But the decision to lift the moratorium did not sit well with scientists who have long warned of the
risks of such research — and questioned its benefits.
The
point of such research of course is to prepare national governments and civic authorities for the dangerous levels of heat on the way.
Let's not argue about the
validity of such research and about healthcare rankings, but that «evidence» suggests that they did everything right.
The report's authors hope that early public discussion of potentially controversial work — before it is undertaken — will help to encourage wider
acceptance of such research.
After all, only the most cynical would suggest the outcomes of
much of such research tends to support the product or service proposition being offered by the provider.
This is why the public has to fund public - purpose research by taxing and spending, if it wants the
results of such research to be freely available.
CREATE publications were written by the project's investigators in order to highlight effective teaching practices developed through their research and described
findings of such research.
My position, which I commend for your consideration, is as follows: While I do not rule out the morality of research into human cloning, I do support a moratorium on such research, which would be removed in light of strong evidence for the positive
benefits of such research and after concrete proposals have been formulated for avoiding the potential risks.
The US government, the World Health Organization (WHO) and other bodies are now frantically trying to put together this mechanism, along with a framework for international
oversight of such research.
In other words, requiring a fiduciary level of service will precipitate the propagation of research that supports such service, and
proliferation of such research increases the number of appropriately informed investors, which decreases the potential pervasiveness of information asymmetries.
The approval on February 1 by the UK's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) represents the world's first endorsement
of such research by any national regulatory authority.
But the review panel says that scientists should be careful not to make exaggerated claims about the medical
impact of such research, and funding organizations should encourage more cooperation between basic and clinical researchers to make sure experimental results have maximum impact.
Practical
implications of such research have not been fully explored, but we have already recognized that pups less than three or four weeks old may respond abnormally to modified live vaccines.
A sharply divided panel of the Seventh Circuit, led by Judge Posner, addressed the issue
of such research in deciding an appeal by a pro se prisoner alleging his civil rights had been violated by inadequate medical treatment.21 Judge Posner's majority opinion reversing the judgment below cited facts from various extrarecord medical websites, including Wikipedia.
It is further suggested that the great
beneficiaries of such research are sick infants, and that a large portion of the «human tissue» in question is from fetuses aborted spontaneously (e.g., in miscarriages).
One of the most helpful
examinations of such research is David Kinnaman's book, You Lost Me, which is based on data from The Barna Group gathered from 2007 and 2011.
A very significant step away from embryonic stem - cell research was taken recently when a previously forthright
advocate of such research softened his stance on other ethical alternatives.
It was only later that he weighed in, firmly emphasising the
debunking of such research and the «insidious effect» it has had on society.
The ease with which the cyberspace medium allows for these types of studies also raises issues about the ethical and legal
dimensions of such research.
Scientists in London have asked for permission to edit the genomes of human embryos — a request that could lead to the world's first
approval of such research by a national regulatory body.
Opponents of such research argue that some studies have shown that stem cells from adults could produce the same results without the ethical problems.
The research is limited by its sample size; only 19 people could be enrolled due to the
expense of such research and the restrictiveness of the carefully controlled protocol.
This requires finesse because policies that conflict with the fundamental
openness of such research are sure to be counterproductive.
«Research using mouse models is important in developing our understanding of basic neurology and physiology but it is highly premature and unwise to come to any conclusions on the
basis of such research or to apply any findings to humans.
Scientific publications by non-staff
astronomers of such research should carry an asterisk by the author's name referring to the a footnote with the following credit lines:
But new findings by researchers associated with the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) and the Department of Astrophysical Sciences at Princeton University indicate that turbulent swirls of plasma could benefit one of the two major
branches of such research.
Set to a spoken - word narrative about the creation of the universe, Grosse Fatigue, among the first time - based works one encounters in curator Massimiliano Gioni's Arsenale (and the winner of the Fifty - Fifth Venice Biennale's Silver Lion), tracks the
range of such research agendas with an expanding field of images that pop up, roil, collide, and implode across a computer screen, a digital tabula rasa that itself perpetually reinvents the world.
The debate over the merits and risks
of such research brings to mind a conversation I recently had with Pete Seeger up at his mountainside cabin here in the Hudson Highlands.
If someone
knows of such research and experimentation, I would be greatful if they would point me to the resource.