Sentences with phrase «of scientific research as»

I referred to my experience with my professors because in addition to teaching, they engage in the same sort of scientific research as Dr. Lacis.

Instead of racing ahead on the next cutting - edge discovery, our scientists are left wondering if they'll get to start any new projects, any new research projects at all over the next few years, which means that we could lose a year, two years of scientific research as a practical matter because of misguided priorities here in this town.

The Harder You Look is a temporary art institute that takes inspiration from and follows the procedures of scientific research as a tool for thinking and producing collaboratively.

Also known as the Sacred Monkey Forest of Padangtegal, and by its official designation as Mandala Wisata Wenara Wana, Ubud Monkey Forest is a place of scientific research as well as a site of spiritual and cultural aspects with temples sanctified by the local villagers deep within its grounds.

The court ruled that Japan's JARPA II program, which sought to take some 850 minke whales, 50 fin whales, and 50 humpback whales, was not for the purposes of scientific research as stipulated in the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling.

Astrobiology has one key advantage when it comes to tooting its own horn — it can lay claim to a diverse range of scientific research as being relevant to the study of life in the universe.

«I believe in applying the outcomes of scientific research as a low risk approach to achieving your goals,» he says.

Not exact matches

One way to ensure you have the requisite medical proof is to research scientific papers on the subject, such as those from the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

«Sitting is the new smoking,» headlines have blared, as a parade of scientific research has uncovered the truly terrible effects of having your backside planted in one place all day (including making you not just sicker but also dumber).

Cancer vaccines are largely not regarded as a standalone treatment within the scientific community, and immunotherapy stills demand several years of intense research.

But to every rule there is an exception, and glad I was to be called out (and called up) by the founder and CEO of one mobile - health company whose entire premise is based on scientific research with repeatable results — the exact study, in fact, I had used as my example of what works better than a health app.

The no - holds - barred piece draws on recent research published in Teaching and Teacher Education, as well as older reviews of the scientific literature on so - called digital natives, to review whether the recent mania for tech in education has solid scientific foundations.

While discounting subjective criteria such as eye and skin color, the site scores users out of 10 according to a specific algorithm that «takes into account many factors from neoclassical beauty, modern research papers, and our own scientific studies,» the company said.

Author Carmine Gallo, who has written on the history of TED Talks, cites scientific research from Dr. Paul King of Texas Christian University as well as insight into how the brain processes new information (and expends energy while doing so).

Research curation as a vehicle for scientific insight and the public understanding of science Principal Investigator: Frank Bosco, Virginia Commonwealth University Co-Investigator: Piers Steel $ 50,000

The Chinese government body of scientific research has provided a platform type of Blockchain - as - a-Service (Baas) to keep track of the individual and the supply chain.

Because of the world - wide recognition of Dr. Cialdini's cutting - edge scientific research and his ethical business and policy applications, he is frequently regarded as the «Godfather of Influence.»

I want everyone who acts as if this type of thinking is inconsequential to consider this: To accept creationism requires a complete disregard for carefully and elegantly researched scientific evidence, and 40 + % of people in America do so.

At the same time as an ever more bloated scientific bureaucracy churns out masses of research results, the majority of which are likely outright false, scientists themselves are lauded as heroes and science is upheld as the only legitimate basis for policy - making.

A recent paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research studied what happens to scientific subfields when star researchers die suddenly and at the peak of their abilities, and finds that while there is considerable evidence that young researchers are reluctant to challenge scientific superstars, a sudden and unexpected death does not significantly improve the situation, particularly when «key collaborators of the star are in a position to channel resources (such as editorial goodwill or funding) to insiders.»

[65] He sometimes retorted sharply, «I am sorry to have to inform you that I do not believe in the Bible as a divine revelation, & therefore not in Jesus Christ as the Son of God», [66] and at other times was more guarded, telling a young count studying with Haeckel that «Science has nothing to do with Christ; except in so far as the habit of scientific research makes a man cautious in admitting evidence.

His so - called study doesn't match 30 years of scientific research that shows overwhelmingly that children raised by parents who are LGBT do equally as well.

I'm sure you've done plenty of rigorous scientific research in the lab and in the field, published articles in peer - reviewed scientific journals, and are widely recognized as one of the leading members of your particular field.

Much of the research has now been transferred to Arizona, The Pontifical Academy of Sciences was established as a sign of the Church's commitment to scientific research.

He urges us to «recognize belief once more as the source of all knowledge» and insists that scientific research is carried on only within «a fiduciary framework».

Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»

From my perspective as a process theologian, the theistic account is fuller and more fundamental, but it is not necessary to the advance of scientific research.

As he researched these, the author began to see the powerful scientific evidence for creation as well as the evidence for the historical reliability of the BibleAs he researched these, the author began to see the powerful scientific evidence for creation as well as the evidence for the historical reliability of the Bibleas well as the evidence for the historical reliability of the Bibleas the evidence for the historical reliability of the Bible..

Finally, drawing mainly from the thinking of contemporary Calvinist and Lutheran theologians, the authors discuss the implications of recent scientific research on theological views about the human being as a creature made in the image of God.

I certainly have not done any sort of scientific research into this segment of the population, but I work in an environment where I get to interact with a lot of religious and non-religious people, and I have had countless conversations with people who probably count as one of the 35 million people who used to attend church and identify as Christian, but no longer do.

