Not exact matches
In addition to marking it up, a good
substantive or developmental editor will make lots
of queries (questions for the author) on the manuscript, where a copy editor will mostly clean up the language as - is, and a proofreader is usually purely focused on correcting any
errors of usage or formatting.
Even worse, that review contains numerous
substantive errors, some
of which appear to have been introduced by a failure to consult cited sources directly, notably in a discussion
of a key quote from Edward Wegman himself.
To do this effectively, the researcher must have the
substantive, foundational knowledge discussed in the preceding sections.111 And, admittedly, if a student has had less instruction on where to click, then the task
of locating information may take a bit
of trial and
error.
The classic case is that
of Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission in which the House
of Lords made it plain that
errors of process and
substantive errors that failed to match administrative law standards were reviewable notwithstanding a privative clause in the statute that conferred the decision - making power under challenge.
At the Court
of Appeal, UBC alleged that the Tribunal had made several
errors of fact and law, including in refusing to consider modifications
of the residency program as relevant to finding that disability was a factor in Dr. Kelly's adverse treatment and in considering both the procedural and
substantive elements
of the duty to accommodate.
From the claims LAWPRO has seen, it is clear «dabblers» (lawyers acting outside
of their usual practice area) are more likely to commit malpractice
errors, and in particular a failure to know or apply
substantive law.
Green J. reviewed the caselaw on the issue, and concluded that in that case, where the intention
of the judge was to impose two years (24 months) and not twenty - five months incarceration, and where the
error, although not clerical or administrative in nature was «an
error, a slip
of the tongue or clerical change rather than a
substantive change,» he concluded he still had jurisdiction to make the necessary amendment to the sentence.
The prevalence
of shorter, simpler emails is also consistent with my recent legal experience as a litigation associate in a large law firm before starting to teach legal writing full - time — an experience I have drawn on in trying to design realistic assignments.59 The emails I wrote often dealt with relatively straightforward
substantive matters, procedural questions surrounding litigation, or some combination
of the two, such as the steps for having an appellate court relinquish jurisdiction to correct a scrivener's
error in a lower - court judgment or the timeline for responding to an in rem civil forfeiture action.
Most recently, in R v Oakes, 2016 ABCA 90, the case that is my topic here, the majority ruling
of Justices Myra Bielby and Frederica Schutz, at para. 11, adopted the opinion in R v Truscott (2007), 225 CCC (3d) 321 (Ont CA) where a unanimous five member panel
of the Ontario Court
of Appeal stated, at para. 110, that the power to overturn a conviction founded in a miscarriage
of justice, ``... can reach virtually any kind
of error that renders the trial unfair in a procedural or
substantive way.»
Students in the midst
of law school, with its mountain
of reading on cases and
substantive law, might be surprised to learn that «
errors of law» are not the biggest pitfall to watch out for in the world
of private practice.