There are at least two types
of teaching cases.
Not exact matches
They're doing it through dozens
of workshops held in community centers, libraries, YMCA's, and municipal buildings, where anywhere from 40 to 60 women (and sometimes a few men) work their way through a two - hour curriculum that
teaches them how to figure out how much they should be paid, how to make their
case to an employer, and how to gracefully exit a negotiation that might not be going well.
These days Hawken is consulting, writing,
teaching, and — as in the
case of the Seattle protests — marshaling the forces
of antiglobalism.
The Odette MBA uses a variety
of teaching techniques from
case studies to computer simulations.
«Doing 20
cases on countries and politics
taught me one important thing: there's a lot
of similarity between different politics situations.
The study, authored by University
of Wisconsin - Madison
teaching assistant James Bonus, found that playing Pokémon Go can be linked to positive outcomes such as friendship formation and walking — which in many
cases «predicted enhanced well - being,» the study said.
Given to Gates by Warren Buffett, the out -
of - print collection
of New Yorker articles from the 1960s hones in on different
case studies — price - fixing at General Electric, the flop
of the Ford Edsel and missteps at Xerox, to name a few — in order to
teach greater strategic lessons.
There are millions
of books, classes,
case studies, and, yes, even magazine articles that are supposed to
teach CEOs everything about how to improve their businesses.
First, all SEALs have a sick sense
of humor, and second, it was another way to
teach us how to think (just in
case running around with a boat on our heads wasn't enough) that would eventually mold us into becoming something special.
It's the Times itself,
of course, that has done so much to spark the current conversation around harassment with its exposés on Harvey Weinstein and Louis C.K.. There's probably no loftier perch in all
of political journalism from which one could
teach the trade and enlist young women into the calling — or, as the
case may be, betray them.
For eight years it resided with CasePlace.org and grew to have more than 700
teaching materials, including videos,
cases, syllabi,
teaching modules, and reading collections, with thousands
of downloads per year by researchers, teachers, and companies.
We also produced original content for the site including
teaching modules,
cases and reading collections, that were designed to help faculty think through the questions that arise at the intersection
of business and society, and incorporate these issues into their curriculum.
Those executives — including Cook — have used those
case studies to
teach courses that groom the company's next generation
of leaders.
The
case method is the antithesis
of how entrepreneurs build startups — it
teaches pattern recognition tools for the wrong patterns — and therefore has limited value as an entrepreneurship
teaching tool.
He's an extreme
case, and while it's true that he was able to get out
of a MOUNTAIN
of student loan debt, it's not like he can
teach others.
If you were creating a middle -
of - the - funnel webinar discussing the
teaching methodology your horseback riding school follows, and you were targeting an intermediate - level rider, you could include a
case study
of an intermediate rider who came to your school and, as a result
of your methodology and training, became one
of the top riders in their division and moved on to compete with more advanced - level horseback riders.
But in Germaine's
case — the women she
teaches are talking about freely choosing against their natures, against being moms, against the natural point
of the family, against the future
of our country and our species.
The National Center for Science Education, which supports the
teaching of evolution in public education, is closely monitoring the
case.
Because
of a court
case in Louisiana that expressly forbid Biblical Creationism being
taught in school science classes, the wording changed and the authors removed references to catastrophism, a world - wide flood, a recent inception
of the earth or life, the concept
of kinds, or any concepts from Genesis.
I just don't like it when people cherry pick their religious sources or, in the
case of this article, outright go against what their religious texts
teach to try and appear more politically correct.
You can't
teach understanding and compassion and love for thy neighbor and then not allow LGBT individuals into your fold, or in the
case of the Catholic church, not allow divorcees (or those that marry a divorcee) to participate in all your sacraments.
While it was once true that most testing
of potential new drugs took place in medical schools and
teaching hospitals, that is no longer the
case, and in Elliott's view the change has given rise to serious problems and abuses.
Or are you going to tell me that some parts
of the Bible shouldn't be taken literally, in which
case you are no longer holding to the
teachings of the scripture and I guess you need to be stoned to death.
I'm reading NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare decision) in preparation for
teaching the
case to my constitutional law students and came across the following most interesting passage in in Justice Ginsburg's opinion: «A mandate to purchase a particular product would be unconstitutional if, for example, the edict impermissibly abridged the freedom
of speech, interfered with the free exercise
of religion, or infringed on a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause.»
When I
teach Aristophanes THE CLOUDS, I
of course dwell on the part when the poet shows us that a guy who loves his family not about to listen to «the
case for incest.»
