Sentences with phrase «of something supernatural»

The movie is a pretty straightforward affair of something supernatural haunting college students, forcing them to do terrible, violent things to each other.
You must provide verifiable evidence of something supernatural before you can insert as a viable possibility.
Please provide verifiable evidence of something supernatural.
Lots of people choose to believe some random event is a sign of something supernatural.

Not exact matches

00:00 Introduction 07:07 Limits of Science 19:40 God & the Supernatural 31:20 Science & Morality 50:11 Something out of Nothing 1:03:42 The Value of Philosophy 1:20:59 Cognitive Limits 1:35:43 Questions: — 1:35:56 Science & Politics — 1:43:33 The Status of Economics — 1:48:17 Does Consciousness Exist?
a thing done or something that has actual existance; evidence... something that furnishes proof; proof... something that enduces certainty or establishes validity; supernatural... of or relating to an order beyond the visible order of the universe.
Meaning «supernatural being» is attested from c. 1300 (see ghost); that of «essential principle of something» (in a non-theological sense, e.g. Spirit of St. Louis) is attested from 1690, common after 1800.
Once it has been established that claims something is the work of supernatural forces can be and have been wrong, then all such claims become suspect, especially since no such claims have ever be proven to be correct.
If it makes any claim that involves spirits, demons, or other supernatural forces it's an example of someone who believes in supernatural forces wrongly claiming with no evidence that they are responsible for something they aren't.
It's still an example of people wrongly attributing something to supernatural forces.
A «group of drunks» that atheists talk about has nothing to do with the concept of a supernatural being intervening in your life being regarded as something other than atheism.
it should though when you experience something that is without a doubt supernatural, and anyone with intelligence can understand that a revelation or a message that takes a sovereign «person» to translate something in the near, or distant future, it is PROOF, of God, just is the bible is proof of God, as it is His very Word through the direct revelation to the prophets.
this appears to be your line of thought... so think it out... why do so many people on the planet believe in something supernatural?
You seem to think that «faster than the speed of light» is something outside of known physics that needs a supernatural explanation.
If the person you are talking about was observed to be chewing someone's face off while levitating, then you would have something that looked to be the work of supernatural evil powers.
But there are others for whom evil is no mere relation of the subject to particular outer things, but something more radical and general, a wrongness or vice in his essential nature, which no alteration of the environment, or any superficial rearrangement of the inner self, can cure, and which requires a supernatural remedy.
The happiness that comes, when any does come — and often enough it fails to return in an acute form, though its form is sometimes very acute — is not the simple ignorance of ill, but something vastly more complex, including natural evil as one of its elements, but finding natural evil no such stumbling - block and terror because it now sees it swallowed up in supernatural good.
The communication to created nature of what we call the «supernatural» is not something extraneous, therefore, it is the communication of the supreme order of being, by which we mean sheer reality.
Bless them for their patience, for their supernatural ability to stop rolling - their - eyes, for their ability to be present instead of checking out for something more fun.
For those who are Christians, this union can not fully take place with someone outside of relationship with Jesus Christ, because true «oneness» is something that can not be forced or synthesized: it's supernatural.
Hitherto, also, the «supernatural» gift of ourselves which we were required to make to God and to our neighbor appeared to be something opposed to and destructive of the bonds of feeling attaching us to the things of this world.
But his real history is much longer and much more extraordinary than could be indicated by these flares of war; it is a history that runs back three centuries into primitive America, a strange and unfathomable history that is touched by something dark and supernatural, and that goes back through poverty and hardship, through solitude and loneliness and death and unspeakable courage, into the wilderness.»
Let me take this one step further... let's tax religious organizations (basically supernatural unproven nonsense) and give it to science for the betterment of mankind, something that is tangible and not supernatural.
As a Pagan, I don't believe in the «supernatural» either, because that implies that something exists outside of nature.
Genuine faith... is granted by God... faith is a supernatural gift of God... faith is not something that is conjured up by the human will but is a sovereignly granted gift (cf. Php 1:29)(MacArthur, The Gospel According to Jesus, 172 - 173).
Okay, what is natural to Man is contrasted with that which is supernatural, i.e. something that goes beyond the claims of our nature.
But they don't get tired of it... they had one magical experience with something supernatural, and they come back for more.
