Sentences with phrase «of supposed reasons»

One of the supposed reasons that gets banded about is that the platform holders and publishers rely on a strong retail presence.

Now there's a myriad of supposed reasons for this inactivity in the transfer market, Many slating Wenger and even more justifying this with statements about the clubs cash reserves and also its self - sufficient business model etc, and there's so much touted by everybody who has an opinion that it's really hard to know where the truth even begins to lay.

Not exact matches

More importantly for Amazon, the tablet is supposed to encourage users to buy more Amazon products and services, which is part of the reason why the company is selling the device so cheaply.

The heavy concrete is supposed to make a body sink to the bottom of a river or the ocean, but — for reasons that remain unclear — it might not have worked in this case.

One of the reasons Alibaba may set a new IPO fundraising bar is because one of its major shareholders, Yahoo Inc., is supposed to sell about 208 million shares, too.

Suppose that beer production is 100, but for some reason - less beer on international markets, more pizza or some combination of the two - the relative demand for beer increases, and beer producers are now able to obtain three pizzas for one beer.

If as our results suggest equity is not safer, there is every reason to suppose that bank capital costs have increased as a consequence of regulation, and that this may to some extent have reduced credit flows.

Investors have every reason to be confused, given Harper's stance in favour of more openness to foreign takeovers during the 2008 election campaign, and the supposed influence on his policy of the Red Wilson panel, which basically dismissed fears that corporate Canada was being «hollowed out.»

Whatever the reason, various studies have suggested that this supposed home field investment portfolio advantage is not real, but many of us still continue to allow our portfolios to be dominated by our home market.

There is no reason why prices should be constant, but we suppose this myth is necessary to bolster the belief that the value of money is 1 / P (P being prices).

The reason they could not know is that Paul made up the story of the resurrection long after the supposed event.

Most eventually go back to believing, so I suppose it's not a surprise that none of them would have been available for the study, but in any given group of atheists there are always a good number who say they don't believe while secretly looking for a reason to go back.

If this takes place with the truths of Hellenic culture then there is no a priori reason to suppose it can not happen with the truths uncovered by modern science.

Some of John's followers seem to have remained convinced that their master was greater than Jesus, but there is no reason to suppose that John shared their feeling (cf. Jn 3:27 - 30).

For me I figured that if there is a God out there who does who does actually have a plan for us and if part of that plan is to not be made known but would rather have us develop faith, and if the reason for why we need to have faith is to see if we are going to follow God because we choose to instead of being made to have to follow, and if the reason for all of those commandments is to somehow be for our benefit, and if I really want to and need to know, which I did, and that this supposed God wanted for us to find out through study, prayer and trying to practice those teachings to see for ourselves and then make our choice, then I figured to do just that and find out for myself.

Bohr, by a certain insight, was led to suppose that there is a lowest orbit, for reasons that are entirely outside of our understanding at present.

Same reason they Photoshop Hillary Clinton off White house photo of Osama's death, They also believe women are not suppose to be seen in position of power.We should observe that too while we are it.

Futhermore, where experience is mixed, as with our experience of the world's good and evil, a priori reasoning can be of considerable importance in supporting our confidence that some supposed «felt concrete redemption is no illusion but an authentic experience of what really is (and perhaps even must be) the case.

I suppose this is part of the reason we have different translations, and also why we need teachers who understand Greek, Hebrew, and cultural backgrounds.

The most probable conclusion to draw from passages of this sort is that either Thomas or earlier Gnostic tradition made use of the canonical gospels at points where we find parallels, and that there is no reason to suppose that any passage in Thomas (in spite of interesting textual variants) provides an earlier or a more reliable version of any saying of Jesus.

A cousin or even a more distant kinsman might be called a brother in Hebrew or Aramaic; but there is no reason to suppose that these brothers were not younger sons of Joseph and Mary.

Suppose they find it, will not the reason be itself in need of a further reason?

I suppose that all of us contain mixed measures of sanity and insanity, of madness and reason.

Of course I'd not suppose that we know the past without inferring, The specious present — the datum self — contains a time - span 0f present, past, future, which, by acquaintance, gives us clues to pastness, otherness, and inferential reason.

