Sentences with phrase «of speak to anyone»

Especially the wanting to just stare at the wall instead of speak to anyone!

It was the speech of someone who either doesn't care or isn't capable of speaking to anyone outside of his immediate supporters.

This method consisted of speaking to anyone he could to gain more information on the company.

Not exact matches

Everything that could have been said has already been spoken in hundreds or even thousands of different iterations, so why should anyone listen to you?

Anyone doing business overseas has to figure out just how far to go in ensuring the legality (broadly speaking) of various aspects of their business.

Watch House of Cards (speaking of creeps...) or any old episode of Behind the Music, and the story about power you'll see is simple: a nice, ambitious person, once they can do whatever they want, is quickly transformed into a monster of appetite, running over anyone necessary to satisfy their newly created desires.

Before the evening of November 8, when Wolf Blitzer, Rachel Maddow, and Megyn Kelly identify who our next president will be, it behooves anyone wearing the mantel of «reporter» or «political analyst» to make themselves worthy of that identification by rolling up their sleeves, picking up the phone, and reaching out to voters who can and will speak truth to power.

In fact, in small layoffs, it's the whistleblowers who spoke up (inconveniently) or anyone who made one of their bosses (or their egos) uncomfortable who are often the first to go.

When Virgin Trains was putting its emergency procedures in place, we had analyzed a number of serious rail incidents, and had been appalled by the length of time that usually passed before anyone in charge started speaking to the press.

Then we take it one step further: Before we ever speak to anyone, we already have an idea of a good answer, an OK answer, and a «pause answer» for any question we ask.

Last year there was a string of serial rapes and we are speaking with some of the local advocacy groups and developing a plan to keep the space open and staffed Friday and Saturday nights until an hour after the bars close so that if there is anyone feeling uncomfortable or threatened by a situation can come and use the space as a safe haven and have the option of being walked home at the end of the evening.

It's of critical importance to speak personally to anyone who worked closely with the departing executive.

Or, it could be that anyone with half a brain would realize you're going to be more successful if you speak idiomatic English, so they must just be clueless if they haven't gotten rid of their strong accent.

«I'd like to set the record straight: Neither I nor anyone in my office has spoken with the president or any high - level member of the Trump administration, including Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, regarding government business since August.»

The name Warren Buffett conjures up images of brilliant investment plans and more wealth than anyone could possibly imagine (and, possibly, the idea of just a hint of clairvoyance), but it also speaks of a man of humble origins who combined a natural - born gift with hard work and put both to good use.

A responsible United States Congress would investigate these matters, and it speaks volumes about how invested the current Republican majority is in turning a blind eye to such a broad range of Trumpian misconduct that it doesn't even occur to anyone to wonder whether investigations will happen.

See and speak to anyone at your door with live video and two way audio, or be notified of lurkers with instant - on motion - activated alerts right to your smartphone.

Anyone who has had to speak in public, whether in a class or a board room, is probably familiar with that feeling of dread leading up to the presentation.

While I'm sympathetic to anyone who dislikes the current tax rates, and I think it is unfortunate that dividends are taxed at all since they are already taxed 35 % or so at the corporate level, but realistically speaking, the current 15 % tax structure (for most of us) is about as good as we can ask for.

He says, «Nobody learned anything by hearing themselves talk, or speak,» and he goes on to say, «The ability to lock in and listen is a skill that has served me well in life,» says Branson, «Although, it seems to be a dying art, I believe that listening is one of the most important skills for any teacher, parent, leader, entrepreneur, or just about anyone who has a pulse.»

«Communications guru Gallo draws on the power of TED talks to reveal the secrets of effective public speaking... The result is a dynamic work focused on storytelling... sure to be a hit with anyone who wants to be a successful communicator.»

These are the presentations that set the world on fire, and the techniques that top TED speakers use are the same ones that will make any presentation more dynamic, fire up any team, and give anyone the confidence to overcome their fear of public speaking.

I have fortunately gotten offers to work at a startup and in several different contexts similar to my previous position — and these are things I would potentially enjoy, yes, but to waste the potential equity that «personal brand», dirty as it may sound, creates for me (or anyone else) to leverage into client work that pays well and speaking gigs that open up other opportunities — would be a true «lighting on fire» of that which I had done to build that before quitting.

They do not speak on behalf of «God» nor are they or their message anymore real than anyone will allow it to be.

«in a language other than Spanish»???? Has it ever occured to anyone that there are hundreds of other languages out there and just because someone speaks one (or more) of them does not make them a threat to you.

