Sentences with phrase «of slow attacks»

Gaffer will go for a more defensive format using a lone strike up front and a crowded mid field that will kind of slow our attack, i wish eboue and song start on the bench because its time to bring out the real Arsenal not trialists.

There is a light attack and a heavy attack and each attack can be charged for extra damage at the cost of a slower attacks and more energy.

Not exact matches

In the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks, when the U.S. closed its borders, many companies were forced to slow down or halt production.

Spear - phishing attacks will continue to grow in sophistication, and they show no sign of slowing in numbers.

A number of factors have contributed, including concerns about dropping oil prices, slowing growth in China and geopolitical tensions (among them, concerns over the Syrian civil war and refugee crisis and ISIS attacks).

Negative conditions in the general economy both in the United States and abroad, including conditions resulting from financial and credit market fluctuations and terrorist attacks in the United States, Europe or elsewhere, could cause a decrease in corporate spending on enterprise software in general and slow down the rate of growth of our business.

When in 169 one of the contestants, Menelaus, was returned to the office, Antiochus, who had already incurred the bitter resentment of faithful Jews by his interference, sought to correct his financial plight by entering the Temple himself and stripping it of its considerable movable wealth.31 Antiochus became at once the object of Judaism's bitterest hate; and no doubt in part in retaliation but also as an expression of this ardent Hellenist's frustration with a people slow to change, he effected an otherwise quite unprovoked attack on Jerusalem in 168.

I remember thinking dully: «I'm eating myself into a heart attack; I'm committing a slow form of suicide.»

The speech is informed of the slow progress of acquisition; and also of some prior attacks upon Canaan unwittingly assisting Israel's task («hornets» v. 28, cf. Josh.

4 Delicious recipes with tomatoes During the hot summer days enjoy the fresh tomato that protect the skin, stimulate the work of the pancreas, prevents thrombosis and heart attacks, and slows down aging.

the point im trying to make is that if we have a DM it will slow the counter attacks down, giving BFG a few extra seconds to read the play, therefore getting the best out of him...... im not a football manager or a coach, but its not only me who can see this flaw in our game, its the whole world.....

One sunny day in June doesn't make a hot summer... part of our 4th place junkie years that need to go in to football history... He maybe quick but he actually slows down movement from defence to attack Can't dribble or defend and his positional sense is average... Hundred grand a week is day light robbery by the whippet... And he crowds out better plays in squad and stops wenger investing in top quality we need... Might get 16 or 17 mill from some deluded team so sell qnd let's move on to better things... Dybala for example... Sanchez dybala drexler... Hmm

That's why Walcott is asked to play as a hold up striker, Ox is supposed to play off the shoulder of defenders, Podolski had to cover for Gibbs and rarely get in the box, Arteta had to cover the counter attack and pass sideways, and Gabriel has to be a slow, awkward white guy with great positioning.

Wenger lacks tactical flexibility We've watched all the games so far this season and we've witnessed Wenger on the sidelines with no Plan B playing the same way; slow build ups to attacks from the start of the whistle till the end of the match which worked a few times and failed most times which has resulted in our dropping out of the title race and the Capital One Cup.

This also has a negative impact on our build up play too because it slows up the speed of which we attack.

Slow, laboured and devoid of attacking ideas.

No passing side to side because of slow counter attack + Campbell is clinical and composed

We can also not play on the counter attack and use the pace of Sanchez and Iwobi as much because Giroud is too slow to keep up.

Giroud has changed the public opinion of how Arsenal attack, that is a really bad CF to make the neutrals think ARSENAL is the reason for the slow attack!

we are a much slower attacking team overall w the slug upfront, it does not fit their style of play, like a 1 barrel carburator on a 5L engine

We have seen plenty of games where Arsenal start the game slow, and lethargically, only for Rosicky to come on and add new emphasis to the attack, he isn't afraid of making a few tackles either.

Arsenal's attack has been ineffective for most of the season so - far, slow and useless horizontal passing, no penetrating runs from attackers, and our defenders push wayyy to high up the pitch to try to facilitate the attack leaving acres of space for counter attacking teams to exploit.

