Baldwin's comparison of the sale of Joseph to other examples
of suffering servants (Isaiah 53: 3 - 6; Zechariah 11:12 - 13, 13:7 - 9) echoes some of the typology used in early Christian interpretation and it is good not to overlook this part of the history of exegesis.
In this situation it should come as no surprise that not many volunteers have come forth to play the role
of suffering servants.
It may be, especially as the Greek word pais can mean both «son» and «servant», that the title was a way of interpreting Jesus» ministry in the light of passages in Isaiah which speak
of a Suffering Servant, who was called to be a «covenant for the people and a light for the gentiles» (Isa.
They know instead that true pastoral care helps to unify our suffering with
that of the Suffering Servant, who redeems us, and sanctifies us, and strengthens us to suffer with dignity in truth, as Christ himself suffered silently, conquering death upon the cross.
First, your heritage has its own explications of the role
of the Suffering Servant in Korean history.
Only the acceptance of the mission
of the Suffering Servant, i.e., mission in Christ's way, and a theology of kenosis or self emptying, will enable us to cross a frontier.
Will the Korean churches be willing to place their financial resources in a common pool to which all may have access, so that you may indeed be free to follow in the foot steps
of the Suffering Servant, Jesus Christ Our Lord and Saviour?
Such a task can not be undertaken except in the way
of the Suffering Servant, because missionaries are not soldiers.
Reproached for altering the figure of the «holy Yehudi» in For the Sake of Heaven according to a conscious or unconscious Christian tendency, Buber answers that there is not one single trait of this figure which is not already to be found in the tradition
of the suffering servant.
If the meek are understood to be living embodiments of relational power, if they are in fact members
of a suffering servant people, then the proposition is surely interesting.
In this regard it appears justifiable to say that no obvious bond still connects the notion
of the suffering servant (Ebed Jahweh) to that of the witness.
John Bright, The Kingdom of God, pp. 208 - 14, regards Jesus as definitely believing himself to be the Messiah, but in the pattern and concept
of the Suffering Servant.
It was in a sequence of servant poems, and in particular his portrayal
of the Suffering Servant in Isaiah 53, that he set forth at the same time his high hopes for his people and the mode by which God would bring this to pass.
Whatever the prophet meant by his description
of the suffering servant of the Lord, what seemed obvious to Jesus» disciples may very well have been equally so for him.
The quotation is from the description
of the suffering servant of the Lord in the fifty - third chapter of Isaiah (v 4), where more than anywhere else in the Old Testament the early church saw a portrait of Jesus.
But soon it was realized — partly as a result of the remembrance of Jesus» own utter humility and denial of self, particularly as associated with his awful suffering and his uncomplaining acceptance of it as the will of God; partly under the influence of a fresh reading
of the Suffering Servant passages in Isaiah; (commented on earlier) and, not least, as a consequence of the community's own experience of the forgiveness of sins — soon, I say, it was realized that the whole significance of Jesus» earthly life culminated in his death.
We see it foreshadowed in Second Isaiah's portrayal
of the Suffering Servant as the true Messiah.
Many Christian scholars hold that Jesus interpreted his role [and the meaning of messiahship] in terms
of the Suffering Servant pattern.
The story
of the Suffering Servant under the Babylonian Empire appears in the Servant song of Isaiah 53.
The idea
of the Suffering Servant, a dominant theme in Hebraic Christian theology, stresses that the one who comes ultimately to give life and hope to humankind is the one who suffers for humankind, who gives himself for that humanity.
Here Jesus is distinctly seen in terms
of the Suffering Servant, and the Suffering Servant, however mysterious a figure he may be, was one whose vicarious sufferings were for the sake of the healing of his people.
The very presentation
of the Suffering Servant, therefore, charged the people with guilt and faced them with shame.
One of the most impressive themes developed by Second Isaiah is that
of the suffering servant.
Is that a reflection of the Christian hope that was brought about by and through the acts
of the Suffering Servant?
Those who follow Jesus will have to take this ministry seriously since this is the ministry
of a suffering servant.
Not exact matches
The job
of civil
servants is to speak truth to power, and yes occasionally
suffer the consequences.