It is not something already present because of having been inaugurated by Jesus in his own person as the Messiah.24 It is the supernatural, superhistorical gift of God to him who responds affirmatively to God in the ultimate — even eschatological decision of his own existence.
If, whenever personal will steps in to do something that nature by itself would not do, we call that supernatural, we obviously can not get supernaturalism out of religion, because we can not get it out of life.
What you should be careful of is thinking that there was something «supernatural» (whatever that may mean, you might as well use the term «superdupernatural» for how silly these discussions get) going on here.
Just because you don't know God is showing you something supernatural and you don't know its because of him doesn't mean it's not.
Since that supernatural manifestation of God in our life is so difficult to put into «7 steps toward Godliness» we resort to something that sells and is «teachable.»
I can think of maybe one or two times in my life when I have felt a strong, perhaps supernatural, pull toward something... but even then, I did not announce it to be God's will, mainly because I am distrustful of my own motives and I want to remain open to input from others.
In other words, running side by side we have the sea as something evil and something good, and the monster as a supernatural evil being, a symbol of anti-God forces, and a magnificent testimony to God's wisdom and power.
This may sound absurd to someone who grew up assuming their was ample evidence for the supernatural claims covered in the Gospels, but without ample evidence, involving another deity — especially one that was likely used to scare people into believing (and for the sake of explaining why something didn't seem right in historical sequence), is pretty fishy.
I have had an epiphany and a waking to reality that the mere thought of something so supernatural without as one tiny bit of proof is just plain insane.
While it is true that Rahner's presentation of man as a «supernatural existential» does aim to maintain some kind of nature of man such that it can not be absolutely identical with his supernatural vocation, the texts quoted above appear to indicate that the supernatural life that is given to the believer is something already possessed by the non-believer in equal measure.
Something of the «supernatural thickness» of medieval romance reappeared in the spooky Gothic novels of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, but there was no going back.
Science deals with natural (not supernatural) causes and, as such, has several ways of exploring where the «something» came from.
Rather than saying that something like the human eye is too complicated to understand, so a supernatural intrusion must have enabled it, we are saying that it is possible because of a scientific theory that has been under development for 150 years and has been reinforced by the fossil record and now by the molecular record.
The young wizards of Hogwarts will need something much more effective than Umbridge's Ministry - approved course in defensive magic if they are to truly succeed in the extraordinary battle that lies ahead, however, and when the administration fails to provide the students with the tools that they will need to defend Hogwarts against the fearsome powers of the Dark Arts, Hermione (Emma Watson), Ron (Rupert Grint), and Harry take it upon themselves to recruit a small group of students to form «Dumbledore's Army» in preparation for the ultimate supernatural showdown.
The first offered a series of supernatural eruptions followed by hints of traditional closure and satisfaction, to the extent that series creators Lynch and Mark Frost were able to provide such things — but from the 30 - minute mark onward there were signs that, beneath the veneer of order - from - disorder, something else was afoot.
An effective genre film that leaves an unmistakably good impression, which is something most of Hollywood's supernatural thrillers usually fail to do.
The beauty of VanderMeer's books is that the whys and wherefores of Area X are not important — it could be alien, supernatural, spiritual, or something more unimaginable — because it is what happens within the space that matters.
It's more like a supernatural drama / thriller that dabbles with the question of the afterlife, or, at least, the depiction of it that we have gleaned from those who've had a near - death experience that have commonly reported experiencing something beyond the mundane before they were brought back to life.
Aquaman will also feature a strikingly different world from that of other superhero films - something that also extends to other upcoming superhero movies, such as Marvel Studios» Doctor Strange (which dabbles in supernatural horror) or even 20th Century Fox's Wolverine 3 (an R - Rated film with a modern - western vibe).
Few filmmakers are capable of imagining anything worse than supernatural horror or overly conventional heartbreak and Silver ends up creating something in between those worlds.
Horror fan will have something to look forward to with The Conjuring 2 giving us the next terrifying account of the supernatural, straight from the files of real life paranormal investigators Ed & Lorraine Warren.
Hooper's film still works as a product of its era, but the premise of an overly generic white suburban family haunted by supernatural spirits in a PG - 13 throwdown isn't something that translates well to the modern age.
A handsome throwback to the golden age of British horror anthologies, the supernatural thriller «Ghost Stories» transforms a hit play into something surprisingly cinematic.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z