The
results of such surveys are rarely shared; they can indeed have high commercial value or simply be embarrassing.
Now, commercial providers, nonprofit organizations, and foundations are working to expand and refine the scope
of such surveys in an effort to improve their usefulness to schools and teachers.
I know a bit about this subject, having supervised the design and
conduct of such surveys in both the public and private sectors.
The first major survey of homosexuality in America, The Gay Report of 1979, remains one of the
largest of such surveys and is widely regarded as a benchmark.
Yet the globalization of the art world, combined with the erosion of whatever was left of the traditional boundaries of the concept of art, make the
idea of such a survey a daunting, if not pointless, task.
I also find it more than a bit odd that a site that wants to be seen as solemn refers a survey like this without even mentioning the doubtful core
quality of such a survey.
The
costs of such surveys is very reasonable for two reasons: the cost of inspecting facilities is low with these cameras and, once leaks are found, the cost of repairing the leaks is largely (often entirely) paid for by the value of the gas conserved by fixing the leaks.
Because judicial performance evaluations are «one of the few opportunities that attorneys have to comment on the efficiency and performance of a judicial officer,» JPE commissions should make an effort to explain the
importance of such surveys to attorneys and ensure identifying information never appears in the results.
While it is difficult to measure the
authenticity of such survey results, respondents appear to echo increasing hostility towards SegWit2x, which is drawing in practically every business and figure in the cryptocurrency industry.
The account of the «testing» could no doubt have been compiled retrospectively
out of such a survey.
By requiring them positively to opt out
of such surveys, the content of which seems to be less than clear to the parents anyway, parental consent is made the rule, with conscientious objection being the exception.