Sentences with phrase «of teaching cases»

There are at least two types of teaching cases.

Not exact matches

They're doing it through dozens of workshops held in community centers, libraries, YMCA's, and municipal buildings, where anywhere from 40 to 60 women (and sometimes a few men) work their way through a two - hour curriculum that teaches them how to figure out how much they should be paid, how to make their case to an employer, and how to gracefully exit a negotiation that might not be going well.
These days Hawken is consulting, writing, teaching, and — as in the case of the Seattle protests — marshaling the forces of antiglobalism.
The Odette MBA uses a variety of teaching techniques from case studies to computer simulations.
«Doing 20 cases on countries and politics taught me one important thing: there's a lot of similarity between different politics situations.
The study, authored by University of Wisconsin - Madison teaching assistant James Bonus, found that playing Pokémon Go can be linked to positive outcomes such as friendship formation and walking — which in many cases «predicted enhanced well - being,» the study said.
Given to Gates by Warren Buffett, the out - of - print collection of New Yorker articles from the 1960s hones in on different case studies — price - fixing at General Electric, the flop of the Ford Edsel and missteps at Xerox, to name a few — in order to teach greater strategic lessons.
There are millions of books, classes, case studies, and, yes, even magazine articles that are supposed to teach CEOs everything about how to improve their businesses.
First, all SEALs have a sick sense of humor, and second, it was another way to teach us how to think (just in case running around with a boat on our heads wasn't enough) that would eventually mold us into becoming something special.
It's the Times itself, of course, that has done so much to spark the current conversation around harassment with its exposés on Harvey Weinstein and Louis C.K.. There's probably no loftier perch in all of political journalism from which one could teach the trade and enlist young women into the calling — or, as the case may be, betray them.
For eight years it resided with CasePlace.org and grew to have more than 700 teaching materials, including videos, cases, syllabi, teaching modules, and reading collections, with thousands of downloads per year by researchers, teachers, and companies.
We also produced original content for the site including teaching modules, cases and reading collections, that were designed to help faculty think through the questions that arise at the intersection of business and society, and incorporate these issues into their curriculum.
Those executives — including Cook — have used those case studies to teach courses that groom the company's next generation of leaders.
The case method is the antithesis of how entrepreneurs build startups — it teaches pattern recognition tools for the wrong patterns — and therefore has limited value as an entrepreneurship teaching tool.
He's an extreme case, and while it's true that he was able to get out of a MOUNTAIN of student loan debt, it's not like he can teach others.
If you were creating a middle - of - the - funnel webinar discussing the teaching methodology your horseback riding school follows, and you were targeting an intermediate - level rider, you could include a case study of an intermediate rider who came to your school and, as a result of your methodology and training, became one of the top riders in their division and moved on to compete with more advanced - level horseback riders.
But in Germaine's case — the women she teaches are talking about freely choosing against their natures, against being moms, against the natural point of the family, against the future of our country and our species.
The National Center for Science Education, which supports the teaching of evolution in public education, is closely monitoring the case.
Because of a court case in Louisiana that expressly forbid Biblical Creationism being taught in school science classes, the wording changed and the authors removed references to catastrophism, a world - wide flood, a recent inception of the earth or life, the concept of kinds, or any concepts from Genesis.
I just don't like it when people cherry pick their religious sources or, in the case of this article, outright go against what their religious texts teach to try and appear more politically correct.
You can't teach understanding and compassion and love for thy neighbor and then not allow LGBT individuals into your fold, or in the case of the Catholic church, not allow divorcees (or those that marry a divorcee) to participate in all your sacraments.
While it was once true that most testing of potential new drugs took place in medical schools and teaching hospitals, that is no longer the case, and in Elliott's view the change has given rise to serious problems and abuses.
Or are you going to tell me that some parts of the Bible shouldn't be taken literally, in which case you are no longer holding to the teachings of the scripture and I guess you need to be stoned to death.
I'm reading NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare decision) in preparation for teaching the case to my constitutional law students and came across the following most interesting passage in in Justice Ginsburg's opinion: «A mandate to purchase a particular product would be unconstitutional if, for example, the edict impermissibly abridged the freedom of speech, interfered with the free exercise of religion, or infringed on a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause.»
When I teach Aristophanes THE CLOUDS, I of course dwell on the part when the poet shows us that a guy who loves his family not about to listen to «the case for incest.»
