Micheline Piekarski, president of the Illinois School Food Service Association, said some schools might find it cheaper to drop out
of subsidized lunch programs altogether and offer more expensive, less nutritious ala carte menus instead of full meals.
Not exact matches
Interesting fact: In response to the USDA's
subsidized school
lunch program during the Reagan administration, ketchup was counted as one
of the two servings
of fruit or vegetables for a reimbursable
lunch.
For the first time, a majority
of the country's public school students — 51 percent
of them, to be precise — fell below the federal government's threshold for being «low income,» meaning they were eligible for a free or
subsidized school
lunch.
Last week, the Department
of Agriculture proposed new guidelines for nutritional standards in the federally
subsidized school
lunch program.
The USDA knew all along that the Paid Meal Equity provision
of the HHFKA would likely drive participation downward, and while the intent is well - meaning (to make sure that reimbursements for low income kids» meals are not unintentionally
subsidizing lower prices for slightly more affluent paying students), no one benefits when fewer kids eat the school
lunch.
Brian Wansink, a food behavior specialist and author
of «Mindless Eating,» said that might mean making the nachos less accessible — and certainly not a choice for a
subsidized daily
lunch.
Even before I started The
Lunch Tray, I'd read in Janet Poppendieck's Free for All: Fixing School Food in America references to data showing that, on average, children who regularly eat the federally subsidized school meal consume a wider variety of nutrients than those who consistently eat a home - packed l
Lunch Tray, I'd read in Janet Poppendieck's Free for All: Fixing School Food in America references to data showing that, on average, children who regularly eat the federally
subsidized school meal consume a wider variety
of nutrients than those who consistently eat a home - packed
lunchlunch.
In 2013, for the first time, a majority
of public - school students in this country — 51 percent, to be precise — fell below the federal government's low - income cutoff, meaning they were eligible for a free or
subsidized school
lunch.
One potential obstacle to the program is the refusal
of many school districts to install salad bars for food - safety reasons and because
of cumbersome USDA rules governing the federally
subsidized school
lunch program that feeds some 31 million U.S. school children every day.
She looked at her students, most
of whom rely on government -
subsidized free
lunches at school.
The resulting stigma can sometimes discourage free / reduced
lunch children — desperate to appear «cool» in front
of their peers — from eating the
subsidized lunch altogether and instead going hungry.
In fact, to the extent children are being fed junk food in the classroom, it's likely they will then consume less
of the nutritionally balanced, taxpayer -
subsidized meal offered in the
lunch room.
At Louisa May Alcott School, the first
of the three, students are now getting all - organic
lunch choices partially
subsidized by the food service industry.
Second, according to Poppendieck, by offering junk food in the same venue as the regular meal, the school district may feel pressured to keep the federally
subsidized school
lunch competitive by offering its own version
of «junk food» items (hence the prevalence
of pizza on school menus).
According to Janet Poppendieck, the sale
of so - called «competitive foods» (because they compete with the
subsidized school
lunch) had taken place for decades but escalated considerably in response to Reagan - era cuts in domestic social spending.
Federally
subsidized lunches must have a certain number
of vegetables to be served.
The new standards, which go into effect July 1, mark the first time the U.S. Department
of Agriculture program will directly dictate nutrition for any food sold in schools during the school day — not just the traditional
lunches and breakfasts long
subsidized through the federal school
lunch program.
- The LFBT hysteria: Calls for the elimination
of a cost - saving product from taxpayer
subsidized lunch programs in the complete absence
of any scientifically verifiable health or safety detriment.
Parents had to pay a fee each semester for the
lunches, and it was
subsidized fro low income families (about 1/3
of the school).
- Other demands made
of the school
lunch apparatus — ALL
lunches served in public schools are
subsidized and thus represent food welfare programs.
For many children, the federally -
subsidized meals program, where milk is a required element at breakfast and at
lunch, is an important source
of calcium and vitamin D — at least when school is in session.
One potential obstacle to the program is the refusal
of many school districts to install salad bars for sanitation reasons and because
of cumbersome USDA rules governing the federally -
subsidized school
lunch program that feeds some 31 million U.S. school children every day.
While milk has been the keystone
of America's school
lunches since the federally
subsidized program was established in 1946, the role
of chocolate (and other flavored) milk has become a focus
of late following a 2006 rule that required schools to establish comprehensive «wellness programs.»
Today, for instance, Big Boy came home with a bottle
of Nestle «Pure Life» flavored bottled water — part
of the taxpayer
subsidized school
lunch program.
