Severity
of socioeconomic deprivation was included as a moderator in these associations.
Excepting stronger indications of academic test scores for general health and mental well - being for the earlier 1958 birth cohort, and
of socioeconomic deprivation for the general health of women, differential associations of the childhood measures with adult health are not apparent by gender, or between the 1958 and 1970 birth cohorts.
Not exact matches
We used the SEIFA Index
of Relative Social
Deprivation (IRSD) which takes into account factors from a range
socioeconomic measures including income and education [22].
Bed sharing mortality has been linked with markers
of lower
socioeconomic status (SES), including overcrowded households, adolescent mothers, economic
deprivation, and low levels
of maternal education (e.g., Carpenter et al 2004; Fleming 2006; Ostfeld et al 2006).
Trends in the incidence and mortality
of multiple births by
socioeconomic deprivation and maternal age in England: population - based cohort study
Allocation was concealed and performed after application
of the prebirth exclusion criteria, stratified by
socioeconomic status with use
of the New Zealand
Deprivation Index 2006.
«One in four patients develop heart failure within four years
of first heart attack: Risk factors include older age,
socioeconomic deprivation, and diabetes.»
One in four patients develop heart failure within four years
of a first heart attack, according to a study in nearly 25,000 patients presented today at Heart Failure 2016 and the 3rd World Congress on Acute Heart Failure by Dr Johannes Gho, a cardiology resident at the University Medical Center Utrecht, in Utrecht, the Netherlands.1 Risk factors included older age, greater
socioeconomic deprivation, and comorbidities such as diabetes.
Five measures
of socioeconomic status were assessed: age completing full time education, degree level education, job class, annual household income, and Townsend
deprivation index (a recognised social
deprivation score).
«These data support evidence that height and BMI play an important partial role in determining several aspects
of a person's
socioeconomic status, especially women's BMI for income and
deprivation and men's height for education, income, and job class,» they write.
Hospital admission rates are 55 per cent higher in some areas than in others because
of a greater prevalence
of conditions such as diabetes, alcoholism, dementia and
socioeconomic deprivation.
Association between
socioeconomic deprivation and general health was apparent at the level
of some
deprivation for women; however, association was not apparent for men at this level (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001 for interaction in the individual and full models respectively).
It incorporates key measures
of childhood background — including
socioeconomic deprivation, family disruption, housing tenure and parental interest in the child's education — and powerful measures
of developmental problems for the child — including low birth weight, health difficulties, low cognitive performance and behavioural difficulties.
Childhood
socioeconomic deprivation, family housing tenure other than consistent home ownership, family disruption, lack
of parental interest, behaviour problems, low academic test scores and health difficulties were each clearly associated with poor mental well - being in adulthood when estimated by analysing each childhood measure individually, adjusting for cohort and gender, and in the full model considering all childhood measures, although they were to some extent attenuated.
This study provides evidence that a diversity
of family background (
socioeconomic deprivation, housing tenure, family disruption and parental interest), health and development (cognition and behaviour) measures gives powerful independent childhood indications for general health and mental well - being in early adulthood, whereas limiting long - standing illness in adulthood is most strongly indicated by health difficulties in childhood.
The primary goal
of this study is to integrate measures
of childhood family disadvantage —
socioeconomic deprivation, family disruption, housing tenure and parental interest in education — and measures
of child development — birth weight, health, cognition and behaviour — such that the relative indications
of each net
of the others may be explored.
Strong gradients
of association between childhood
socioeconomic conditions and adult health have been consistently observed in a number
of British, and other, populations at various stages within their life course, with outcomes considered including all - cause mortality, general health measures and specific causes
of mortality and morbidity.1 — 10 This study continues to provide clear evidence for association between childhood
socioeconomic deprivation and adult general health and mental well - being, even considered within a broad context
of child well - being including other aspects
of family background, health and development.
Interaction between gender and childhood
socioeconomic deprivation described an increasingly detrimental indication
of general health for women compared with men.
As an indicator
of socioeconomic status, Index
of Multiple
Deprivation (IMD) scores, based on the English Indices of Deprivation, 47 were assigned to each child based on their reported home postcode, where higher scores indicate greater levels of d
Deprivation (IMD) scores, based on the English Indices
of Deprivation, 47 were assigned to each child based on their reported home postcode, where higher scores indicate greater levels of d
Deprivation, 47 were assigned to each child based on their reported home postcode, where higher scores indicate greater levels
of deprivationdeprivation.
Evidence that group parenting programmes can change parenting practices and is cost - effective in treating conduct disorder and child behaviour problems is strong.17, 18 There is also good evidence that they are effective in preventing behavioural problems in high - risk groups identified by
socioeconomic deprivation, ethnic group and experience
of life events.19 — 22 Although many parenting programmes have been developed and evaluated, 23, 24 most
of this evidence is related to two programmes: the Incredible Years Programme25, 26 and Triple P. 27, 28
Combination
of stressful family
socioeconomic factors (poverty, severe
deprivation, marital breakup, single parenting, unemployment, loss
of support from extended family)
Exposure: Area - level
socioeconomic disadvantage (e.g. Index
of Multiple
Deprivation, Carstairs - Morris, Townsend scores).
They suggest that the spillover
of negative parental functioning into parent — child interactions is particularly likely under conditions
of substantial
socioeconomic deprivation.
These findings extend prior research on the processes through which
socioeconomic deprivation severity and family functioning impact maternal harsh discipline within a high - risk sample
of low - income families.