Sentences with phrase «of sibling preference»

Please contact the schools you are interested in for further details on how they define sibling for the purpose of sibling preference.

Not exact matches

«Consumers don't necessarily connect the dots that if someone knows their political preferences, their health history, their favorite flavor of ice cream, their mother's maiden name, the names of all of their siblings, the name of their pets, and where they've been in sequence in the last six months, that's an awful lot of information that could be used,» she said.

The lottery process for oversubscribed grades gave preference first to students who previously attended the school and their siblings, then to low - income students applying to schools that previously did not have a majority of low - income students, and finally to students applying to a school within their «choice zone» (which would guarantee them access to district - provided transportation).

Students are chosen through a complex lottery system, and preference is given to siblings of students.

Charters can offer a lottery preference to their pre-K students but must give higher priority to children with siblings enrolled in other grades of the school — whether or not they attended pre-K there.

In practice, about a fifth of lottery winners never attend a charter school, and some lottery losers eventually end up in a charter school (by entering a future admissions lottery, gaining sibling preference when a sibling wins the lottery, or moving off a waitlist after the offers coded by our instrument were made).

Schools may only give preference to siblings of current students or students enrolled in nearby district schools that have received a «D» or «F» grade.

Preference for enrollment is given to a sibling of an enrolled student.

If more students apply than the school has space for, it must fill the slots through a lottery (except that siblings of already - enrolled students get preference).

While the school is not a boundary school, where students are granted priority spot if they live in a certain place, the school does hold a preference for students that attend the preschool, students who live in The Villages of East Lake and East Lake and Kirkwood neighborhoods, and students with siblings at the school, which means regardless of the demand for seats from surrounding communities, the school will continue to primarily serve low - income families in the East Lake community.

Students are admitted through an open, state - monitored lottery every spring, with siblings of current students given preference.

Student - school matches are based on the number of available spaces at each school; sibling, proximity, and other lottery preferences; how each student ranked his or her school choices; and each student's random lottery number.

If students who apply after you qualify for a lottery preference (such as in - boundary, sibling attending, etc.) that you do not qualify for, then it is possible that they will be placed ahead of your child on the waitlist and your child's number will increase.

Thanks to sibling preference, however, she wasn't going to have the risk of not attending a KIPP middle school.

Preference is given to siblings of current students, and there is a waiting list to enroll, staff said.

In the lottery, siblings of enrolled students who attend KABPCS at the time an offer of admission is made, will be given preference over non-sibling applicants for admission KABPCS.

The bill requires charter schools to give enrollment preferences to siblings and children of school employees.

All schools give preference to siblings of students currently enrolled.

Siblings of pupils who are actively enrolled at WSD are given preference in the lottery.In accordance with Utah State law, the WSD lottery selects students at random throughout the lottery season with preference at each lottery given to designated groups.

Siblings of current students will be given preference in the school placement process as long as enrolled siblings are identified in the applSiblings of current students will be given preference in the school placement process as long as enrolled siblings are identified in the applsiblings are identified in the application.

Notwithstanding this subsection, upon application by the board of trustees of a charter school or by the persons or entities seeking to establish a charter school, the board may amend or grant a charter designating such school a regional charter school; provided, however, that such regional charter school shall be exempt from the local preference provision of this paragraph; provided further, that such regional charter school shall continue to grant a preference of siblings of currently enrolled students; and provided further, that if the number of applicants remaining is greater than the number of spaces available, such regional charter school shall conduct a single lottery to determine which applicants shall be admitted.

In a separate action, the board approved a resolution affirming that siblings of current JCC students will receive the same kindergarten admissions preferences as students at other campuses.

A sibling of a resident student currently enrolled in the charter school may also be given enrollment preference.

(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary.

In Virginia, a court may consider any of the following factors, among others, in making a decision: The age and physical and mental condition of the child, giving due consideration to the child's changing developmental needs; the age and physical and mental condition of each parent; the relationship existing between each parent and each child, giving due consideration to the positive involvement with the child's life, the ability to accurately assess and meet the emotional, intellectual and physical needs of the child; the needs of the child, giving due consideration to other important relationships of the child, including but not limited to siblings, peers and extended family members; the role that each parent has played and will play in the future, in the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determination.

Virginia law dictates factors that judges must consider in awarding custody, including the child's age and physical and mental condition, the parents» ages as well as their physical and mental conditions, the parent - child relationships, the child's relationship with siblings and extended family, each parents» history as caregiver, each parent's willingness to support the child's bond with the other parent, the child's preference, and any history of family abuse.

These factors include the child = s sibling relationships, the preference of the child, the attempts of one parent to turn the child against the other parent, any history of drug or alcohol abuse, and any other relevant factors.

Where the limitations of RCW 26.09.191 are not dispositive of the child's residential schedule, the court shall consider the following factors: (i) The relative strength, nature, and stability of the child's relationship with each parent; (ii) The agreements of the parties, provided they were entered into knowingly and voluntarily; (iii) Each parent's past and potential for future performance of parenting functions as defined in RCW 26.09.004 (3), including whether a parent has taken greater responsibility for performing parenting functions relating to the daily needs of the child; (iv) The emotional needs and developmental level of the child; (v) The child's relationship with siblings and with other significant adults, as well as the child's involvement with his or her physical surroundings, school, or other significant activities; (vi) The wishes of the parents and the wishes of a child who is sufficiently mature to express reasoned and independent preferences as to his or her residential schedule; and (vii) Each parent's employment schedule, and shall make accommodations consistent with those schedules.

Courts do not like to divide siblings, so a split custody order is only considered after a court examines the age and maturity of each child, as well as the children's preferences.

(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary

In contrast, perceptions of mothers» favoritism did not predict which siblings daughters favored, although perceptions of mothers» disfavoritism did predict respondents» preferences.

Drawing on scholarship on tie preferences within established networks, we suggest two processes through which perceptions of patterns of maternal favoritism are likely to shape within - family variations in sibling closeness.

Although we argued that this pattern would occur regardless of the respondents» favored or disfavored status, mothers» preferences are influential only when respondents» differential associations with siblings has the potential to affect their own status.