to establish colleges «where the leading object shall be, without excluding other scientific and classical studies, and including military tactics, to teach such branches of learning as are related to agriculture and the mechanic arts.»

And it was also from Comte and the cultural milieu that popularized his philosophy of science, that Ginzberg learned his own views on the character of the scientific culture into which the Jewish people was emerging.

3) Biblical scholarship relating the creation account of Genesis and ancient Near Eastern cosmology continues to become more accessible to the average reader, so Christian university students are in a great position to learn from Bible professors why a literal, scientific reading of Genesis 1 and 2 need not be a fundamental element of the Christian faith.

Much of our scientific mastery of echolocation is learned from bats.

It is a curious fact that while the general culture of contemporary theologians is still markedly literary, rather than scientific, they seem to forget the many lessons concerning the human situation to be learnt from tragedy, whether ancient or modern.

In today's One Verse Podcast, you will see why we can not read Genesis 1:14 - 19 as a scientific explanation of how the sun, moon, and stars came to be, and you will also learn from the text what three purposes these celestial lights serve in God's creation.

Previously, we learned that Moses did not intend to write a scientific explanation of how the sun, moon, and stars came into existence, but instead wanted the Hebrew people to understand how Yahweh was different and better than the gods of Canaan, Egypt, and Babylon, with which the Hebrew people were familiar.

In this episode of the One Verse Podcast, you will see why we can not read Genesis 1:14 - 19 as a scientific explanation of how the sun, moon, and stars came to be, and you will also learn from the text what three purposes these celestial lights serve in God's creation.

Anytime a scientific organization endorses sod, remember Gittings words: They are running scared.Pro - sod activists have learned that intimidation and strategic alliances work, and they are never hesitant about using intimidation and psyc manipulation to reach the goals of their radical agenda.Adopting terrorism as a means, pro-sod activists set their vicious sights on D.r. David Reuben, one of the best - known psyc in the area of human sxu in 1974.

Everyone should learn science as science, and that includes understanding what Scientific Theory is and why it's an entirely different definition of «theory».

It took years of studying the history in which the Bible was written, learning about the other influences that often aren't taught in religious settings... and considering those religious influences, as well as the scientific and philosophical influences... to reach to the conclusions I have reached today — though I admit they still aren't and never will be perfect (like when I said IT doesn't care.

In this episode of the One Verse Podcast, you will see why we can not read Genesis 1:14 - 19 as a scientific explanation of how the sun, moon, and stars came to be, and you will also learn from the text what three purposes these celestial lights serve in.

Modern medicine will become really scientific only when physicians and their patients have learned to manage the forces of the body and the mind that operate in vis mediatrix naturae.

Where Rubio's statement went all to heck is the point where he questions the scientific consensus on the Earth's age, which calls into question everything we have learned in the past 500 years, and the validity of the scientific method itself.

This essay was written with the conviction that the curriculums of all institutions of higher learning should include courses in the religio - scientific study of a variety of religions, including some of the major religions of the East as well as the Judeo - Christian religious traditions of the West.

Finally, we learn from Robert Langdon, the novel's hero, that the so - called Priory of Sion's aim has been to present «to the world thousands of ancient documents as scientific evidence that the New Testament is false testimony» (451).