In particular, there exists a long history
of simple climate models.
If the mathematics
of simple climate models fail to provide us with robust solutions and if the arithmatic of complex climate models produce similar outcomes (roughly the same results but still non-robust), why not solve the climate issue with philosophy.
Not exact matches
The researchers from Wageningen University & Research, Bogor Agricultural University in Indonesia, University
of East Anglia and the Center for International Forestry Research analysed the spatially distributed pattern
of hydrological drought, that is the drought in groundwater recharge, in Borneo using a
simple transient water balance
model driven by monthly
climate data from the period 1901 - 2015.
Three approaches were used to evaluate the outstanding «carbon budget» (the total amount
of CO2 emissions compatible with a given global average warming) for 1.5 °C: re-assessing the evidence provided by complex Earth System
Models, new experiments with an intermediate - complexity
model, and evaluating the implications
of current ranges
of uncertainty in
climate system properties using a
simple model.
Over the next decade a few scientists devised
simple mathematical
models of the
climate, and turned up feedbacks that could make the system surprisingly variable.
In a recent study, Mathias Trachsel (Dept.
of Biology, University
of Bergen) and Atle Nesje (Dept.
of Earth Science, University
of Bergen and Uni Research
Climate) used
simple statistical
models to assess and quantify the relative importance
of summer temperature and winter precipitation for annual mass balances
of eight Scandinavian glaciers.
For the study «Doubling
of coastal erosion under rising sea level by mid-century in Hawaiʻi,» published this week in Natural Hazards, the research team developed a
simple model to assess future erosion hazards under higher sea levels — taking into account historical changes
of Hawaiʻi shorelines and the projected acceleration
of sea level rise reported from the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC).
The
model is
simple and straightforward,» says Nico Bauer
of the Potsdam Institute for
Climate Impact Research in Germany.
There are two possibilities: 1) using a
climate model, this implies a perfect knowledge
of all involved climatic mechanisms, and nobody has such a knowledge yet; 2) use a
simpler phenomenological approach.
Moreover, similar answers were found in different
climate models, suggesting that this is a very
simple way
of ascertaining some
of the mechanisms that can explain
climate system response to
climate change.
Example
of a
simple linear regression
model of climate change.
He promoted the use
of water stable isotopomers for reconstructing past
climate changes from ice cores and with associated atmospheric
modelling using both dynamically
simple and General Circulation
Models (GCMs).
Another approach uses the response
of climate models, most often simple climate models or Earth System Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs, Table 8.3) to explore the range of forcings and climate parameters that yield results consistent with observations (Andronova and Schlesinger, 2001; Forest et al., 2002; Harvey and Kaufmann, 2002; Knutti et al., 2002, 2003; Forest et al.,
models, most often
simple climate models or Earth System Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs, Table 8.3) to explore the range of forcings and climate parameters that yield results consistent with observations (Andronova and Schlesinger, 2001; Forest et al., 2002; Harvey and Kaufmann, 2002; Knutti et al., 2002, 2003; Forest et al.,
models or Earth System
Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs, Table 8.3) to explore the range of forcings and climate parameters that yield results consistent with observations (Andronova and Schlesinger, 2001; Forest et al., 2002; Harvey and Kaufmann, 2002; Knutti et al., 2002, 2003; Forest et al.,
Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs, Table 8.3) to explore the range
of forcings and
climate parameters that yield results consistent with observations (Andronova and Schlesinger, 2001; Forest et al., 2002; Harvey and Kaufmann, 2002; Knutti et al., 2002, 2003; Forest et al., 2006).
«
Simple physics (effect of [sea - level rise] on storm surge) and simple thermodynamics (i.e. Clausius - Clapeyron) are valid whether or not we can trust the models to get the specifics dynamical linkages between climate change and extreme weather events right (and I'm deeply skeptical the models are up to this task at present).&
Simple physics (effect
of [sea - level rise] on storm surge) and
simple thermodynamics (i.e. Clausius - Clapeyron) are valid whether or not we can trust the models to get the specifics dynamical linkages between climate change and extreme weather events right (and I'm deeply skeptical the models are up to this task at present).&
simple thermodynamics (i.e. Clausius - Clapeyron) are valid whether or not we can trust the
models to get the specifics dynamical linkages between
climate change and extreme weather events right (and I'm deeply skeptical the
models are up to this task at present).»
linking probabilistic
simple climate models, complex Earth system
models, and econometric analyses
of historical weathering and
climate impacts to project future risks associated with
climate change and improve estimates
of the social cost
of carbon.