Among the many notable decisions
of the U.S. Supreme Court in the area
of religion was the 1963
case Abington Township School District v. Schempp, which held that tax - supported schools were only allowed to
teach about religion.
The definition
of «biblical» ought to be the best explanation
of what the text is explicitly
teaching «ought» to be the
case.
Full
of himself, he stepped up when his
case was called, and began, as we were
taught to do in law school: «May it please the court, my name is Edward R. Lev and I represent the Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company
of Chicago.»
It's similar to the «12 days
of Christmas» to some people in that it's something you do each day leading up to an event, its just that in this
case it's something you do that brings you closer to Christ and his
teachings.
But they never offer guidance for a
case in which the couple must do the hard work
of obeying what the Church has
taught for two thousand years.
I agree when you are show
casing narrow minded traditions in church, and I am all for that, but now you are removing one
of the most clearly attested
teachings of the NT.
When someone is accused
of «cherry - picking» verses from the Bible, it means that they have a particular doctrine or idea they want to
teach to others, and rather than considering «the whole counsel
of God,» they pick a choose a few select verses from various books
of the Bible which seems to prove their point or present their
case in the strongest possible way.
So I speak as someone who has struggled with, and in some
cases regretted, her decisions at the ballot box, and who recognizes no single political party boasts a consistent pro-life ethic, just as no single political party embodies the
teachings of Jesus or the values
of his Kingdom.
What is needed, however, so as to reassure the Eastern Orthodox is some mechanism whereby a pope who departs from Tradition by
teaching error, or what may be construed as error, can be inhibited by a form
of ecclesiastical enquiry or trial — as is the
case with any other bishop in the Church.
I do a fair amount
of teaching with
case studies.
This statement comes from one
of my ninth graders in response to yet another lecture
of mine on how important it is for students to bring their literature books to class — a particular hurdle in my
case because I
teach at a military school....
He
teaches that divorce is to be allowed only in the
case of infidelity on the part
of one or both
of the spouses.
Nothing in that
teaching precludes, and much in that
teaching seems to invite, the hope that everyone» past, present, and future» will be saved, even as we are painfully aware that that may not be the
case, and even as we guard against the sin
of presumption, which is to take for granted that it will be the
case with us.
And the book also offers a deliberately wide array
of approaches to trinitarian issues, including not only historical and systematic theologians, but biblical scholars and analytic philosophers
of religion, writing from a variety
of theological and communal points
of view» Roman Catholic, Protestant, and, in one
case, Jewish (the New Testament scholar Alan Segal, who contributes an instructive if somewhat technical chapter on the role
of conflicts between Jews and Christians in the emergence
of early trinitarian
teaching).
It is difficult to find a clearly articulated
case in Catholic social
teaching for modern - style welfare states involving huge government intervention in the lives
of families combined with enormous transfers totalling around a quarter
of national income.
Therefore, although Jesus would be the last person to use fear as a moral weapon (except in the
case of the desperately self - complacent), he did
teach that life should be lived with a due sense
of awe and responsibility.
In the
case of sex, the sexual organs have an inbuilt procreative purpose, and as Humanae Vitae n. 12
teaches, the sexual act has the two inherent meanings
of procreation and union.
In such a
case he must present his view in a way that does justice to the ecclesial importance
of his opinion, to the continuation
of his dialogue with the magisterium und also to his respect for the latter's
teaching.
The opposite is the
case in the
teaching of Jesus where the Kingdom is regularly spoken
of as «coming», e.g. Matt.
In all
cases, these crimes have sprung from aspects
of the
teachings of these traditions that are rejected by its finest representatives.
There need not be truly subjective guilt either in the
case of the individual or
of a social group, even when the subjective conscience is confronted with the official
teaching of the Church as a formally binding authority.
In the
case of religious teachers, the easy way out is often to
teach things
of which we have no idea, to give answers which do not satisfy ourselves, speak
of things we have not heard, show things we have not seen.
Leaving aside this quite possible
case, we may say that the dialogue between a theologian and the magisterium is an intra-ecclesial one, and the doctrine
of this theologian an ecclesial doctrine only if he respects and accepts as binding that
teaching which the Church considers inseparable from her faith and proclaims with absolute engagement.
For that reason the Church
teaches moral maxims with specific content to be observed by the faithful in every
case where the inner structure
of reality to which these principles apply is actually present and where this presence is recognized by the Christian.
Finally, it must be observed that it is not easy and simple in every
case to indicate whether some particular
teaching of the ordinary magisterium is already a dogma or merely authentic but in itself reformable
teaching.