Sentences with phrase «of subjective data»

Conclusions: This study produced the T - CMDQ with good psychometric properties, presented the first formal validation of the CMDQ and provided useful insights on the cross-cultural adaptation process of a subjective data collection tool which was originally developed in English, into the Turkish language.

Build a rich text of subjective data on the opposing counsel, judge, and on the overwhelming data on fees, hours, and costs

Any data set that only looks at data from after 1970 is guilty of the scientific crime of subjective data selection.

they then go on to explain the occurrence of the subjective data of perception by treating them as instances of law - like regularities of types of objective physical occurrences.

Not exact matches

In this light, purchasing something and then asking for a refund because it didn't meet subjective standards sure seems like an outdated method of buying and selling, given the encroachment of real data.

Although some people complain that credit scores are unfair, turning subjective judgments into a single number, it's a system based on an overwhelming amount of historical data.

Depending on the scope and purpose of the research, happiness is often measured using objective indicators (data on crime, income, civic engagement and health) and subjective methods, such as asking people how frequently they experience positive and negative emotions.

Wallace said there is an ocean of data that creates security and content issues, and that requires the subjective perspective from a human being to decide which pieces of data or content make it to the smaller pool that is widely shared.

Putting this list together was a combination of art (experience + subjective bias) and science (big ass data).

Except as otherwise noted, the Compensation Committee's executive compensation determinations are subjective and the result of the Compensation Committee's business judgment, which is informed by the experiences of the members of the Compensation Committee as well as the input from, and peer group data provided by, the Compensation Committee's independent executive compensation consultant.

It is saved as evidence under the category of «subjective data»

The doctrine of the philosophy of organism is that, however far the sphere of efficient causation be pushed in the determination of components of a concrescence — its data, its emotions, its appreciations, its purposes, its phases of subjective aim — beyond the determination of these components there always remains the final reaction of the self - creative unity of the universe.

«The subjective aim at each phase provides the subjective unity of all the data at that phase; subjective unity at every phase means only that the data are compatible for synthesis, not that they are completely integrated.

The examples given above entail that the subject prehend the past experience in terms of its content or objective data as well as its emotion or subjective form.

To a large extent the new subjective form is a reenactment of subjective forms in the objective datum, so that there is a flow of feeling from the objective side to the subjective side of each entity.

The judging subject feels the appropriateness, or inappropriateness, vis - a-vis its subjective aim, of a proposed qualification of its datum.

But the «subjective forms [«of the total objective datum»] are merely contributions to the one fact which is the subjective feeling of the one occasion» (Adventures 254, emphasis added).

None of the data we've collected explains why the blob between your ears is producing a subjective experience.

Translated into Whitehead's terminology, this statement becomes: «the inherent meaning of the initial datum is appropriated by the becoming occasion in accordance with its subjective aim.»

But to the extent that such data are experienced or prehended by later occasions, they are already immanent in them, and they are so even before there is any conformal reproduction of subjective forms.

But the subjective forms of the initial simple causal feelings of the subject are continuous with those of the data felt.

Mays does not comment on the remark (PR 35) that a subjective form is how that subject prehends its datum, the manner of prehension including various emotional and attitudinal characteristics.

The initial datum, which is that actual entity prehended, is already an abstraction from the full, living, subjective immediacy of that occasion's process of becoming.

Since one can not easily refer to a passage not yet contemplated, all of the passage, not just those parts referring to «data» or «subjective form (PR 85) should be regarded as a single insertion.

On the datum theory (Q), the concrescence had its underlying unity in terms of its initiating datum, and the subject was the subjective aspect of this objective datum (early sense).

Each experience in this series is a subjective process of feeling many data and synthesizing them into a complex experiential whole.

Initially, in the Gifford's Draft, the name we shall give to Whitehead's writings, largely from part II, which conceive the subject as the subjective aspect of the datum from which concrescence begins, 5 a few anticipations of subjective aim can be discerned.

The subject was the subjective side of objective being, but what is the being of the whole now that the original datum has been shattered into a multiplicity of data?

There is secondary origination of conceptual feelings with data which are partially identical with, and partially diverse from, the eternal objects forming the data in the primary phase of the mental pole; the determination of identity and diversity depending on the subjective aim at attaining depth of intensity by reason of contrast.