In a recently published interview, Paul Hawken, an environmentalist, and Executive Director
of Project Drawdown, a global coalition
of researchers, scientists, and economists that
models the impacts
of global warming, made a spot - on observation about the pitfalls
of seeking a
simple, single solution to
climate change.
A comprehensive list
of advanced, comfort and convenience - enhancing options will include Bi-HID headlamps, an Adaptive Front Lighting System (AFS), Automatic High Beam (AHB), automatic
climate control, Smart Entry and Push Start, a Skyview panoramic sunroof, the Toyota Touch and Go navigation system, a JBL Premium audio system and, standard on Lounge grade
models,
Simple Intelligent Park Assist (SIPA).
However, the general circulation
models are, at present, timeconsuming and expensive to run, and, despite the known shortcomings
of the one - dimensional
models, most available predictions
of climate change have been made using the
simpler models.
(This genre
of one - dimensional and two - dimensional
models lay between the rudimentary, often qualitative models covered in the essay on Simple Models of Climate and the elaborate three - dimensional General Circulation Models of the Atmosp
models lay between the rudimentary, often qualitative
models covered in the essay on Simple Models of Climate and the elaborate three - dimensional General Circulation Models of the Atmosp
models covered in the essay on
Simple Models of Climate and the elaborate three - dimensional General Circulation Models of the Atmosp
Models of Climate and the elaborate three - dimensional General Circulation
Models of the Atmosp
Models of the Atmosphere.)
If we had done a
simple back -
of - the - envelope estimate, surely someone would have criticized us for not using a
climate model... Besides we also looked into regional patterns and the sea - ice response in our paper, something one can not do without a
climate model.
Bayesian estimation
of climate sensitivity based on a
simple climate model fitted to observations oh hemispheric temperature and global ocean heat content.
Three IPCC
climate models, recent NASA Aqua satellite data, and a
simple 3 - layer
climate model are used together to demonstrate that the IPCC
climate models are far too sensitive, resulting in their prediction
of too much global warming in response to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions.
simple «
model» and with a
climate sensitivity
of 0.75 °C.
To get an idea
of why this is, we can start with the
simplest 1D energy balance equilibrium
climate model:
In this
simple model, the steady perturbation changes the
climate in a highly linear manner — increasing r again to 30 would add the same change on top
of that shown for 26 to 28, and r = 27 would sit half - way between the cases shown.
Some
of them are optimal fingerprint detection studies (estimating the magnitude
of fingerprints for different external forcing factors in observations, and determining how likely such patterns could have occurred in observations by chance, and how likely they could be confused with
climate response to other influences, using a statistically optimal metric), some
of them use
simpler methods, such as comparisons between data and
climate model simulations with and without greenhouse gas increases / anthropogenic forcing, and some are even based only on observations.
Even really
simple, naive
models do a good job
of reproducing
climate.
Interestingly, our results are actually pretty consistent with a lot
of the recent literature on sensitivity: All studies comparing
simple models with recent
climate change (from Andronova and Schlesinger, 2001, onwards) find high sensitivities (more than 8K, say) are consistent (at the few - percent level) with the observed record unless they are ruled out a priori.
Personally I think
simple (
climate without weather)
models are important and ultimately the way forward, but they must meet the all harsh criteria
of the observed
climate simultaneously or they are simply to
simple for purpose.
Or it may be caused by any other mechanism (like the influence
of solar changes on the jet stream position) which enhance the
simple direct insolation change which is incorporated in several current
climate models...
We employed two different
climate model simulations: (1) the simulation of the NCAR CSM 1.4 coupled atmosphere - ocean General Circulation Model (GCM) analyzed by Ammann et al (2007) and (2) simulations of a simple Energy Balance Model (
model simulations: (1) the simulation
of the NCAR CSM 1.4 coupled atmosphere - ocean General Circulation
Model (GCM) analyzed by Ammann et al (2007) and (2) simulations of a simple Energy Balance Model (
Model (GCM) analyzed by Ammann et al (2007) and (2) simulations
of a
simple Energy Balance
Model (
Model (EBM).