Looking at the strange 4 -3-2-1 formation the ex-Barca boss played, it's clear that there was no width in their attack and therefore the same kind of predictable, narrow, slow, passing football that Chelsea soaked up against Guardiola's side at the Nou Camp in 2012.

seems to me, ever since Giroud got caught in da sack, he has turned his attitude around, he seems slighter and faster, i used to complain daily about him, he was slow, always out of position, now he is attacking the ball, finding gaps, someone did a nice job developing him, i was wrong on OG,

Had Arsenal played that way throughout the match, they would have probably left the Vitality Stadium with three points, but the generally slow, ball - stopping attack of Arsenal wasted Lacazette's pace and agility.

They have to revert to 4 -4-2 and start fast counter attacking instead of possession and short passing game... Now when ever Arsenal players get possession, they slows down the game until the opposite box gets crowded and loses the ball inside the box....

Lopez commands double - teams around the rim, but the rest of the Nets were too slow to get any separation on the perimeter, making attacking the rim a tricky proposition with the big man in the lineup.

He also came on against Chelsea and slowed our gameplay right down, whilst also offering no means of attack whatsoever.

Arteta was really a slow holding midfielder, Le Coq is an out and out smash attacks and get that ball terrier type of DM.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Giroud's lack of pace prevents us playing on the counter attack and using Ozil's ability to see defense splitting passes because Giroud is too slow to latch on to them.

Speed of attacks — further to the above — all other options in the middle slow down the attack compared to Cazorla.

Giroud does contribute to this because his style of play slows down the attack and others look to him to set up an attack.

The love affair with the fabregas like players, possession of the ball, slowed down attacks, frail players, taking on too much responsibilities (which transformed you into a DICTATOR) and the lost of the DM type player, is now what your name stands for.

Wenger's play is much slower and demands a lot of acclimatisation to perfect the passing side of the game and to be honest curb naturally attacking players.

Playing Walcott as our striker will give us a different dimension, we will b tearing teams apart wid a front 3 full of pace trickery and goals, our attack will become very dynaminc, we will b hitting teams on counterattacks (giroud always slows d play because of his speed) and our midfield will flourish as Dey will find it easy to provide running passes and thru balls.

This match was so important to the club and the fans that Wenger had to allow Flamini as a striker and Ramsey as a ultra attacking player who does not follow the midfield rule of protecting a slow player in mertesacker and all the full - backs in attack.

The rojiblancos started to control more of the ball in possession as well, deciding to slow Real Madrid's attack by starving them of the ball as much as possible since they had struggled to contain them otherwise.

And due to his lack of height he will not win much in the air, so failing to attack the post tends to lead to either the cross going to the opposition, or Arsenal having to slow things down and return the ball to the middle of the park.

The new DM must be the attacking kind that will not only score goals but should equally be to the task of cutting out or slow down the opponent's attacking threats from the root to stop them play their game and thus kill their game.

This is EPL wenger should try and focus more on defence, our system is too much of attack whereas there is no superstar to do the magic, we only base on fast pass tempo, a well organized team, just need to keep the ball from us, play from the back, slow down the tempo and we are well beating.

If the midfield chooses not to pass then it is a wasted run but the attackers can make runs and attack space irrespective of whether the midfield is slow or good at passing

Santi, Falmini, Ramsey, Wilshere, Arteta, Monreal, Mert, Chamber etc very slow players, just a bit of pace and any team can just counter attack us with ease.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

This team has amazing potential but I fear we will see none of the fast attacking incisive football that Liverpool for instance are playing, more sideways / back passing and slowing the game to monotony is on the cards!

How can someone just blame one player today, the team was woeful, esp the defence, not just because of the goals but the extremely slow side to side passing by the two centre backs, frustrating the attacking players

The difference between the pairings without Ramsey is that none of them does 360 degree turns and slow down our attacking or counter attacking play and they pass the ball quicker.

The introduction of Giroud slowed down the attack & for sure Arsenal would not have scored three had he started ahead of either Walcott, Iwobi or Alexis as pace in the attacking third is what split Chelsea.

obviously not... he has his moments no doubt but is too slow to anticipate efforts of our attacking midfield and does nt hassle intimidate and threaten defences enough... do nt think he would be at arsenal if he wasnt coming from ligue 1

They say attack is the best form of defence and Arsenal are trying to get in the Newcastle half, and Wenger slows it down on the 88th minute by bringing on Coquelin for Alexis.