Sentences with phrase «of simple objects»

The pictures depict almost nothing but rumpled fabric, although the shapes of simple objects can sometimes be discerned beneath the complicated surfaces.

There's a certain beauty about the solitude of simple objects.

Onward into the future, Owen Kydd's «durational photographs» explore the near stillness of simple objects that come alive through subtle shifts of light and reflection.

Visitors are encouraged to speak with Lerma while he uses the gallery as an artist studio and to return on June 13 to see the finished piece, which addresses issues concerning labor and comments upon the effects of transient economic models, the authenticity of simple objects, and the beauty of impermanence.

The creation process also carries a lot of depth, you can create a number of simple objects and then chisel them down further.

This lesson plan is compliant with the following California State Standards: Grade Five Mathematics Content Standards: Measurement and Geometry 1.0 Students understand and compute the volumes and areas of simple objects: Grade Six Science Content Standards: Focus on Earth Science: Shaping Earth's Surface

Recognizing the difference in perspective of the left and right eyes, he began by making line drawings of each eye's view of simple objects.

Pushing the edges, often literally, of his primary disciplines, artist Tony DeLap has dedicated close to half a century to exploring the seam between sculpture and painting, merging the boarders of architecture, design and art, reducing to the most basic expression of form, shape, scale and color, while remaining devoted to the search for beauty in the creation of a simple object.

Not exact matches

The experiment itself was simple: a hundred and forty - five undergraduate students were given a standard test of creativity known as an «unusual use» task, in which they had two minutes to list as many uses as possible for mundane objects such as toothpicks, bricks, and clothes hangers.

If the first phase of 3D printing was about hulking industrial 3D printers that codified processes, and the second phase of 3D printing was about the hobbyist community using 3D printers, then the third phase, with printers like the Form 2, is about making 3D printing even more accessible by making it simple enough — and making the 3D printers small enough — so that it can go to every place where objects are designed and manufactured.

«Everyone's still in the mode of copying what Apple did largely, and the 3 - D does have the effect of wiping out simple spoofs — you can't hold up a picture anymore and expect it to do anything,» says Kevin Bowyer, a University of Notre Dame professor who studies biometrics and object recognition.

Likewise, even if people are not fond of a particular post, object, person or view, the simple act of clicking like, even when done with no profound intention or conviction, can lead to a rationalization process that will subconsciously make them feel positively about that post, object, person, etc..

You see, Newtons first law is simple fact: an object in motion stays in motion and an object out of motion stays out of motion unless acted upon by a net force.

The solution seems to be that the eternal ordering of the eternal objects is not one simple order but an indefinite variety of orders.

For example, a simple eternal object, say a «particular shade of green,» can be incorporated in «another eternal object of the lowest complex grade,» say «three definite colors with the spatio - temporal relatedness to each other of three faces of a regular tetrahedron, anywhere at any time» (SMW 166).

Although the simple eternal object defines a class of particulars that as values of the variable are that definite shade of green, and although these individuals are externally related, the simple eternal object itself is internally related to the higher grade object, in that it partially constitutes its essence.

This comparison of an actual entity to the structure of a linguistic proposition can be misleading, however, since the concrete wholeness of a process is the creating subject (which is closer to the simple predicate linguistically) and the subject / whole's parts are objects (the subjects linguistically).

With a certain simplification of the state of affairs, which however brings out more clearly the decisive factor without falsifying it, we might say that formerly the object and situation of a man's action were simply data supplied by nature with which he was in contact and by simple human realities which recurred from generation to generation again and again.

First x object was created out of nothing, then combined with other things created out of nothing, then magically an atom, yhen a cell, a molecule, then bacteria, single cell creatures, followed by simple sea creatures with organs, then more advanced creatures, next red blooded mammals, then primates, and finally human.

Indeed he went to great lengths, grappled with the formidable problem of the nature of light, made incredibly subtle distinctions between various types of change, all to explain the fact that in sight consciousness is consciousness of an object, pure and simple, apart from any feelings of bodily involvement.

Therefore on the one hand they call Him the Object of Love and Yearning as being Beautiful and Good, and on the other they call Him Yearning and Love as being a Motive - Power leading all things to Himself, Who is the only ultimate Beautiful and Good — yea, as being His own Self - Revelation and the Bounteous Emanation of His own Transcendent Unity, a Motion of Yearning simple, self - moved, self - acting, pre-existent in the Good, and overflowing from the Good into creation, and once again returning to the Good.6

«14 Following the assumption of simple location, 15 the cosmology derived from Galileo, Newton and Descartes persistently views the objects isolated by scientific method as though they were the fundamental units of the physical world itself.

I long for a society in which modernity would have its full place but without implying the denial of elementary principles of human and familial ecology; for a society in which the diversity of ways of being, of living, and of desiring is accepted as fortunate, without allowing this diversity to be diluted in the reduction to the lowest common denominator, which effaces all differentiation; for a society in which, despite the technological deployment of virtual realities and the free play of critical intelligence, the simplest words — father, mother, spouse, parents — retain their meaning, at once symbolic and embodied; for a society in which children are welcomed and find their place, their whole place, without becoming objects that must be possessed at all costs, or pawns in a power struggle.