Among the many notable decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court in the area of religion was the 1963 case Abington Township School District v. Schempp, which held that tax - supported schools were only allowed to teach about religion.
The definition of «biblical» ought to be the best explanation of what the text is explicitly teaching «ought» to be the case.
Full of himself, he stepped up when his case was called, and began, as we were taught to do in law school: «May it please the court, my name is Edward R. Lev and I represent the Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago.»
It's similar to the «12 days of Christmas» to some people in that it's something you do each day leading up to an event, its just that in this case it's something you do that brings you closer to Christ and his teachings.
But they never offer guidance for a case in which the couple must do the hard work of obeying what the Church has taught for two thousand years.
I agree when you are show casing narrow minded traditions in church, and I am all for that, but now you are removing one of the most clearly attested teachings of the NT.
When someone is accused of «cherry - picking» verses from the Bible, it means that they have a particular doctrine or idea they want to teach to others, and rather than considering «the whole counsel of God,» they pick a choose a few select verses from various books of the Bible which seems to prove their point or present their case in the strongest possible way.
So I speak as someone who has struggled with, and in some cases regretted, her decisions at the ballot box, and who recognizes no single political party boasts a consistent pro-life ethic, just as no single political party embodies the teachings of Jesus or the values of his Kingdom.
What is needed, however, so as to reassure the Eastern Orthodox is some mechanism whereby a pope who departs from Tradition by teaching error, or what may be construed as error, can be inhibited by a form of ecclesiastical enquiry or trial — as is the case with any other bishop in the Church.
I do a fair amount of teaching with case studies.
This statement comes from one of my ninth graders in response to yet another lecture of mine on how important it is for students to bring their literature books to class — a particular hurdle in my case because I teach at a military school....
He teaches that divorce is to be allowed only in the case of infidelity on the part of one or both of the spouses.
Nothing in that teaching precludes, and much in that teaching seems to invite, the hope that everyone» past, present, and future» will be saved, even as we are painfully aware that that may not be the case, and even as we guard against the sin of presumption, which is to take for granted that it will be the case with us.
And the book also offers a deliberately wide array of approaches to trinitarian issues, including not only historical and systematic theologians, but biblical scholars and analytic philosophers of religion, writing from a variety of theological and communal points of view» Roman Catholic, Protestant, and, in one case, Jewish (the New Testament scholar Alan Segal, who contributes an instructive if somewhat technical chapter on the role of conflicts between Jews and Christians in the emergence of early trinitarian teaching).
It is difficult to find a clearly articulated case in Catholic social teaching for modern - style welfare states involving huge government intervention in the lives of families combined with enormous transfers totalling around a quarter of national income.
Therefore, although Jesus would be the last person to use fear as a moral weapon (except in the case of the desperately self - complacent), he did teach that life should be lived with a due sense of awe and responsibility.
In the case of sex, the sexual organs have an inbuilt procreative purpose, and as Humanae Vitae n. 12 teaches, the sexual act has the two inherent meanings of procreation and union.
In such a case he must present his view in a way that does justice to the ecclesial importance of his opinion, to the continuation of his dialogue with the magisterium und also to his respect for the latter's teaching.
The opposite is the case in the teaching of Jesus where the Kingdom is regularly spoken of as «coming», e.g. Matt.
In all cases, these crimes have sprung from aspects of the teachings of these traditions that are rejected by its finest representatives.
There need not be truly subjective guilt either in the case of the individual or of a social group, even when the subjective conscience is confronted with the official teaching of the Church as a formally binding authority.
In the case of religious teachers, the easy way out is often to teach things of which we have no idea, to give answers which do not satisfy ourselves, speak of things we have not heard, show things we have not seen.
Leaving aside this quite possible case, we may say that the dialogue between a theologian and the magisterium is an intra-ecclesial one, and the doctrine of this theologian an ecclesial doctrine only if he respects and accepts as binding that teaching which the Church considers inseparable from her faith and proclaims with absolute engagement.
For that reason the Church teaches moral maxims with specific content to be observed by the faithful in every case where the inner structure of reality to which these principles apply is actually present and where this presence is recognized by the Christian.
Finally, it must be observed that it is not easy and simple in every case to indicate whether some particular teaching of the ordinary magisterium is already a dogma or merely authentic but in itself reformable teaching.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z