The movie is a pretty straightforward affair
of something supernatural haunting college students, forcing them to do terrible, violent things to each other.
You must provide verifiable evidence
of something supernatural before you can insert as a viable possibility.
Please provide verifiable evidence
of something supernatural.
Lots of people choose to believe some random event is a sign
of something supernatural.
Not exact matches
00:00 Introduction 07:07 Limits
of Science 19:40 God & the
Supernatural 31:20 Science & Morality 50:11
Something out
of Nothing 1:03:42 The Value
of Philosophy 1:20:59 Cognitive Limits 1:35:43 Questions: — 1:35:56 Science & Politics — 1:43:33 The Status
of Economics — 1:48:17 Does Consciousness Exist?
a thing done or
something that has actual existance; evidence...
something that furnishes proof; proof...
something that enduces certainty or establishes validity;
supernatural...
of or relating to an order beyond the visible order
of the universe.
Meaning «
supernatural being» is attested from c. 1300 (see ghost); that
of «essential principle
of something» (in a non-theological sense, e.g. Spirit
of St. Louis) is attested from 1690, common after 1800.
Once it has been established that claims
something is the work
of supernatural forces can be and have been wrong, then all such claims become suspect, especially since no such claims have ever be proven to be correct.
If it makes any claim that involves spirits, demons, or other
supernatural forces it's an example
of someone who believes in
supernatural forces wrongly claiming with no evidence that they are responsible for
something they aren't.
It's still an example
of people wrongly attributing
something to
supernatural forces.
A «group
of drunks» that atheists talk about has nothing to do with the concept
of a
supernatural being intervening in your life being regarded as
something other than atheism.
it should though when you experience
something that is without a doubt
supernatural, and anyone with intelligence can understand that a revelation or a message that takes a sovereign «person» to translate
something in the near, or distant future, it is PROOF,
of God, just is the bible is proof
of God, as it is His very Word through the direct revelation to the prophets.
this appears to be your line
of thought... so think it out... why do so many people on the planet believe in
something supernatural?
You seem to think that «faster than the speed
of light» is
something outside
of known physics that needs a
supernatural explanation.
If the person you are talking about was observed to be chewing someone's face off while levitating, then you would have
something that looked to be the work
of supernatural evil powers.
But there are others for whom evil is no mere relation
of the subject to particular outer things, but
something more radical and general, a wrongness or vice in his essential nature, which no alteration
of the environment, or any superficial rearrangement
of the inner self, can cure, and which requires a
supernatural remedy.
The happiness that comes, when any does come — and often enough it fails to return in an acute form, though its form is sometimes very acute — is not the simple ignorance
of ill, but
something vastly more complex, including natural evil as one
of its elements, but finding natural evil no such stumbling - block and terror because it now sees it swallowed up in
supernatural good.
The communication to created nature
of what we call the «
supernatural» is not
something extraneous, therefore, it is the communication
of the supreme order
of being, by which we mean sheer reality.
Bless them for their patience, for their
supernatural ability to stop rolling - their - eyes, for their ability to be present instead
of checking out for
something more fun.
For those who are Christians, this union can not fully take place with someone outside
of relationship with Jesus Christ, because true «oneness» is
something that can not be forced or synthesized: it's
supernatural.
Hitherto, also, the «
supernatural» gift
of ourselves which we were required to make to God and to our neighbor appeared to be
something opposed to and destructive
of the bonds
of feeling attaching us to the things
of this world.
But his real history is much longer and much more extraordinary than could be indicated by these flares
of war; it is a history that runs back three centuries into primitive America, a strange and unfathomable history that is touched by
something dark and
supernatural, and that goes back through poverty and hardship, through solitude and loneliness and death and unspeakable courage, into the wilderness.»
Let me take this one step further... let's tax religious organizations (basically
supernatural unproven nonsense) and give it to science for the betterment
of mankind,
something that is tangible and not
supernatural.
As a Pagan, I don't believe in the «
supernatural» either, because that implies that
something exists outside
of nature.
Genuine faith... is granted by God... faith is a
supernatural gift
of God... faith is not
something that is conjured up by the human will but is a sovereignly granted gift (cf. Php 1:29)(MacArthur, The Gospel According to Jesus, 172 - 173).
Okay, what is natural to Man is contrasted with that which is
supernatural, i.e.
something that goes beyond the claims
of our nature.
But they don't get tired
of it... they had one magical experience with
something supernatural, and they come back for more.
