Sentences with phrase «of teaching pets»

Clicker training is a really great way of teaching your pet new things in a positive way and making learning fun...

Not exact matches

«Peter is one of the two people... who has taught me the most about how to invest in startups,» Altman wrote, when Thiel came on board in 2015.

Now she's teaching dozens of participants not only the basics of dog grooming and the fundamentals of being an good employee, but also helping them sort out the other logistical and life challenges that stand in the way of a career in the pet beautification business..

Peter Diamandis is chairman and CEO of the XPrize innovation competition, executive chairman of Silicon Valley - based teaching organization Singularity University and the founder of more than a dozen high - tech organizations.

Self - taught, his management style is based on the strict application of the principles of value management (Graham, Buffet, Peter Lynch, etc.), underpinned by a deep understanding of the Austrian theory of economic cycles.

Anonymous Coward III, The gospels of Peter and Thomas were not chosen to be part of the canon because of their inconsistency with the teachings of the rest of the Bible.

Peter — this is the beauty of Jesus» teaching.

A number of people that have written to respond to this article have spoken of the interpretation of the Bible, which is the number one problem in this present world as the Bible itself teaches us that no prophecy of scripture is of any private interpretation (2 Peter 1:20).

Catholics believe that this teaching authority is invested in the Magisterium, namely, the Bishop of Rome, who is the successor of Peter, and the bishops in communion with him.

In communion with the body of faithful Christians through the ages, we also affirm together that the entire teaching, worship, ministry, life, and mission of Christ's Church is to be held accountable to the final authority of Holy Scripture, which, for Evangelicals and Catholics alike, constitutes the word of God in written form (2 Timothy 3:15 - 17; 2 Peter 1:21).

In the Biblical Manuscript P72, dating from 175 - 200AD, and containing the entire text of 1 Peter, 2 Peter, and Jude, in this, we find 2 Peter 1:1 — ``... our God and Savior, Jesus Christ...» proving that the deity of Jesus was NOT a construct of Emperor Constantine (Roman Emperor from 306 - 337) as was proclaimed by Dan Brown in his book «The DaVinci Code,» but rather, this was a central teaching of the disciples from day 1.

To cite but a few examples, there is no mention of distinctively Catholic moral teaching, or of bishops and communion with Peter, or of the teaching authority of the Magisterium.

Peter did not preach that God would provide hundreds or thousands of different Christian denominations, and that they would teach different ways of being saved.

Jesus Christ didn't write the Bible his disciples did and therefore I conclude that most people in the world are illiterate and will be saved by the preaching and teaching of the only one real church of catholicism founded in Rome, Italy by Peter the first bishop of Rome.

The pope exercises this ministry chiefly by teaching as «Successor of Peter».

ICEMAN, When Jesus Christ commissioned Peter and the Apostles to go out to all nations teaching them all that He taught them and Baptise everyone... how were they to do that if the succession of Popes was not also commissioned?

Peter was one of the first twelve men sent out by Jesus to extend his own ministry of teaching and sanctifying.

Peter S. Hawkins taught religion and literature at Yale Divinity School, and is now professor of religion at Boston University.

Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»

We therefore accept unequivocally all the defined teachings and Councils of the Church from Jerusalem to Vatican II and we profess our loyalty to the Magisterium in communion with the See of Peter.

Back in November 1977 the co-founder of Faith Movement wrote, as editor of this magazine, «There will be no traditional priesthood left in Europe in ten years time, among the younger clergy, unless a start is urgently made to teach priests the full faith, the full spiritual heritage of the Church, and the full content of the life of Christ in the traditional image of the priest of the Western Patriarchate, the priesthood of the Latin rite, which is the priesthood of the fullness of Peter and Paul.»

They went to Capernaum, where Jesus taught in the synagogue and drove out an evil spirit, and afterwards went to the home of Simon and Andrew and healed Peter's mother - in - law who was ill in bed (Mark 1:14 - 31).

While Peter does teach that baptism saves us, a careful study of the context reveals that Peter is not talking about gaining eternal life and going to heaven when we die.

Peter's sermon in Acts 2:14 - 39 is not an example of early church «teaching» method.

I wonder what Yeshua (Jesus) himself taught on this and Peter was one of His close friends, wasn't he; interesting to speculate about.

Sending them out into the world with a covering of grace is what happens to us as His Royal Priesthood in His son, so this is consistent with NT teaching, as Peter points out in 1 Peter 2:9.

Just as Peter was not the dazzling originator of new teaching, his successors have more often served as a brake on innovation than as its impetus.