Let us consider formally the abstractive hierarchy based upon the following group (g) of simple eternal objects:

With this method, we have not simply done away with linguistic clutter, we have made the positive assertion that the ultimate «simple» or constituents of things experienced are neither the objects of common sense nor the «scientific» objects of physical theory (electrons, quarks, and the like).

Two of those present objected to a simple statement to the effect that our responsibility to God rises above all other claims and responsibilities.

Cobb solves this problem by arguing that «the eternal ordering of the eternal objects is not one simple order but an indefinite variety of orders.

It is caused by the attachment of desire to specific objects... [and he adds] As we shall see, the relationship between attachment and addiction is not as simple as it might sound.

When the eternal object selected for this purpose was embodied in the physical pole of the actual occasion felt or prehended, that is, when it expresses how that actual occasion prehended its predecessors, then the simple physical feeling is» pure.»

His sole object as a teacher was «to lay down a pathway to the reading of sacred Scripture for the simple and uneducated.»

The sense of the kind of object to which the surrender is made has much to do with determining the precise complexion of the joy; and the whole phenomenon is more complex than any simple formula allows.

In the state of pure consciousness and pure being we are aware of that only, simple, immutable, self - existent, without form or object, and we feel that to be alone true and real.

This simple analogy shows all of the characteristics of an eternal object as it is displayed in an instantiation.

These «multiple contrasts» of eternal objects, which are formally but not actually analyzable into simpler constituent components, are central to Whitehead's understanding of the origins of novelty.

The idea of power, therefore, is simple even though it involves the interaction of two (Or more) distinct objects.

By considering the simplest instance of the physical ingression of eternal objects as in the case of two sensa (PR 115 / 176f), we see that the physical ingression of any eternal object requires the concurrent ingression of at least two other nonidentical eternal objects so that an actual contrast obtains.

Therefore, philosophical assertions are not simple, objective, detached descriptions of objects or of the external world.

Its teachings are very, very simple: There really are free and natural markets where the optimum value of things is assigned to them; everyone must compete with everyone; the worthy will prosper and the unworthy fail; those who succeed while others fail will be made deeply and justly happy by this experience, having had no other object in life; each of us is poorer for every cent that is used toward the wealth of all of us; governments are instituted among people chiefly to interfere with the working out of these splendid principles.

There is an infinite variety of degrees of order among which the two instances of the enduring object and the corpuscular society stand out with a certain simple clarity.

Gödel's result shows that not even in terms of numbers, the simplest objects we can specify, can natura naturans explain the individuality that we observe.

DE: This seems to me to be what his philosophy of organism should have gone for, and when he said he was trying to make this a bridge notion between the biological and physical sciences, I think the link is in his notion of the «non-uniform object» of which the simplest example is the wave.

In doing science we have, on the one hand, to try to formulate simple objects which express the most important causal relations between events, but at the same time we have to ensure that these objects include (as sub-objects) as many as possible of all those involved in the event.

Other nations in the ANE had advanced, it is true, well beyond the stage of a simple - minded identification of gods with natural forces or objects.

In simpler language, we may state that primordial objects in the universe (grounded in an ineffable reality) are causally transformed into a limited set of cosmological, biological and cultural entities, which at the same time, allows for an endless number of creative outcomes and novel possibilities.

If now «regularity» is defined in the sense of the «simplicity of stable mutual relations» (OT 183), then the concept of «simple thought - object of the sciences» can also be grasped more accurately.

But it is precisely not «this stone» which, as a simple event» or a «simple object,» makes possible this individual sense certainty and the communication of truth which is built upon this certainty; rather, it is the structure of the world «embodied» by the stone which performs this task.

I long for a society in which modernity would have its full place, without implying the denial of elementary principles of human and familial ecology; for a society in which the diversity of ways of being, of living and of desiring is accepted as fortunate, without allowing this diversity to be diluted in the reduction to the lowest common denominator, which effaces all differentiation; for a society in which, despite the technological deployment of virtual realities and the free play of critical intelligence, the simplest words» father, mother, spouse, parents» retain their meaning, at once symbolic and embodied; for a society in which children are welcomed and find their place, their whole place, without becoming objects that must be possessed at all costs or a pawns in a power struggle.

Thus, Bergson's proto - mentalism is also interpretable as the positive face of the critique of simple location.4 The fallacy of simple location is the basis for the view, in both physical and logical atomism, that the «individuality of the atom [and of objects in general] is based precisely on its [or their] ontological separation from other simply located entities» (BMP 309).

Use familiar objects to illustrate a number («We have four plates on the table because we have four people eating dinner tonight»), parts of the whole («We ate half of the pizza already»), or simple addition or subtraction («You had five slices of orange, and you ate two, so now you have... how many left?»).

I've been quilting for a very long time and still find it fascinating that a few simple scraps of fabric can make such beautiful objects.