The principle is that in regard to the presentation of subjective aims, God has to «speak» to each actual occasion in its own «language,» that is, at its own level, in a manner harmonious with the character of the sort of data which are in general operative in the aesthetic synthesis which is the concrescence of the actual occasion in question.

Such a miracle would involve the suspension of the laws of nature at the level of primitive actual occasions, but if we accept the principle that God «speaks» to a given actual occasion in its own «language,» and if the «language» of primitive actual occasions in nature is such that the character of the data available for aesthetic synthesis in the concrescence of such occasions admits only of absolutely miniscule contrasts with the givenness of the character of the past, then God has no leverage via subjective aims to introduce shifts in the social structures conditioning the possibilities available for aesthetic synthesis in the concrescences of such primitive actual occasions.

The philosophy of organism seeks to describe how objective data pass into subjective satisfaction, and how order in the objective data provides intensity in the subjective satisfaction.

The method is realistic, not idealistic: Whitehead remarks that instead of describing, in Kantian fashion, how subjective data pass into the appearance of an objective world, he describes how subjective experience emerges from an objective world.

Our developed consciousness fastens on the sensum as datum: our basic animal experience entertains it as a type of subjective feeling.

This puts Hartshorne where he wants to be, because to intuit (prehend) actual occasions as they occur is to intuit (prehend) them formaliter, as they exist in the immediate subjectivity of concrescence, and since God is everlasting, and experiences all actual occasions formaliter, actual occasions are preserved everlastingly (in their full, warm, subjective immediacy) in the consequent nature of God.6 This interpretation resolves the question of the status of the past, the problem of how the past is given as datum for concrescing actual occasions, and the question of a ground for truth claims about the past.

In this regard, a proposition is indeed «theoretical,» but in the deeper understanding as a lure endeavoring to fix the subjective form which clothes the feeling of the proposition as a datum.

In affirming this intimate experiential source for the knowledge of man the data of objective research are not rejected, nor are the gates opened to uncontrolled subjective vagaries.

But the later occasions probably can not eliminate the decision made about them from their objective data or avoid some conformity with the subjective form of the deciding occasion.

The subjective form of a feeling is the manner in which the subject feels its datum (see PR 23 / 35).

Whitehead claims that a feeling can be analyzed into five factors:» (i) the «subject» which feels; (ii) the «initial data» which are to be felt; (iii) the «elimination» in virtue of negative prehensions; (iv) the «objective datum» which is felt; (v) the «subjective form,» which is how that subject feels that objective datum» (PR 221 / 337f.

But in more sophisticated actual entities, in entities higher up the scale of organic being which inherit positively a richer and more variegated set of data from the past, the responsive, supplemental phase is a process of sorting out the data, modifying and reorganizing it to arrive at a complex unity of subjective feeling.

But although negative prehensions eliminate their data from inclusion in the internal constitution of the new actual entity, they contribute their subjective forms to the total «emotional complex» of the final satisfaction (PR 41f.

They are the relation of the data of the past to the present and the subjective aim.

Originality (and hence life) occurs»... when the subjective aim which determines its process of concrescence has introduced a novelty of definiteness not to be found in the inherited data of its primary phase.»

There is a physical prehension of the datum according to a particular subjective form.

In their moment of occurrence they are subjective and as they complete themselves they become objective data for other events.

Another meaning of idealism, which I call epistemological or subjective idealism, is that when we experience something, have it as immediate intuitive datum, it is nothing but a quality of our own mental state (Berkeley's or Locke's idea or Hume's impression).

Rather, the prehensions have public origins, the objective data; they have private subjective forms, based on the private aim of the actual occasion; and then the occasion, having unified its prehensions, passes back into publicity, providing data for new prehensions.

Every occasion of experience arises in an initial phase in which there are initial data and the initial phase of the subjective aim.

We are often exhorted by scientists and philosophers alike to accept the material given to us by sense perception as though it is the rock - bottom foundation of our knowledge of the physical world, Simultaneously we are told to refrain from coloring neutral sense data over with our subjective wishes and teleological desires.