Sentences with phrase «of tactical approach»

Whereas «Battlefield» often requires more of a tactical approach, especially in Domination and Rush game modes, «Ghosts» depends on your fast - twitch reflexes, similar to «Counter-Strike.»

This is more of a tactical approach to diversification, that is, trying to benefit in the short term through specific information with an expectation of quick gains.

I have to agree with Paul Mearson's assessment of our tactical approach after going 3 0 up.....

ideas like that came about because of an alteration of tactical approach.

Speaking at a press conference this evening, the Gunners chief outlined the kind of tactical approach and values the next Arsenal manager must have in order to continue Wenger's legacy.

Any one or combination of these tactical approaches can make up the components of an overall marketing strategy.

This opens up a variety of tactical approaches for solving puzzles, defeating your foes, and turning the environment to your advantage.

Not exact matches

«As a first - time, young female founder who quickly grew from three people on a couch to a team of ten, we love how this book clearly outlines so many tactical approaches to communication, being a good leader, and building trust on the team.»

But there are plenty of opportunities to invest in stocks right now if you're willing to take a more tactical approach.

His tactical approach utilizes all of the most recent data on growing sales in today's marketplace.

But while the information - as - product concept may help you address some of the tactical decisions involved in branded content creation, getting your company to really take a strategic, integrated, and editorial approach to content marketing may require a more significant mindset shift.

With this approach, you leave the rest of your money on track in your long - term strategic asset allocation plan without having to worry about tax consequences or rebalancing effects from changing back and forth between your «core» investments and your tactical ideas.

He's apparently never to blame for the onedimensional (tactical) game approach regardless of the opponent and he's also never to blame for overplaying his players causing mid-term injuries like Ozil, Koscielny, Giroud most recently and Ramsey last year (I'm excluding Wilshere because his injuries are foremost due to his reckless playing style and behavior vs other players).

If Wenger can't be motivated enough to take some revenge on Mourinho, not even for the sake of the fans, after 12 losses... If his can ship 17 goals in 3 games against top level opposition and still continue with a similar approach to games, then I don't know what will ever really drive this guy to overhaul his tactical approach to compete more fiercely against big teams...

obviously I would prefer to have a much more suitable alternative in the defensive midfielder positions but if they focused more on defensive end and the occasional long - ball, this would allow Bellerin and Sead ample opportunities to bomb forward on their respective wings while still having enough cover to maintain their defensive shape... it would likewise allow for overlapping runs on both wings, thereby letting both Sanchez and Perez to cut inside and get shots away in and around the top of the box with their most dominant feet... if goals were needed I would sub Bellerin for OX and bring Ramsey in for Elneny then switch to a 3 -2-4-1 (more of a 3 -1-5-1 with Ramsey playing higher up the pitch) and I would only use Giroud as a sub when the game dictated it for tactical reasons... this would allow us to be a high energy team with incredible link - up play and a much more direct approach in the offensive end

I think the CRAZIEST of all is Mr. Arsene who benched him against liverpool when he was so fit and tagged it» wrong tactical approach».

While the former has undoubtedly adopted a more pragmatic approach with an emphasis on organisation, defensive solidity along with tactical flexibility, Sarri and Napoli have earned the tag of being Italy's entertainers with their slick football and attacking flair, scoring 66 goals in 31 league games.

As well as the tactical nuances that could help Wenger get Arsenal into the fifth round of the FA cup, the simple fact that our opponents beat Liverpool home and away should sharpen up the Gunners and make sure that we approach this game in the right way.

Also with another striker there is the added benefit of a different tactical approach, because sometimes with our attacks are very entertaining but don't produce anything (like a monkey on a tricycle).

Loosening the purse strings may solve one of our greatest issues, but another is whether Wenger is wise enough to realise that certain games require a different tactical approach.

No tactical approach allows a player to allow threats to defence in the hope of blaming the manager's tactics.

They are pushed so high up with pitch because that is what they do every game, it's part of Wenger's tactical approach.

He need to strengthen the squad (CB, CDM, CF & wingers), value fans feedback, improve his tactical approach depending on the quality of the opponent.

I think the lack of width is the biggest remaining weakness in Wenger's tactical approach.

It was so tactical and psychological, a battle of two completely different approaches.