While the federal
lunch program
subsidizes school meals at a rate
of $ 2.68 each, schools must shoulder the other costs.
«I really try to be very understanding because I really want to get a nutritious
lunch or breakfast in these kids,» said Osborn, adding that about 16 percent
of her district's 3,500 students qualify for
subsidized meals.
As the New York Times article discusses more fully, the impetus for the price increase was a finding by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a research organization in Washington, that by keeping the price
of the full meal too low, the paid meals were effectively being
subsidized by the federal dollars which are supposed to be allocated to the meals provided to kids who are on free / reduced
lunch.
I've already written about the way such a system creates a real sense
of «haves» and «have nots,» such that hungry kids on free / reduced
lunch sometimes forgo a meal entirely rather than be seen in the «uncool»
subsidized lunch line.
WASHINGTON — The Agriculture Department says 524 schools — out
of about 100,000 — have dropped out
of the federally
subsidized national school
lunch program since the government introduced new standards for healthier foods last year.
Controversial federal legislation to limit funding for
subsidized school
lunches and change some
of the program's nutritional standards passed a House committee on a 20 - 14 vote May 18, and the proposal is being hammered by critics who believe it would endanger the health
of American school children.
A number
of districts across the country have moved to equalize across schools the share
of poor students, as measured by eligibility for
subsidized lunch.
Schools not offering the
subsidized lunch program also tended to overlap with schools having a higher concentration
of white students, highly suggestive
of the existence
of a set
of charter schools serving disproportionate numbers
of non-poor, white students.
Though we do not have data on every aspect
of teachers» working conditions, we do know certain characteristics
of their students that many believe affect the teaching conditions at a school: the percentage
of low - income students at the school (as estimated by the percentage eligible for a
subsidized lunch), the shares
of students who are African - American or Hispanic, average student test scores, and class sizes.
They also do not differ significantly in their initial per - pupil spending, average class size, percentage
of students receiving
subsidized school
lunches, percentage
of students with limited English proficiency or disabilities, and the mobility
of their student populations.
Similarly, the effects were substantially larger among students who were eligible for
subsidized lunch (regardless
of race) relative to students who were not eligible.
Likewise, the typical student eligible for free or reduced - price
lunch (a proxy for economic disadvantage) attends a school where almost two - thirds
of students are also eligible for a
subsidized lunch.
Ninety percent
of the students at the school are Latino, 73 percent qualify for
subsidized lunch, and 65 percent arrived lacking credits they would need to graduate on time.
We find that the accountability provisions
of NCLB generated large and statistically significant increases in the math achievement
of 4th graders and that these gains were concentrated among African American and Hispanic students and among students who were eligible for
subsidized lunch.
Some 80 percent
of its students qualified for
subsidized lunches, and 31 percent were designated as English language learners.
There is a clear association, with more disadvantaged districts having lower opt - out rates, on average, but also a large amount
of variation in the opt - out rate among districts with similar shares
of students eligible for the
subsidized lunch program.
The Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS), TEA's statewide database, reports key demographic data, including race, ethnicity, and gender for students and school personnel, as well as student eligibility for
subsidized lunch (a standard indicator
of poverty).
The law also required annual statewide tests in grades 3 through 8, and again in high school, and states had to publish the performances
of students on these tests for every school, breaking out the results by ethnicity, eligibility for a
subsidized lunch, and a variety
of other categories.
For a final check, we added controls for a full set
of cohort - level variables, including race, gender, participation in the federal
subsidized lunch program, and median zip code income.
Sixty - one percent
of these children were black, while 85 percent were eligible for
subsidized school
lunches.
Although Brookline is Boston's closest suburb, surrounded by Boston on three sides, less than 10 percent
of Runkle's students qualify for free or
subsidized lunch.
We learned that 37 percent
of their pupils qualify for the federal
subsidized lunch program, almost the same as the 39 percent in the national public high school population.
The federal government now
subsidizes school
lunches to the tune
of almost $ 9.5 billion every year.
More recently, this has been replaced by balancing schools according to socioeconomic status, limiting the number
of students in each school eligible for
subsidized lunches to under 40 percent (see «Fraud in the Lunchroom?»
The percentage
of schools with more than 40 percent
subsidized -
lunch students has doubled in six years.
More than 800 miles south
of Summit Sierra, in south San Jose, Summit Tahoma high school serves 300 students; about half are eligible for a
subsidized lunch and two - thirds are Hispanic.