With your help, I addressed Genesis 1 - 3, the Peter and Paul and the Greco - Roman household codes, misconeptions regarding egalitarianism, the problems of patriarchy, and those difficult passages about Ephesian women teaching and leading men.

(3) Finally your suggestion that II Peter 2:13,18 & 19 teach that such false teachers may be allowed to eat meals with the believers and even teach in the church is a horrible twisting of scripture!

In Mark's gospel, immediately after Peter had confessed that Jesus was the Christ, Jesus «began to teach them [the disciples] that the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, chief priests and teachers of the law and that he must be killed and after three days rise again» (Mark 8:31).

Adopting a position not unlike that of Saint Peter before a vision taught him not to despise the Gentiles, the prophet held that would - be Christians would first have to choose to be chosen.

Since ascending the throne of Saint Peter, Pope Francis has shown more than any pope in my life time (I am 68 years old and a Roman Catholic) that he follows the teachings of Jesus Christ and he is the biggest breath of fresh air the Catholic Church has seen in centuries.

Still, twelve years later I found myself standing before the altar of St. Peter's Cathedral in Scranton, Pa., saying: «I believe everything that the Catholic Church believes, teaches, and proclaims to be revealed by God.»

Catholics teach that since apostles have the ability to speak and write the Word of God, and since the Pope is the successor of the apostle Peter, then anything the Pope says or writes is without error and is equal to the Bible.

The meaning of this last word is much disputed, and amongst those suggested are that Mark was literally an interpreter who translated Peter's Aramaic into Greek, that Mark was Peter's «dragoman» (cf. Acts 13:5), and that Mark «interpreted» Peter's teaching by handing it on and explaining it (Papias speaks of himself as handing on what he had learnt from the elders «with my interpretations»).

It is no secret that our Savior, Paul, Peter, and scores of others in scripture taught about sin, and righteousness.

His own pet proof of «why there almost certainly is no God» (a proof in which he takes much evident pride) is one that a usually mild - spoken friend of mine (a friend who has devoted too much of his life to teaching undergraduates the basic rules of logic and the elementary language of philosophy) has described as «possibly the single most incompetent logical argument ever made for or against anything in the whole history of the human race.»

but the gospel itself was recognised as containing much - of Peter's teaching and was wrongly attributed to Mark, who was known to have been Peter's «interpreter».

The story of Peter's confession at Caesarea Philippi, and of his denial of Jesus must have formed part of his own teaching.

It is true that both the gospels and the speeches of Peter and Paul in Acts give important testimony as to what the apostles taught about the Christian life and proclaimed about the meaning of Jesus» own life, death, and resurrection; yet both the gospels and Acts were written, not by apostles, but by later disciples, and their evidence on particular points stands in need of confirmation, if possible, from the apostles themselves.

And certainly Peter did not go about giving a historical lecture on the life and teaching of Jesus.

For he [Mark] had neither heard the Lord nor been his personal follower, but at a later stage, as I said, he had followed Peter, who used to adapt the teachings to the needs of the moment, but not as though he were drawing up a connected account of the oracles of the Lord: so that Mark committed no error in writing certain matters just as he remembered them.

The same lesson, with a different background, is taught in the last chapter of John, where Jesus is working with his chosen right - hand man, Simon Peter.

-- but later on followed Peter and became his interpreter; and Peter «used to adapt the teachings to the needs of the moment, but not as though he were drawing up a connected account of the oracles of the Lord,» so that Mark was perfectly justified in setting them down «just as he remembered them.»

Frederick Douglass: Race and the Rebirth of American Liberalism by Peter C. Myers University Press of Kansas, 265 pages, $ 34.95 As predictably as the calendar pages turn, each time I taught American political thought, whenever we got to the Declaration of Independence, some student would report....

We have no record of Peter's wife preaching, teaching, organizing a potluck, or running the first nursery in Jerusalem.

Those who heard Peter's preaching were baptised, and — again in the words of Scripture — «they continued steadfastly in the teaching of the apostles and in the communion of the breaking of bread and in prayers... praising God and being in favour with all the people» (Acts 2:41 - 47).

Thomas doubted for eight days - he publicly denied a truth of the faith taught by the Magisterium [of Peter!].

He recognised that it was authentically Catholic and therefore, as the Successor of Peter, he gave his name and the weight of his authority to this document because it teaches the Catholic faith.

Like his Vicar on earth at Tor Vergata to more than two million people, in this gospel Jesus teaches the crowd from the barque of Peter.