That case stands for the unremarkable point that the Copyright Act does not preempt claims for
conversion of tangible property (such as a compact disc), even if that tangible property contains the plaintiff's intellectual property (such as the music on the compact disc).
Critics of the term argue that «piracy,» which originally meant armed
robbery of tangible property on the high seas (a form of theft), is an inapt way to describe copyright infringement which is really different in kind than theft because copyright infringement does not deprive anyone of use of the materials, it merely impairs the legally granted monopoly of someone regarding how it shall be used.
@Dan Graney for the appliances under $ 500, you will want to look at electing the De Minimis Safe Harbor which allows you to expense personal property items and
components of tangible property under $ 500.
The definition of property damage is «physical injury to, destruction of, or loss of use
of tangible property.»
Property damage is «physical injury to, destruction of, or loss of use
of tangible property.»
ok Mindy & Joe; i will have to go over the fine print cuz i did nt see nor was told it would automatically renew (i notice the premium CHANGED and WAS HIGHER ANYWAY) even though they sent a renewal offer which again was changed and increased even though i never in all my life have filed a claim with
any of my tangible property insurances (auto, home, landlord, etc).