He says he is rejecting all
talk of tactical voting and is instead «going for broke» to maximise his party's share of the vote.
Today the Telegraph comes out in support
of tactical voting in Scotland, arguing: «To avert a crisis that will once again threaten the Union, a new and bold approach is needed to stop Mr Salmond in his tracks.»
He saw his vote drop by 18 % as the Conservative chris Davies took the seat, with Labour also well up as the
tradition of tactical voting in Brecon and Radnorshire broke down.
In 2010,
patterns of tactical voting which had built up over twenty years helped both parties retain enough marginals to deny David Cameron a majority.
And he saw increased evidence
of tactical voting which meant «you are forced to vote for a candidate you do not much like in order to get rid of a candidate you really can not stand».
I would argue that votes are fairer under AV, as fewer are discarded and thus fewer are left without a voice, and also that the
sort of tactical voting popular under FPTP (voting for Labour / the Tories in order to keep the Tories / Labour out, when really you would much rather vote for a minor party) will be vastly diminished upon the adoption of AV.
There was
evidence of tactical voting in some seats - Labour held threatened London seats Islington South and Westminster North by increasing its share of the vote at the expense of the Liberal Democrats.
Scholarly research conclude that IRV is one of the less - manipulable voting methods, with theorist Nicolaus Tideman noting that, «alternative vote is quite resistant to strategy» [45] and Australian political analyst Antony Green dismissing
suggestions of tactical voting.
Faced with a surge of SNP support that threatens to have a decisive impact on the makeup of the next government, Scotland - always a part of the UK ripe for this sort of thing - has seen an
outbreak of tactical voting in recent weeks.
Looking at the numbers, reinforced by today's Survation poll, her optimism about the
powers of tactical voting don't look very realistic.
This is not possible in IRV, as participants vote only once, and this prohibits certain
forms of tactical voting that can be prevalent in «standard» runoff voting.
Cable did not say whether he would push for a progressive alliance at the next general election, but as a former Labour councillor many expect he would be keen on the
idea of tactical voting to help Lib Dem, Labour and Green candidates to oust Tory MPs.
Neal also cites the 2016 Richmond Park by - election as an example of Progressive voters supporting the
concepts of tactical voting and smart campaigning.
In summary, Brake retained quite a
lot of tactical votes from naturally Labour areas, and many of those he didn't retain went over to UKIP, with UKIP also sapping some Tory votes from the leafier areas.
It is purely the hard work of the Lib Dems locally which enables this
degree of tactical voting to persist at the present time.
And in Scotland, which has a greater
tradition of tactical voting, the likelihood is that proportion will be much higher — especially if groups like Scotland's Big Voice have an impact.
We could get a different
kind of tactical voting, where people try to send messages through the voting system by voting for single - issue candidates first, then the candidate they want second, on the assumption that the single - issue candidate will be knocked out before the candidate they want.
«It's hugely high risk if people vote for the Greens as some
sort of tactical vote,» Labour candidate Nancy Platts told Channel 4 News.
[10] However, this
suggestion of tactical voting was opposed by Bow Group patrons including Lords Heseltine, Howard and Lamont, in a joint statement.