(until) it withdrew from the domain common to all people into the closed circle
of subjectivism.»
Focusing on the discernment of worth helps avoid the trap
of subjectivism.
Bonhoeffer claims that the problem
of subjectivism is overcome because the church is «concretely visible.
These precious few have been equipped to stand against the tide
of subjectivism that has overwhelmed our society - what the Holy Father, on the eve of his election, called the tyranny of «relativism».
Catholics acknowledge an infallible authority in questions of both dogma and morals, whereas Protestants possess no objective rule for either but are buffeted to and fro by the winds
of subjectivism and error.
His answer, however, opened his analysis to the problem
of subjectivism.
It behooves us to avoid the perils
of both subjectivism and objectivism.
Phenomenology, at least in its first practitioners and its early stages, was conceived as a conscious rejection
of subjectivism and an attempt to recover, without abandoning inwardness, the experienced reality of external things and of the self as well.
(In thus relativizing nexus to a single divine subject actual entity, transcendentism might be construed as a form
of subjectivism.)
But such a justification for following his theology lays one open to charges
of subjectivism.
But it also can rescue the individual from being let loose into a whirling centrifuge
of subjectivism and indeterminacy, a prospect even more inimical to historical understanding.
Less elegantly, I'd describe Chudy's «trap of reflection» as the quicksand pit
of a subjectivism become self - absorption, from which it's hard to extract oneself and answer the Master's call, «Come, follow me.»
And it doesn't come from any unique insight of the Austrian School, other than the fact of the combination
of the subjectivism coupled with the inherent boom - bust cycle makes those of us who use Austrian Economics very sensitive to issues of price and value.
Not exact matches
As Catholics become more and more concerned with their personal identity, the ideals and morals
of the Universal Church begin to disintegrate when faced with the «
subjectivism, relativism, emotivism, and nihilism so much in fashion in Western democracies today.»
The isolation
of Scripture study from the believing community
of faith (nuda scriptura) disregards the Holy Spirit's work in guiding the witness
of the people
of God to scriptural truths, and leaves the interpretation
of that truth vulnerable to unfettered
subjectivism.
Wary
of the dangers that radical
subjectivism and moral fanaticism pose for social solidarity and cultural coexistence, he urges us to practice humility, civility, and humor in our political dealings while holding fast to core principles such as individual freedom and human rights.
The Cartesian
subjectivism in its application to physical science became Newton's assumption
of individually existent physical bodies, with merely external relationships.
In the light
of its own records in the Gospels, it never could so individualize its thought as to be satisfied by
subjectivism alone.
Milbank claims that their basic thrust is nihilistic, as is that
of positivism, Hegelianism, liberalism, relativism,
subjectivism and pluralism, and that they are founded on the ultimacy
of aggression, violence and war.
The terms in which Whitehead describes his divergence from Descartes are extremely suggestive: for it is his mathematical or functional conception
of form that enables him to effect his «reform»
of the Cartesian
subjectivism.
The alternative is the agnosticism and
subjectivism that is destroying the Church
of England, and making Ecumenism an irrelevant concept.
They now found themselves in a situation where the
subjectivism of their «free Bible» was matched bythe
subjectivism and uncertainty
of the literally true «word
of God» itself.
But equally far from the
subjectivism of the romantic or the «I believe because it is absurd»
of the mystic, that sacrifice is called for precisely in the name
of objective truth comprehended through the «clear, logical cognition» exemplified by the modern scientist.
Even Hegel's system, for all that it sought to have done with petty
subjectivism, could do so only by way
of a massive metaphysical myth
of the self - positing
of the Concept, and
of a more terrible economy
of necessity than any pagan antiquity had imagined.
For those bred in the abstract, «objective» world
of print, such characteristics reek
of a decline into undefined «
subjectivism».
It was clear enough, Ward conceded, that the pope wished to condemn the principle
of «
subjectivism in religion.»
Whitehead's strategy against relativistic
subjectivism seems to consist
of two mutually reinforcing elements.
Still, like any philosophy, it has its dangers, the chief
of which is
subjectivism» the view, which soon became prevalent, that there is nothing but subjective consciousness and that the world is but a construction or projection
of the self.