I also wonder how you morons in the denialist camp got the idea that
climate sensitivity is some sort
of simple parameter one dials into the
models.
Not only is the
climate of the Lorenz
model easy to understand, it is also
simple to predict how it will respond to a variety
of «external forcings», in the form
of either a parameter perturbation or direct forcing term in the dynamical equations.
Bayesian estimation
of climate sensitivity based on a
simple climate model fitted to observations
of hemispheric temperatures and global ocean heat content
If so, the actual
models are in serious trouble because none
of them is able to reproduce this temperature patter, and they might need a much stronger
climate sensitivity to solar cycle that might include a lot
of things in addition to the
simple TSI forcing.
During the next decade a few scientists worked up
simple mathematical
models of the planet's
climate system and turned up feedbacks that could make the system surprisingly sensitive.
MAGICC is itself a collection
of simple gas - cycle,
climate, and ice - melt
models to efficiently emulate the output
of complex
climate models.
This
simpler test for consistency is
of particular interest for quantities where the magnitudes for the base
climate vary across
models.
We have used the
Model for the Assessment of Greenhouse - gas Induced Climate Change (MAGICC)-- a simple climate model emulator that was, in part, developed through support of the EPA — to examine the climate impact of proposed regulat
Model for the Assessment
of Greenhouse - gas Induced
Climate Change (MAGICC)-- a simple climate model emulator that was, in part, developed through support of the EPA — to examine the climate impact of proposed regul
Climate Change (MAGICC)-- a
simple climate model emulator that was, in part, developed through support of the EPA — to examine the climate impact of proposed regul
climate model emulator that was, in part, developed through support of the EPA — to examine the climate impact of proposed regulat
model emulator that was, in part, developed through support
of the EPA — to examine the
climate impact of proposed regul
climate impact
of proposed regulations.
The current press campaign against Dr Soon began after he had co-authored a paper titled Why
models run hot: results from an irreducibly
simple climate model, published in January 2015 in China's leading learned journal
of scientific research, the Science Bulletin
of the Chinese Academy
of Sciences, co-sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation
of China.
Each
of the four authors
of the Science Bulletin paper has a lively and expert academic interest in our subject, and we wrote our paper because we considered — rightly, as events have turned out (for there have already been more than 22,500 downloads either
of the abstract or
of the full paper)-- that other researchers would find our
simple model of the
climate interesting and helpful.
The
model simulates most
of the main physical processes in the
climate system in a very simplistic way and therefore allows very fast and
simple climate model simulations on a normal PC computer.
(This essay is supplementary to the core essay on The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect For the most important greenhouse gas, water vapor, see the essay on
Simple Models of Climate.)
To start in, for the scientific story, a good starting - point is the keystone essay on the basic discoveries about The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect, followed perhaps by attempts to explain changes with
Simple Models of Climate.
Using a
simple, publically - available,
climate model emulator called MAGICC that was in part developed through support
of the EPA, we ran the numbers as to how much future temperature rise would be averted by a complete adoption and adherence to the EPA's new carbon dioxide restrictions *.
My point was that, if we accept this basic story (it's too
simple, even as an account
of how cultural cognition works; but that's in the nature
of «
models» & should give us pause only when the simplification detracts from rather than enhances our ability to predict and manage the dynamics
of the phenomenon in question), then there's no reason to view the valences
of the cultural meanings attached to crediting
climate change risk as fixed or immutable.
«Seasonal Cycle Experiments on
Climate Sensitivity Due to a Doubling
of CO2 with an Atmospheric General Circulation
Model Coupled to a
Simple Mixed Layer Ocean
Model.»
In fact,
simple models go a very long way in explaining a lot
of features in both weather and
climate, and people who claim otherwise simply haven't studied the subject.
Nothing is as
simple in the real world as it is in the digital world
of the
climate models that the Left uses to blame humanity and modernity for heating up the globe (the AGW hypothesis).
Experiments with coupled ocean - atmosphere general circulation
models (which represent the complexity
of the
climate system much more realistically than this
simple model) give similar results.