Sentences with phrase «of substantive comments»

After examining the manuscript, I send back 3 — 4 pages of substantive comments.

Not exact matches

Richard John Neuhaus» comment on Douglas Laycock's «Substantive Neutrality Revisited» law - review article (While We're At It, June / July 2008) referred to Philip Hamburger's 2002 book Separation of Church and State as a «magnificent» debunking of Jefferson's wall between church and state.

Though I have no intention of engaging you in a substantive debate of the scriptural evidence against your views (you have made it abundantly clear it would be pointless) I would like to comment on your behavior.

Your «nice try» comment is simply an attempt to deflect away from the substance of this argument, in trying to denigrate me as irrelevant... when in fact, all it does is reflect that you are trying to «get me to go away» because you have no substantive argument left to make.

I was merely commenting on the total «lack» of any cogent response by @sun in relationship to the other posters here, and as the discussion went forward, I was also commenting on @sun's continuing «lack» of «any» substantive fact - based reasoned response.

They are not governments - that kind of deal - making comes in December (or rather in the glacial negotiating sessions throughout this year), so I see no problem with them having earnest conversations deep into the night about the relative merits of carbon taxes over cap and trade, or any other issue, that have no substantive outcome other than to generate more research proposals, newspaper column inches and comments in well - meaning blogs.

This editorial and other comments like it over-simplifying the substantive issues surrounding the hijab crisis in Osun State and the historical background to it (and CAN's infantile reactions) stand in poor contrast with other excellent news coverage of the issue and public comments.

Governor Andrew Cuomo responded to the news that Board of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch will step down at the end of her current term with polite praise, but no substantive comment on her tenure.

«This is the first example of a small molecule — which can be easily prepared and made on a large scale — that shows substantive post-exposure protection against Ebola virus in nonhuman primates,» Bavari commented.

An edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the substantive concerns or comments; minor concerns are not usually shown.

These substantive posts are intended to be a source of community comment on a particular topic, which readers can browse through without having to sift out a lot of unrelated comments.

And so, although of course I highly value all comments by my readers, I'm going ask you to please respect some boundaries on substantive posts like this one.

Star Michelle Yeoh gets a solo showcase for her thoughts on the «Conversation with Michelle Yeoh» featurette, in whose 13 minutes she makes more substantive comments than Schamus does in his two hours (totally unsolicited word of advice to Ms. Yeoh: rethink those hoop earrings!).

But meaningful parental involvement in a «reform» planning process doesn't happen when you don't give notice of the meeting, don't have anything relevant for parents to comment on, and don't give a presentation that is substantive.

The General Attorney occupation covers professional legal positions involved in preparing cases for trial and / or the trial of cases before a court or an administrative body or persons having quasi-judicial power; rendering legal advice and services with respect to questions, regulations, practices, or other matters falling within the purview of a Federal Government agency (this may include conducting investigations to obtain evidentiary data); preparing interpretative and administrative orders, rules, or regulations to give effect to the provisions of governing statutes or other requirements of law; drafting, negotiating, or examining contracts or other legal documents required by the agency's activities; drafting, preparing formal comments, or otherwise making substantive recommendations with respect to proposed legislation; editing and preparing for publication statutes enacted by Congress, opinions or discussions of a court, commission, or board; drafting and reviewing decisions for consideration and adoption by agency officials.

Judge Cote ruled this week (PDF) that the brief they already submitted — which «contains five pages of substantive arguments that do not address the question of whether leave to file amici curiae responses is appropriate, but rather oppose approval of the proposed Final Judgment» — will suffice as B&N and the ABA's only comment on the matter, and «no additional filings from the ABA and Barnes & Noble shall be permitted.»

Readers will often look past substantive issues and finish the book, but they won't pick up another book by that author, and they will leave negative comments, such as, «Some parts were confusing» (a problem with consistency), «The writing was choppy» (a problem with flow within and between paragraphs), «It wasn't well written» (a problem with awkward sentences and possibly other various issues), «I wasn't sure who was saying what» or «The dialogue wasn't that great,» and «It didn't really hold my attention» or «The story was boring» (a problem with telling instead of showing).

This sub has passed 20k subscribers and I've been encouraged by the increased number of people posting quality content and leaving substantive comments.

Not so co-incidentally, they also excluded any substantive discussion of the two peer - reviewed comments (Huybers and von Storch) and the Wahl and Ammann Climatic Change paper (then in press), which remains to this day the most substantive peer - reviewed treatment of M&M «hockey stick» critique.

I note that a lot of the discussion here has moved away from the subject of press releases, but it's been for the most part interesting and substantive, so I'm inclined to let it go on for a while longer before closing the comment form.