It is not
something already present because
of having been inaugurated by Jesus in his own person as the Messiah.24 It is the
supernatural, superhistorical gift
of God to him who responds affirmatively to God in the ultimate — even eschatological decision
of his own existence.
If, whenever personal will steps in to do
something that nature by itself would not do, we call that
supernatural, we obviously can not get supernaturalism out
of religion, because we can not get it out
of life.
What you should be careful
of is thinking that there was
something «
supernatural» (whatever that may mean, you might as well use the term «superdupernatural» for how silly these discussions get) going on here.
Just because you don't know God is showing you
something supernatural and you don't know its because
of him doesn't mean it's not.
Since that
supernatural manifestation
of God in our life is so difficult to put into «7 steps toward Godliness» we resort to
something that sells and is «teachable.»
I can think
of maybe one or two times in my life when I have felt a strong, perhaps
supernatural, pull toward
something... but even then, I did not announce it to be God's will, mainly because I am distrustful
of my own motives and I want to remain open to input from others.
In other words, running side by side we have the sea as
something evil and
something good, and the monster as a
supernatural evil being, a symbol
of anti-God forces, and a magnificent testimony to God's wisdom and power.
This may sound absurd to someone who grew up assuming their was ample evidence for the
supernatural claims covered in the Gospels, but without ample evidence, involving another deity — especially one that was likely used to scare people into believing (and for the sake
of explaining why
something didn't seem right in historical sequence), is pretty fishy.
I have had an epiphany and a waking to reality that the mere thought
of something so
supernatural without as one tiny bit
of proof is just plain insane.
While it is true that Rahner's presentation
of man as a «
supernatural existential» does aim to maintain some kind
of nature
of man such that it can not be absolutely identical with his
supernatural vocation, the texts quoted above appear to indicate that the
supernatural life that is given to the believer is
something already possessed by the non-believer in equal measure.
Something of the «
supernatural thickness»
of medieval romance reappeared in the spooky Gothic novels
of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, but there was no going back.
Science deals with natural (not
supernatural) causes and, as such, has several ways
of exploring where the «
something» came from.
Rather than saying that
something like the human eye is too complicated to understand, so a
supernatural intrusion must have enabled it, we are saying that it is possible because
of a scientific theory that has been under development for 150 years and has been reinforced by the fossil record and now by the molecular record.
The young wizards
of Hogwarts will need
something much more effective than Umbridge's Ministry - approved course in defensive magic if they are to truly succeed in the extraordinary battle that lies ahead, however, and when the administration fails to provide the students with the tools that they will need to defend Hogwarts against the fearsome powers
of the Dark Arts, Hermione (Emma Watson), Ron (Rupert Grint), and Harry take it upon themselves to recruit a small group
of students to form «Dumbledore's Army» in preparation for the ultimate
supernatural showdown.
The first offered a series
of supernatural eruptions followed by hints
of traditional closure and satisfaction, to the extent that series creators Lynch and Mark Frost were able to provide such things — but from the 30 - minute mark onward there were signs that, beneath the veneer
of order - from - disorder,
something else was afoot.
An effective genre film that leaves an unmistakably good impression, which is
something most
of Hollywood's
supernatural thrillers usually fail to do.
The beauty
of VanderMeer's books is that the whys and wherefores
of Area X are not important — it could be alien,
supernatural, spiritual, or
something more unimaginable — because it is what happens within the space that matters.
It's more like a
supernatural drama / thriller that dabbles with the question
of the afterlife, or, at least, the depiction
of it that we have gleaned from those who've had a near - death experience that have commonly reported experiencing
something beyond the mundane before they were brought back to life.
Aquaman will also feature a strikingly different world from that
of other superhero films -
something that also extends to other upcoming superhero movies, such as Marvel Studios» Doctor Strange (which dabbles in
supernatural horror) or even 20th Century Fox's Wolverine 3 (an R - Rated film with a modern - western vibe).
Few filmmakers are capable
of imagining anything worse than
supernatural horror or overly conventional heartbreak and Silver ends up creating
something in between those worlds.
Horror fan will have
something to look forward to with The Conjuring 2 giving us the next terrifying account
of the
supernatural, straight from the files
of real life paranormal investigators Ed & Lorraine Warren.
Hooper's film still works as a product
of its era, but the premise
of an overly generic white suburban family haunted by
supernatural spirits in a PG - 13 throwdown isn't
something that translates well to the modern age.
A handsome throwback to the golden age
of British horror anthologies, the
supernatural thriller «Ghost Stories» transforms a hit play into
something surprisingly cinematic.