Second, pragmatism, like all interest theories
of ethics, has no way
of escaping the
subjectivism which grounds all value ultimately on subjective feeling, nor is this any less the case because
of the objective methods that pragmatism supports for the judgment
of whether our actions will in fact produce the values that we think they will.
Subjectivism dominates not only the attitude
of our age toward values but modern thinking in general.
This criticism reveals a total misunderstanding
of Buber's philosophy
of dialogue which is, as we have seen, a narrow ridge between the abysses
of objectivism on the one side and
subjectivism on the other.
Buber, through his dialogical philosophy, avoids not only the «objectivism»
of the moral absolutists but also the «
subjectivism»
of the cultural relativists.
’35 Kuhn thus denies the allegations
of irrationality and
subjectivism.
He recognized that liberalism, as a set
of doctrines
of political morality, could not rest upon, or be defended by appeal to, any form
of religious or ethical skepticism,
subjectivism, or relativism.
It is on this point that Kuhn's critics are most vehement, accusing him
of relativism,
subjectivism and irrationality.
The recrudescent nineteenth - century theology
of Christian
subjectivism finds its literary equivalent in the current Christian chic
of salvation through autobiography alone.
Despite the views, and perhaps hopes,
of some that Whitehead's metaphysics provided an opportunity for theology to rise above empirical naturalism and provide a via media between the rationalism
of Thomistic theology and the
subjectivism of Protestantism, 17 Whitehead's actual influence on American theology during the thirties was very limited.
Whitehead says, «The philosophy
of organism extends the Cartesian
subjectivism by affirming the «ontological» principle and construing it as the definition
of «actuality»» (PR 123).
It is one thing to acknowledge the perspectival and paradigm - dependent nature
of all human knowing; it is another thing entirely to embrace multiple realities or ontological
subjectivism.
He has certainly succeeded in rebutting Thielicke's charge that by starting with the Christian understanding
of existence he betrays a
subjectivism akin to that
of Schleiermacher.
Practically, however, you all recognize the difference: you understand, for example, the disdain
of the methodist convert for the mere sky - blue healthy - minded moralist; and you likewise enter into the aversion
of the latter to what seems to him the diseased
subjectivism of the Methodist, dying to live, as he calls it, and making
of paradox and the inversion
of natural appearances the essence
of God's truth.
In the last few pages
of the book he speaks frankly about the «serious crisis» suffered by concept
of «Traditio», the «deep wound which the Church is experiencing after Vatican II», owing to the refashioning
of the understanding
of Revelation from the conceptual, propositional approach
of Vatican I and scholastic theology to the notion
of Revelation as experience and encounter, leading to «a displacement
of the dynamic aspect
of revelation to the detriment
of the noetic», «a gap between truth and love» and a «strong
subjectivism».
Now perhaps it should be said immediately that this is not a call for exegesis that is mere problem - solving activity (as the inductive preaching
of late liberal Protestantism tended to be) nor for client - centered preaching that is an exercise in self - analysis and smothering
subjectivism occasionally embroidered with Scripture verses.
This,
of course, arouses the fear that truth will be debased to arbitrary taste, and an overriding
subjectivism will dismiss every item that is not viscerally authenticated.
A relational sexual ethics has appeared to many as a way
of avoiding legalism on the one hand and normless
subjectivism on the other.
We are asking about the adequacy
of Whiteheadian
subjectivism, and more exactly, about the relationship between the concept and the status
of a Whiteheadian [actual] entity.
Unfortunately, there is a tendency to re-state Julian's words in a kind
of summing - up, and a
subjectivism that some may find off - putting.
The empirical theologians would stress the practical dangers
of the anti-realism and
subjectivism in these same thinkers.10 This is not to say that the empirical theologians would simply call these late twentieth century thinkers nihilistic, for that assumes that the loss
of foundationalism simply requires the loss
of realism and that the acceptance
of relativism simply requires
subjectivism.
The American religious empiricist so understood could accept what these postmodern philosophers and theologians have elucidated without dismissing them as nihilists; but these postmodernists, in turn, also are close enough to the American religious empiricist to hear their critique
of postmodern anti-realism and
subjectivism.16
Say what you please about this being a reversion to «primitive hylozoism,» or «primitive animism,» it remains true that it is one
of the three options we confront (if we ignore mere
subjectivism or positivism) and that the other two are also open to easy rejection.