Not exact matches
The Department should take more effective action to speed up the process
of converting inadequate schools and should
improve its understanding
of the factors limiting
academy sponsors» capacity to expand, or discouraging new
sponsors from taking on underperforming schools.
Academies which are underachieving will be «required to demonstrate they can
improve significantly, or face the possibility
of being moved to another
sponsor».
The report questioned the
academy model as a viable option for
improving the prospects
of disadvantaged pupils, claiming that evidence does not yet support the Department for Education's claims that
sponsored academies are transforming the performance
of the most disadvantaged pupils and turning around the worst performing schools.
Test results in
sponsored primary
academies improve at more than double the rate
of non-
academies and results for free school meals
improve faster in those schools, the department said.
«We welcome robust oversight
of all schools, but it is also important to recognise that
sponsored academies have been
improving results faster than other schools in some
of the least well - off communities in our country.»
Those that can
improve will be supported to do so by our team
of expert heads, and those that can not will be turned into
academies under the leadership
of our expert school
sponsors - one
of the best ways
of improving underperforming schools.
2015 results show that primary
sponsored academies open for 2 years have
improved their results, on average, by 10 percentage points since opening, more than double the rate
of improvement in local - authority - maintained schools over the last 2 years
Then education secretary Nicky Morgan named five «top performing»
academy sponsors as beneficiaries
of the funding, and tasked them with «
improving performance for pupils in some
of the most challenging and disadvantaged areas
of the country».
Some
of the secondary schools supported by City Challenge programmes subsequently became
sponsored academies, but they did not
improve significantly more than other schools supported by the scheme, the researchers found.
And what has happened to WCAT's share
of the # 5m given out to «top performing»
academy sponsors tasked with «
improving performance for pupils in some
of the most challenging and disadvantaged areas
of the country»?