There is no more evidence that any «LORD» spoke to them and «anointed» anyone as king than that he spoke to the Duke of Windsor to abdicate so that eventually Queen Elizabeth would be «anointed» as the British monarch.

A big magic fairy man spoke a spell and then there was earth and light before stars and then a snake talked to a woman and then the big magic fairy man had to sacrifice himself to himself to appease himself by exploiting a loophole in a plan he made himself because of an invisible disease (sin) in an invisble body part (soul) so that he doesn't have to torture us forever in the big fire pit he made even though he doesn't want anyone to ever go there but he just can't help himself.

People like Santorum remind me of the Pharasees who were careful to show up in the temple full of pride and self righteous indignation for anyone who dared to question their rigid ideology yet never took one step towards bettering conditions in their society or spoke out against social and economic injustice.

There was not mention of «forcing» anyone to speak to the chaplain.

Today, with much of the discourse on drug addiction controlled by medical bureaucrats, it is common to speak of addiction as an «equal - opportunity disease» that can «strike anyone.»

Liberals indulge in periodic public rhetorical displays of «So - to - Speak» support for the Constitution, and they like well - told history or biography about the Founders as well as anyone, but they aren't as interested in treating them as a guide.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

They refused to let anyone from outside the community speak, and when one village trustee questioned whether the economic claims of gambling included the costs of gambling, she was quickly silenced by the mayor.

A fine of up to 25,000 euros can be handed to anyone found under Irish law to have published or spoken blasphemous material.

If you were a real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not mean he was saying «I mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me chad.

Christianity itself has become a principality and holds thousands captive, Before anyone comments on me calling todays Christianity a principality, (a demonic stronghold) let me just make a request that those who do answer are those who live as the followers of the way did in biblical times, that is, meeting every day, considering nothing they owned as their own, laying their lives down for the gospel (and not getting paid to do so) and having signs and wonders accompany them when they speak of the Lord.

If anyone desires to His will, he will know concerning the teaching whether it is from God or I speak of my originality.»

There is a sense in which being available to speak for everyone taints one's ability to speak for anyone, particularly the transcendent God of the universe.

Generally speaking, the answers are obvious, so to anyone with a modicum of discernment and common sense, the questions are rhetorical.

I would have my own students pay special attention to the Cappadocians — Basil the Great, Gregory Nazianzen, and Gregory of Nyssa — because, more than anyone else, they engaged their polytheistic rivals on their own terrain by appropriating Neoplatonism (the «Summa» of the Ancients, so to speak) and Christianizing it.

Anyone who has ever incurred the wrath of an old mother hen by threatening her brood can testify to the fact that Jesus was probably speaking like an «over-zealous,» «overprotective» «Jewish» mama here.

Last night, I was weary after yet another day of helping victims of clergy sexual abuse, and watching how the institutional church circles the wagons around abusive pastors and tries to destroy anyone who dares speak truth.

How dare Jesus, or anyone, speak to us in terms of amputations, gnashing worms and unquenchable tires!

[51] The Eucharist is referred to, almost euphemistically, in this way, precisely because the first Christians believed it was so holy, that it was barely to be spoken of to anyone other than believers.

The words from Psalm 118 «Suscipe me, Domine» (receive me, Lord) are sung by those making profession as a monk or nun, and the teaching offered here on the nature of vows speaks to anyone who sees their human journey in terms of vocation.

Her answers to my series of questions were both astonishing and revealing: She confirmed for me that her academic team did not speak to a single patient, medical analyst, associate, or worker of Mother Teresa's before writing their paper against her; nor did they examine how all her finances were spent; nor did they speak with anyone at the Vatican involved with her sainthood cause, or consult the Vatican's medical board which certified the miracle attributed to Blessed Teresa.

I am an avid reader of the sciences and philosophy as well so I believe that with my educational and life's background I can speak intelligently on these subjects but certainly not exhaustively and stand ready to discuss evidence (s) for and against with anyone willing to dialog without rancor or name calling or nastiness.

Jesus also says that anyone who speaks against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but this view about Israel's rejection of Jesus seems to say the opposite, that Jewish people who rejected Jesus by speaking against Him would not be forgiven.

Every religious person walks around with their holy scripture, claiming that their scripture speaks of the truth, but there is no way to validate anyone's claims.

It was to the advantage of the religious leaders and Romans to cover up the resurrection not to mention what happened to anyone that would speak of it Jew or Roman.