The term is not, however, to be found in the book itself; where we hear of «secret words» or of the «mysteries» of Jesus (62) or of «the word of the Father» (79) Thus while the compilation of Thomas is in form not unlike the collection or collections of sayings of Jesus which may underlie the materials common to Matthew and Luke, there is no reason to suppose that the two are related, or that either was originally known as a gospel.

«One must not suppose these slaves do not exercise their reason» observed Andrews, despite the extreme frustration he felt in his struggle to teach the Pulayas.43 Notwithstanding the limitations in the explicit communication of the Christian message, certain ideas appear to have made a stronger appeal to the Pulayas than to anyone else.

There is no reason to suppose, however, that all biblical Israelites in all places and in all times held to the exact meaning of the verb «kipper.»

There is no more reason to suppose that he is being weak - minded on this point than when he denies dimensionality as a necessary characteristic of the extensive continuum.

I suppose this might be part of the reason so many new names are popping up to help us describe «church.»

My perplexity leads me to try to understand the difference between us that leads Sherburne to find the irrevocable extensiveness of an actual entity sufficient reason to suppose that regional inclusion is impossible.

The reason for including classes and relations as part of the content of mathematics in «Mathematics» is that the theory of classes and relations, like all mathematics under the thesis of Principia Mathematica, is supposed to be deducible from the «ultimate logical premises» (MAT 292).

People of a skeptical disposition commonly suppose that because modern science has provided them with a reason to disbelieve the claims of religion, or because they think it has, modern science must therefore be the generating force behind secularization itself ¯ that historical progression, evident in the West since the Renaissance, in which habits and institutions are less and less influenced by religious doctrine.

I can not see any reason to suppose that this need for objective criticism of immediate insights is less today than it was in St. Paul's time, or in Luther's and Calvin's.

When this occurs against the back drop of Christianity, a person may think that the reason they are hearing something or seeing visions is a sign of some sort because they are supposed to do something, or are chosen somehow.

Comments such as muslims are a disease and we must erraticate them makes little sense when we as Americans are suppose to be on the side of reason and tolerence.

Yet there is good reason to suppose that the logic of the Incarnation can be most adequately grasped if God is perceived as one who appropriates the totality of the world process into his own being.

The course of life on this planet has involved many drastic changes, and there is no reason to suppose that it has now arrived at permanent stability.

Let us turn now to the question of what is wrong with the reasoning that misled so many into supposing that industrialization and globalization would increase happiness.

Recent scholarly interpreters of Romans have persuaded me that, whereas Paul may not have been interested in the pure subjectivity of Jesus, highlighted by the English word «faith,» there is no reason to suppose that he was not interested in Jesus» faithfulness.

So there's no reason to suppose that what we don't currently understand is the work of a god.

Most importantly, while I do agree that common descent is supported by the bulk of the evidence (although admittedly there are difficulties at higher phylogenetic levels), I certainly do not think we have any reason to suppose the process occurred by random mutation and natural selection, the position Prof. Arnhart attributes to me.

There is as good reason to suppose that these were in the oral and written sources as any of the others.

Nature has been «groaning» since the first appearance of biological species unless we suppose it was allowed for some reason in anticipation of the fall.

There is every reason to suppose that the higher animals have similar immediate enjoyment of themselves as centers of experience.

Otherwise, what reason do we have for supposing that God, as «author of the whole drama,» meant the statement to be understood, in the light of subsequent developments, as a reference to humanity's future redemption?»

We may suppose that this is the primary reason for the centrality of the resurrection in the Christian faith.

MODERN WOMAN: I suppose the reason it seems so unreal is that it wasn't just that one moment before — of touching bottom — that I seemed to return to this morning.

Suppose someone were thinking through the chain of reasoning in the following syllogism: -LSB-(P Q) & P] Q.

Even this is probably an overestimate, since there is no reason to suppose that all of those in the don't know / won't say column are same - sex attracted.

Finally, for Whitehead there is no reason to suppose that below this higher unity of the lived world there should be a highly intense experiential activity.