Many clients don't really want the litigation process but they don't know there are alternative ways
of solving their legal problems.
Sam Glover: Yeah, and I guess something that maybe I hadn't really fully appreciated before I started reading your study was the process of, well, the process
of solving legal problems from the client perspective is just stress, top to bottom, side to side, front to back.
One of the really important things you do as a criminal defense lawyer is just the simple act of saying, I see you as a human being, I'm on your side, you're not just a «defendant» to me.That can be a big part
of solving the legal problems, too.
The costs
of solving legal problems are not solely the costs of legal representation and court proceedings.
Significant among them are the high cost
of solving legal problems, in particular the high cost of legal representation, the complexity of the law and legal procedures and the negative attitudes of those in the legal system.
Entrepreneurs, non-profit groups, legal aid agencies, and courts are developing legal software applications to serve consumers directly as a alternative way
of solving their legal problems at low cost.
«Scott went from a daily regimen of applied science to one
of solving legal problems for the same industry,» Hull continued.
«Instead
of solving a legal problem and often seeing the client continue in the situation that gave rise to the problem, a holistic approach holds the promise of a more fundamental and permanent change in circumstances.»
According to Associate Dean and Professor Mark McKenna, an expert on intellectual property law who is a driving force behind the Law School's Program of Study in Intellectual Property and Technology law, «This is a welcome, forward - looking course that is dedicated to readying our grads for the new reality of legal practice in the 21st century, a time in which more law firm and corporate employers are seeking to hire attorneys who are familiar with technology and are able to find creative, non-traditional, cost - effective ways
of solving legal problems.»
This is because law firms are not in the business
of solving legal problems; they are in the business of billing hours devoted to solving legal problems.
Not exact matches
Sure — it might mean spending a little bit
of extra money to consult a lawyer but, if Delta's
legal department has taught us anything, it's that it is always better to
solve a
problem before it morphs into a lawsuit.
He's also a sought - after speaker and the founder and resident
legal guru
of The Law Firm For Businesses, a boutique law firm that helps business owners creatively
solve their business and
legal problems.
But as people with experience
solving complex
problems, leading complex organizations and coping with regulatory and
legal issues, they have a valid and vital perspective to express on matters
of politics and public policy.
Where appropriate, he invites clients to take a step back from the
legal issues in front
of them and invites them to ask themselves better questions by using the Osborne - Parnes Creative
Problem Solving methodology.
«Were we to separate
legal and sacramental marriage, it would
solve all sorts
of problems, not the least
of which is the growing discomfort that many
of us have that
legal marriage is available only to some responsible adults who are in monogamous relationships.»
The church can
solve this
problem by a «render unto Caesar» approach by relinquishing the
legal role that the state has lumbered it with, and gets back to the basics
of celebrating who God puts together — which, as stated in the previous verse, was between a man and woman instinct-wise.
«The Jehovah's Witnesses,» Supreme Court Justice Harlan Stone once famously said, «ought to have an endowment in view
of the aid which they give in
solving the
legal problems of civil liberties.»
«Legislating is about
problem solving, and I believe it is a significant
problem that New York State has no mandatory reporting law for parents,
legal guardians, caretakers or other responsible adults to not notify law enforcement
of the death
of their child, accidental or otherwise, within atimely manner
of the death being discovered.»
And the administration hopes to have
solved the multimillion - dollar
problem of commercial tax refunds by that point — though many expect
legal challenges to stall that deal.
And while the de Blasio administration has increased funding for free
legal services for tenants, lawyers working with low - income New Yorkers say that isn't
solving the
problem, citing the arsenal
of strategies landlords can use to evict rent - stabilized tenants since they can increase rents up to 20 percent — without making any renovations — when units are vacant.
Adequacy tied to standards
solves the
legal and political
problems of justiciability.
But is it within the competence (not to mention the
legal authority)
of the federal government to
solve those
problems, or will their efforts to do so simply make things worse for educators, school leaders, and policymakers in the places that really matter?
Among sales and marketing professionals in residential real estate, the broad range
of Faculty expertise, from
legal to ethical to regulatory to electrical, lends itself to efficient arms - length
problem solving, even when schedules are exceptionally tight.
However, the sound advice and deft
legal drafting skills
of an experienced real estate attorney may pay for themselves several times over by
solving problems before they ever arise.
Two decades
of debate over assigning blame for emissions,
legal responsibility for reducing them and allocating per capita rights to use the atmosphere for disposing
of heat trapping gases have created a zero - sum game without opportunities for
solving problems by creating mutual gains.
Therefore the
problem of unaffordable
legal services can not be
solved without government intervention.
However, doesn't that make it even more important to walk in the shoes
of a variety
of members
of the public, for example, who are trying
solve their
legal problems?