It is as though the underlying picture of theological schooling came from engineering: we receive theories from «pure» scientific research, generalize applied theory from parts or from implications of the «pure» theory, and then devise techniques and technologies governed by the applied theory to solve well - defined practical problems.

While it maybe be true that large pools of institutional money are better at buying political favors, influencing scientific research, and swaying foreign governments, it has always been known and is frequently demonstrated that individuals always do better at loving and caring for other individuals, tend to be wiser stewards of money, and view their giving and service toward others as a means of actually helping them, rather than a means to gain political power or popular prestige.

In my opinion if someone thinks that a collection of books written by many people with hundreds of witnesses can be tampered with, then certainly scientific research and data can be tampered with as well.

In addition, scientific journals continue to push the issue of embryonic stem - cell research in their editorial and commentary sections, using it as a prime criterion to grade political candidates.

because it sounds like a response, when of course there is no such thing as a peer reviewed scientific research of ANY historical event.

For a summary of some of the scientific research which supports the view that the fetus is not a prepackaged human being (e.g., even something so relatively simple as a fingerprint arises at least in part due to chance events not present in a fertilized egg) see Charles Gardner, «Is an Embryo a Person?

Confine burgeoning expenditures to real medical research, early hospitalization costs, and scientific studies; and reduce money's importance as a factor in prevention, treatment, recovery, and the sustenance of government, non-profit, business, and religious agencies.

Another man went to Los Alamos because of technical scientific interest in what he thought of as exciting pure research with excellent equipment.

As research progresses we will, hopefully, enlarge the discussion, including other individuals from both sides of the scientific fence.

That night José Delgado — a pioneer in the control of behavior through electrical and chemical means — spoke of the fact that his researches raised questions that required answers not provided by scientific knowledge as such.

Co., 1978); Thomas C. Campbell and Yoshio Fukuyama, The Fragmented Layman: An Empirical Study of Lay Attitudes (Philadelphia: Pilgrim Press, 1970); James D. Davidson, «Religious Belief as an Independent Variable,» Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 11 (1972): 65 - 75; James D. Davidson, «Religious Belief as a Dependent Variable,» Sociological Analysis 33 (1972): 81 - 94; James D. Davidson, «Patterns of Belief at the Denominational and Congregational Levels,» Review of Religious Research 13 (1972): 197 - 205; David R. Gibbs, Samuel A. Miller, and James R. Wood, «Doctrinal Orthodoxy, Salience and the Consequential Dimension,» Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 12 (1973): 33 - 52; William McKinney, and others, Census Data for Community Mission (New York: Board for Homeland Ministries, United Church of Christ, 1983), part of a denomination - wide study of census data relevant to each congregation in the United Church of Christ; David O. Moberg, `' Theological Position and Institutional Characteristics of Protestant Congregations: An Explanatory Study,» Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 9 (1970): 53 - 58; Wade Clark Roof, Community and Commitment; Thomas Sweetser, The Catholic Parish: Shifting Membership in a Changing Church (Chicago: Center for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1974).

Thus, what Whitehead speculatively sketched out as a metaphysician, always in the hope that his principles and categories could be transposed to the individual forms of scientific research, has at least in part proved a success in its naturalistic variants.

Despite its demonization as a right wing Christian rejection of modern science if not modernity as a whole, the language of Bush's order manages to acknowledge the serious and profound ethical dilemmas that surround stem cell research and to clearly articulate both the scientific and moral principles that ground its decisions.

We debate endlessly about Peace, Democracy, the Rights of Man, the conditions of racial and individual eugenics, the value and morality of scientific research pushed to the uttermost limit, and the true nature of the Kingdom of God; but here again, how can we fail to see that each of these inescapable questions has two aspects, and therefore two answers, according to whether we regard the human species as culminating in the individual or as pursuing a collective course towards higher levels of complexity and consciousness?

Moreover, the natural scientific model for research that dominated the new academic profession proclaimed, as we shall see, the irrelevance of religious belief.

This is precisely the outcome of his investigation into the essence of modern scientific research wherein its «representing pursues and entraps nature as a calculable coherence of forces» - or nature as a system artificially challenged forth by the image of the world as picture and the picture as world.

[ix] He understands a scientific system as organizing reality through research, methodology, and investigation in terms of a specific mode of rationality in which the defining of fact is verified in terms of domain - specific rules and laws.

In terms of scientific policy these figures seem to reflect a disproportionate emphasis on applied work and on the physical sciences, to the neglect of pure research and biology, as well as of the social fields whose growth is essential if technology is to contribute to human welfare.

Centuries of research, tens of thousands of fossils unearthed, dated with the most reliable scientific methods (radioactive istopes such as Carbon - 14, potassium - argon, uranium - lead, etc), ample amounts of geological data, comparing rock formations from Africa and South America, from the British Isles and the Appalachians, coming to the evidence that these rocks were once united under the same continent (Pangaea, Gondwanaland, Rodinia, etc), etc, etc...

As long as you embrace these nutcases whose goal it is to throw out scientific research and knowledge altogether in favor of the BIBLE as a science textbook, the less likely you will EVER see the inside of the Oval Office agaiAs long as you embrace these nutcases whose goal it is to throw out scientific research and knowledge altogether in favor of the BIBLE as a science textbook, the less likely you will EVER see the inside of the Oval Office agaias you embrace these nutcases whose goal it is to throw out scientific research and knowledge altogether in favor of the BIBLE as a science textbook, the less likely you will EVER see the inside of the Oval Office agaias a science textbook, the less likely you will EVER see the inside of the Oval Office again.