Jesus understood that the Messianic King
of Psalm 2 was also the
Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53 — a sacrificial lamb who would be rejected and cut off from the land
of the living.
Also, Isaiah chapter 53 does not refer to an individual as the «
suffering servant», but to all
of Israel (the people) as a unit.
He begins again to tell the story
of God's plan to restore all
of creation, from the covenant with Abraham to the exodus from Egypt, from Ezekiel's valley
of dry bones to Isaiah's
suffering servant.
By the time he applied the term «Son
of man» to the
suffering servant prophecy, «the Son
of man» must have meant to him practically «I.» Obviously all this can not be proved; other possibilities must be recognized.
Moltmann's diagnosis, then, is twofold: (1) it seems wrong to play or dance while others are
suffering, and (2) play has too often become the
servant of the oppressor.
But the
servant - form is no mere outer garment, and therefore the God must
suffer all things, endure all things, make experience
of all things.
As never before in the history
of the Christian consciousness, the modern Jew has appeared and has been real as the
suffering servant, the broken one in whose agony the world can behold and know the pain
of humanity.
On a wave
of popular youth appeal, Corbyn as
suffering servant and capitalist reformer has captured the imagination
of those seeking a new political future.
The
suffering servant / Savior passage
of Isaiah 53 does not explicitly teach His resurrection, but does speak
of His bearing the sin
of many and making intercession for the transgressors (Isa53: 12).
When Christians searched the Old Testament for texts bearing on the Resurrection they would be struck by Psalm 16:10: «Thou wilt not abandon my soul to Hades, nor let thy loyal
servant suffer corruption», This prophecy was a powerful weapon in the armory
of Christian apologetic.
We can not corrupt the memory
of those faithful
servants of God like Paul whose
suffering is part
of a witness to the gospel.
Hello, hope for every long -
suffering, imperfect, demon - fighting, disability - challenged, stage - frightened, anxiety - ridden, on - the - verge -
of - a-pity-party
servant of the gospel who ever lived.
There is the strange figure
of the
Servant in Second Isaiah whose
suffering, even if it is not the
suffering of God, is the way to redemption.
We have said that the Hebrew faith does not come to a clear resolution
of the question
of how the
suffering either
of God or the
Servant enters into the redemptive work
of love.
of Jesus being born years later... no rule saying it could not have happened.Jesus perfectly described the
Suffering Servant..
Pathil says, that the vision
of the church as «the herald and
servant of the Kingdom
of God» would be a much more appealing model, since it contains a two-fold relativisation
of church, one in the
suffering servant relation to the world and the other in its relation to the Kingdom to come.
But he also thought
of himself as the
Suffering Servant of God, a Messiah who would conquer not by political power, as many
of his contemporaries hoped, or by dramatic and spectacular intervention, as the apocalyptists expected, but by the long, slow process
of winning men to faith in God and to the love
of God and one another.
I challenge all readers to read the chapters preceding Isaiah 53 (chapters 41 thru 52) and you will see for yourself that the author
of Isaiah is referring to the nation
of Israel as the «
suffering servant», not to the future messiah, and therefore, not to Jesus.
As the failure
of the judge leads to the king and the failure
of the king to the prophet, so the failure
of the prophet in his opposition to the king leads to the conception
of two new types
of leader who will set the dialogue aright — the Messiah
of YHVH and the «
suffering servant of the Lord.»
This prophet and those associated with him saw that the call
of God to Israel was not to recover the glory
of kings David and Solomon but to be a
Suffering Servant among the nations.
The Messianic mystery is based on a real hiddenness which penetrates to the innermost existence and is essential to the
servant's work
of suffering.
«Whosoever accomplishes in Israel the active
suffering of Israel, he is the
servant, and he is Israel, in whom YHVH «glorifies Himself.»»
In so far as Israel's great
suffering in the dispersion was willingly and actively borne, it is interpreted in the image
of the
servant.
The
Suffering Servant figure is based upon the concept of penal suffering f
Suffering Servant figure is based upon the concept
of penal
suffering f
suffering for wrong.