Maybe this low percentage is the root cause
of the
legal tech industry's obsession with
solving all the wrong
problems, or maybe 9 % is a typical percentage
of ex-professionals to have on staff for companies trying to provide tech solutions to that industry.
And therefore devices such as the following are used by law societies: (1) methods to control an alleged over-supply
of lawyers; (2) «alternative
legal services,» which are charity, simplistic services, and without the benefit
of the solicitor - client relationship (pro bono services being but a very small exception, and possibly targeted
legal services); and, (3) the sponsoring
of «apps,» (the application
of electronic technology to
legal services), the effect
of which upon the
problem is unknown and unanalyzed, and can not
solve any such access to justice
problem.
This is a
problem that should be
solved: it is in the interests
of all members
of the
legal community who write regularly to have access to these time saving software packages, as this is a place where immediate efficiency improvements could be made with little expense or change in work style.
Few
legal project
problems can be
solved in a couple
of days.
«The Technology
of Centralized
Legal Research Can
Solve the Unaffordable
Legal Services
Problem»;
Malcolm your favorite solution, alternate business structures (ABSs), they can not
solve the unaffordable
legal services
problem because they propose no change in the method
of producing
legal services.
A recent report by the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, chaired by Supreme Court
of Canada Justice Thomas A. Cromwell, stated nearly 12 million Canadians will experience at least one
legal problem in a three - year period, and few will have the resources to
solve them.
No matter how you bill, what types
of legal problems solve, or what types
of clients you serve, Clio can be used to fit your workflow.
Therefore, the
problem and its long history
of failure, requires government intervention, because law societies, being the regulators
of the
legal profession in Canada, do not realize that they do not understand the true nature
of the
problem and won't accept the fact that they and all other such institutions within the
legal profession do not have the expertise necessary to
solve the
problem.
While it could be argued that wholesale distribution
of law will create more retail (free or low cost)
legal information distribution points and thus increase access to justice — indeed, it would
solve many
of the closed
problems of legal information that I listed above — I'm now not entirely convinced that this is the only way to go for state government publication efforts.
In each
of the last 12 months, the ABA Journal has checked in with a group
of legal professionals who have pioneered the use
of technology for
problem -
solving, research and innovation, among other traits.
Support services methods
of production are essential to
solving the «unaffordable
legal services
problem.»
«Mindfulness can help us become more aware
of each other and our communication deficiencies across the firm so that we work to improve and integrate our
problem -
solving, responsiveness and interpersonal skills with our
legal skills.
Evidently, leaving the balancing to national courts would not
solve the
problem of divergent judgments in individual cases, which would again adversely affect
legal certainty and equal treatment.
But because ABSs would not change the method whereby the work is done to produce
legal services, they have no capacity to
solve or reduce the
problem of unaffordable
legal services.
(A
problem that could easily be
solved for
legal proceedings by amending subsections such as, s. 31.5 CEA and s. 34.1 (8) OEA, and s. 41.6
of the Alberta Evidence Act (AEA), to state that «systems integrity» can be established by proof
of compliance with 72.34.)
For further details see (pdf downloads): (1) «Access to Justice — Unaffordable
Legal Services» Concepts and Solutions»; (2) «The Technology
of Centralized
Legal Research Can
Solve the Unaffordable
Legal Services
Problem»; (3) «Access to Justice — Canada's Unaffordable
Legal Services — CanLII as the Necessary Support Service»; (4) «A2J: Preventing the Abolition
of Law Societies by Curing the Defects in their Management Structure: A Solution to the Unaffordable
Legal Services
Problem»; (5) «A2J: «Let Them Eat Cake,» So Let Them Use Alternative
Legal Services»; (6) Indexing; (7) Sometimes Laws are Too Important to be Left to Lawyers — Lawyers Without Technical Support,» (Slaw January 28, 2016), and other access to justice (A2J) articles on my SSRN author's page, and Slaw author's page.
So why does the majority
of LSUC's membership tolerate such preference given to the interests
of benchers
of law firms that serve large institutions and potential investors and not to
solving the unaffordable
legal services
problems of middle and lower income people?
Right now, they have nothing
of that nature — no program the purpose
of which is to
solve the
problem of unaffordable
legal services.
Law society neglect
of the
problem, which is in law, its duty to
solve, has created a large permanent class within society that can not obtain affordable
legal services.
Given: (1) the misery and damage caused to the majority
of the population by the
problem; and, (2) the law societies» refusal to try to
solve the
problem, the commercial producers have a strong argument that they should be treated as equal to the ABSs in providing relief from the consequences
of the law societies» breach
of trust, i.e., their failure to perform the duties attendant to their monopoly over the provision
of legal services.
But that
problem can not be
solved by turning ownership
of the
legal profession over to investment houses.
(1) management by part - time amateurs (benchers), whose work is mostly charity — «amateurs» because they don't have the expertise necessary for
solving difficult
problems such as the unaffordability
of legal services (and they don't try to get it);