Sentences with phrase «of sea surface temps»

Yes, but this study claims that by selecting those die which cast a series which corresponds by chance to the realization of sea surface temps and then through selection of those which correspond to hiatus surface temps, over a bunch of initial conditions, it's a better comparison than between models output and reality.

Not exact matches

Includes all of the Coastal package features plus Offshore Sea Surface Temps, extended Weather, Wind and Wave Forecasts, US & Canadian Alerts.

The sea is in a constant state of flux, so the temp at the surface is very close to that at 100».

This means that, e.g., if heat moves from the tropical surface water (temp about 25C) to surface waters at lower temps, the net effect is a subsidence of sea level — even without any change in total heat content.

Hurricanes do have a deep surface mixing effect that normal tropical convection doesn't produce, and that would be expected to result in greater transfer of heat to the atmosphere, but it gets complicated in a hurry; see the realclimate discussion of the Walker circulation for example, as well as the link between hurricanes and sea surface temps.

Given that the other important variables (sea surface temps, depth of the warm layer, and atmospheric moisture) are all predicted to increase, it seems hard to make the claim that tropical cyclones will be unchanged, just as it seemed unwise to claim that Lyman et al's «Recent cooling of the upper oceans» meant that climate models had fatal flaws.

There is good evidence that the answer to both these question is no: (The insensitivy of the results to methodology of selecting rural stations, the Parker et al windy days study, and the fact that data from satellite skin surface measurements, from sea surface temperatures, deep ocean temps as we as tropospheric temps are all in good agreement).

(> 70 % of the Pale Blue Dot is covered in H2O, so sea surface temps can swamp land surface temps, even tho the latter may «outnumber» the former by orders of magnitude.)

It's not entirely clear to me whether he's talking about the peak in sea surface temps or whether he was expecting the January UAH data to have peaked, but February came back and blew January out of the water (so to speak).

«One of the major modes of climate variability is El Niño and when we're in El Niño there's a large area of warm sea surface temps in the Pacific,» this leads to more precipitation on the West Coast, Crouch said.

Source: press release for Myers et al., 2015 Sea Levels 2 - 4 m Higher Until ~ 5,000 Years Ago Imply Surface Temps Were At Least 5 °C Warmer According to the accepted (IPCC) formula for calculating the contribution of ocean warming (thermal expansion) to sea level rise upon reaching equilibrium, every additional degrees Celsius of surface warmth yields -LSB-.Sea Levels 2 - 4 m Higher Until ~ 5,000 Years Ago Imply Surface Temps Were At Least 5 °C Warmer According to the accepted (IPCC) formula for calculating the contribution of ocean warming (thermal expansion) to sea level rise upon reaching equilibrium, every additional degrees Celsius of surface warmth yields -LSurface Temps Were At Least 5 °C Warmer According to the accepted (IPCC) formula for calculating the contribution of ocean warming (thermal expansion) to sea level rise upon reaching equilibrium, every additional degrees Celsius of surface warmth yields -LSB-.sea level rise upon reaching equilibrium, every additional degrees Celsius of surface warmth yields -Lsurface warmth yields -LSB-...]

And also, no mention of clouds and the 31C limit on tropical sea surface temp.

The correlation not causation of declining solar cycles and declining PDO and south Atlantic sea surface temp is getting interesting to watch.

A CURRENT EXAMPLE OF EXTREME SEA SURFACE TEMPS AFFECTING THE EXTREME PRECIPITATION EVENT THAT HIT THE U.S. WEST

If sea OHC has continually & steadily been rising, and since this mass x Cp is 93 % of the total mass x Cp of the globe, then obviously if a OWASLT was reported, then it would also be steadily climbing year after year on the same steady rate (even during the last 10 years when the rate - of - rise of surface - only temps was less than the 1990's).

«Global Warming» has been sold since 1988 on the basis of the land surface and sea surface temp reports.

2) The satellite tropospheric and sea surface (SST) data differ from the HADCRUT surface temp anomaly, with the present temperatures of both right at the same level as in 1991 (while Fig. 1 here shows an increase over 1991 of about 0.25 °C).

Oh, but they did say which set of models were selected for showing sea surface temps.

But it actually makes sense: El Ninos raise atmospheric temps because a deep pool of warm water in the western Pacific gets spread out over a larger area, raising sea surface temperatures over a big chunk of the Pacific.

We have only tiny, slow increases in surface temps and tiny, slow increases in sea level rise, which have never ever been a problem for the inhabitants of the earth to deal with.

If it takes over 100 - 200 years, as some estimate, to turn over the ocean the warming of the sea surface will continue to warm the deep ocean for decades even if the sea surface temp falls as long as the surface temp remains above the moving average temp for whatever the ocean turnover rate is.

There is a massive drop in temperatures from the surface of the sea to the underlying depths in the tropics and virtually none in the polar areas, in fact a lot of the polar surface temps are at or below zero.

The thermal expansion coefficient of sea water (in units of 10 ^ -7 / °C) ranges from 254 (at surface / -2 °C) to 1269 (at ~ 2000m / 2 °C) with higher values with increasing temps (especially at the surface).

Steve, when TREND of UAH - ocean matches SST well, while TREND of UAH - land is considderably colder than ground based land — you just focus on the fact that UAH temps oscillates on very short term more than sea surface temps?