How do you explain it when a coach will not change his tactical approach to a game in the course of 90 minutes even when it is obvious to all

No matter how you slice it, you can't run an uptempo offence with Giroud on the pitch and that means sideways soccer and an over-reliance on crosses into the box, thereby negating many of the very reasons Lacazette was on your radar in the first place... we simply aren't clinical enough from wide positions to continue with that approach, which is why many fans have been clamoring for a viable alternative to Giroud for several years... once again this isn't an attack on Giroud, he clearly has some tangible skills, but his mere presence on the pitch greatly impacts your tactical options... Giroud's weaknesses are simply highlighted by the way in which our offence now moves in a more horizontal than vertical manner, which allows most teams ample time to regroup defensively before a scoring opportunity even arises... a player of Ibra's or Benzema's ilk would have been far more effective as they had size, speed and the first touch capabilities required to for intricate link - up play... once again square peg in a round hole

But what about them being miles ahead of us in terms of quality and tactical approach?

You know there are other formations that do nt neccesarily require a CDM, with the midfielders we have i think we have the luxury of contemplating different tactical approaches, Wishere has shown the an ability of playing a deeper role not neccesarily DM, more on the lines of a deep lying playmaker, so the reason we shouldn't experiment and see weather it could actually work is because seancali doesn't believe it would work...

Kinda makes sense though, the only reason people are asking for another CDM is because we all fear the possibility of injury to coquelin and know flamini is usless, beilick is inexperienced so it begs the question what happens if an injury where to occur, but wîth how many midfielders we have in the squad i think it could allow us to change a tactical approach and potentially experiment with people like Ramsey and Wishere potentially playing a deeper role??? But the striker is a must as i mentioned earlier Giroud went 8 games without scoring a goal and none of the other strikers stepped up to the plate, we cant have a drought of goals when your the quest for titles...

Although he takes an unorthodox approach to his performances, it can be say that Luiz is somewhat of an enigma, possessing all the necessary physical tools to succeed as a footballer, yet without the tactical awareness to adapt to every situation.

Lichtsteiner specializes in a very tactical level of play that would have at least made Son's life more difficult down the wing, forcing him to take less - ideal choices in his approach rather than having the free reign he did on Wednesday.

So this game against West Brom is important because it will allow us to experiment with different form of tactics (if Wenger does) i don't really care weather we win or not (ideally i'd prefer it if we did) but what i do care about is that we have a different tactical approach than what we've had in recent games (even if it means dropping people), because if we don't, all Villa have to do is park the bus and when possible lump it up to Benteke or when Arsenal commit too many men forward have Agbonglahor / Nzogbia / Sinclair / Grealish run against Metersacker (I'm not saying he is a bad defender, he is just not fast!!!!)

We can get the best out of this players only if arsene add a brilliant tactical approach.

One trend common, irrespective of tactical set - up though, is that players who specialise in one specific aspect of the game are being phased out, and a more holistic approach demanded.

Given that the opponent simply had to get out of the game without losing 5 - 0, they also clearly took a more conservative tactical approach to ensure their place in the next round.

Perhaps Liverpool need a new, more effective tactical approach for these matches, one which focusses on creating overloads out wide, but even then, Liverpool lack aggression from their midfield, the number of through balls is low, as was the number of dribbles, and if packing stats were available for Liverpool, I would imagine only Emre Can may have had a chance of standing out, for Liverpool's passing was far too passive and slow.

This has its place of course, but I also believe it is incredibly important to look at how the manager's tactical approach affects how the team plays.

That he was unable to change anything substantial in the tactical approach is a stark indictment of his leadership and suitability for a job at the very highest level.

Tuchel's tactical approach was designed to get his players to deliver some of the most exciting football possible, and on their best days, his team justified all of the comparisons with Pep Guardiola.

Now, as Mourinho's side take on Benfica in Portugal, Gerrard spoke of the tactic and conceded that for him, as someone who never won the Premier League, Mourinho's tactical management is vindicated if they, or any other side uses such approach, goes on to win the league.

Chapman's team won the league four times in five years, and his development of advanced diets, fitness and tactical approaches was revolutionary.

Pochettino has improved the tactical awareness of his team, but when it comes to taking on the best in Europe, Tottenham's high - pressing reactive approach can sometimes fall short.

His more obviously calculated and tactical approach may lead to dissent from supporters who expect Spain to set the agenda rather than create a game - plan that seeks to react to initiative of their opponents.

Chelsea never looked back and strolled to a four - goal victory built on the foundations of a different tactical approach than Mourinho brought to Stamford Bridge.

The Twitter Army is pouring abuse on the manager's head 24/7 over what they perceive to be his personal obstinacy whilst disapproving greatly of his on field tactical approach.

While the essence of the team's approach remains the same, Lopetegui made tactical tweaks throughout qualification.

I like Garcia's tactical approach and use of high pressing.

What is clear is that three things need to come together for Arsenal to have any hope of finally winning the competition this season — Their performances, their fitness and Wenger's tactical approach to the big games.

The Premier League season is less than two weeks old, but a look at how the top sides lined up in their opening matches provides an interesting indication of how they plan to approach the season from a tactical perspective.