Blair, pardon me if I seemed to be over-reactive, but if you follow the topic of climate change for more than a very short while you'll see that all too often the «argument» of people who disagree with results they don't like is to mount the ultimate personal attack: they try to substitute comments about an author's personal background for substantive comment about the author's work.

We noticed some substantive questions in the comments section and wanted to address them directly, but first, many of these answered might become clearer if people read the accompanying blog post released at the same time as the tool in question.

(I looked through most of the comments and didn't see a single substantive critique on the substance.)

15 of the experts are Review Editors who will ensure that all substantive comments during the review stages are given appropriate consideration by the Authors.

In addition there are two comments, both of which are substantive and bring into question the validity of the method.

Nasty attacks that get personal, particularly in comments that do not have any kind of substantive scientific argument or reference, will be deleted

Chris Colose does however raise some substantive criticisms of the Cato report in the comments beginning here.

According to the IPCC guidelines, Review Editors are supposed to ``... assist the Working Group / Task Force Bureaux in identifying reviewers for the expert review process, ensure that all substantive expert and government review comments are afforded appropriate consideration, advise lead authors on how to handle contentious / controversial issues and ensure genuine controversies are reflected adequately in the text of the Report.»

My comment on «modelers are very clever and know the effect of modeling choices on emergent properties» aroused an emotional reaction but no substantive response a few posts ago here from Ken Rice

I think your comment, which is adversarial rather than substantive, is likely to make you look foolish in the eyes of those readers.

As an initial move, I posted a comment on Troy Master's blog (he also had a post attacking Shindell's paper), in which I pointed out that Shindell's RC piece, far from answering all the substantive points in my CA post, had simply ignored most of them.

If anyone can point to a substantive detailed discussion of this, I'd appreciate a comment on the current open thread.

But if I were to make a more substantive and reasoned comment about the quality of Mann's research then according to the judge that would be an allegation of fact that must be scrutinuized in a half million dollar judicial circus with almost no chance of recovering costs.

They contain unique information, such as substantive annotations or comments included therein, that adds to a proper understanding of the agency's formulation and execution of basic policies, decisions, actions, or responsibilities.

And, also, I note, and this seems somewhat typical, you do not address one substantive point I attempt to raise — most of my comment was addressed as questions — why not answer them, instead of attempting ad hominem dismissals?

Also for what it's worth, there are a number of open - minded and knowledgeable individuals who host and regularly comment here, who are willing to cordially engage in substantive conversations, and provide insights into some very technical and confusing areas.

Note plenty of substantive critique all over here, including the rest of my own comments.

I welcome substantive comments — by which I don't mean denunciations of «deniers» or «ecoNazis,» or lazy ad hominem attacks and conspiracy theories about who's being paid off by whom.

The role of Review Editors in the IPCC assessment process is to assist the Working Group / Task Force Bureaux in identifying reviewers for the expert review process, ensure that all substantive expert and government review comments are afforded appropriate consideration by the author teams, advise Lead Authors on how to handle contentious / controversial issues and ensure genuine controversies are reflected adequately in the text of the report.

We can only hope those who currently skulking on other websites might come and contribute to the process of opening up climate science, and debate the substantive issues rather than passing comment among their own coterie on Judith's motivation, competence, expertise and integrity.

However, as you can see by reading carefully through the 561 comments on the Montford post to which the current post is a rebuttal, Gavin has declined to extend the discussion at RC and has not posted follow up comments from a number of substantive and polite commentaters here.

M. de Rougemont provided substantive critique 29 July 2015 (Unfortunately also a slew of downward radiation not possible comments by those who know little physics.)

kenfritsch, I did send Kate Marvel, Gavin Schmidt and Ron Miller details of the substantive criticisms in my draft article prior to publishing it, and invited their comments.

[Response: Discussion of blogs comment policies on threads that are actually related to substantive issues, just leads to distraction.

By the way, it is interesting — and disappointing — that your response complains about the «adjectives» I used, and completely ignores the two peer - reviewed studies on the EROI of solar and wind that I linked to and excerpted, which were a direct and substantive response to your comment «regarding EROI and energy needed for our industrial economy».

That is, the comments and responses would need to be relevent, substantive and informed to a level appropriate for the scientific discussion of issue in question.

As Review Editor of Chapter 3... I can confirm that all substantive expert and government review comments have been afforded appropriate consideration by the writing team in accordance with IPCC procedures.

Blogs are somewhat interactive in the comments portion, I suppose, but most of the substantive blogs that I read have no comments.

I'll leave the substantive comments on the validity and merits of the decision to those with the expertise.

Marion Boyd's argument is reflected in Omar's comments: if one does not hold out the possibility of enforcing a family arbitral award made under Islamic law, at least on some grounds (and she set out a number of conditions about procedural and substantive fairness), then those who go to arbitration under that law anyway have no protection in civil law, and the arbitrator has no incentive to conform to our general notions of fairness.